Twitter is known to be one of the familiar social networking platform these days, among many others, with a lot of user engagement. This microblogging site encourages social interactions, allowing users to stay up to date on the latest news and events and share them with others in real time. Tweets are limited to 280 characters and is allowed to include links to related websites and tools. With a platform having such wide reach, it is prone to be targeted negatively and spams are one way to do it. Spammers use this platform to display malicious content that is inappropriate and harmful to users worldwide. Machine Learning uses various approaches that can be used to detect spam and overcome it. However, with the advent of recent technologies it has been observed that the properties of tweets vary overtime making it difficult to detect spam leading to the “Twitter Spam Drift” problem. This paper reviews the papers published since 2018 that have focused on the spam drift problem and gives a comparative analysis of the different algorithms that are utilized on the various data sets to tackle such a problem.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
13 February 2024
1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMMA-2021
24–26 December 2021
Chennai, India
Research Article|
February 13 2024
Comparative analysis of algorithms used for Twitter spam drift detection
Libina Thomas;
Libina Thomas
1
School of C&IT, REVA University
, Bengaluru, India
Search for other works by this author on:
Mona Nirvinda;
Mona Nirvinda
1
School of C&IT, REVA University
, Bengaluru, India
Search for other works by this author on:
Mounika;
Mounika
1
School of C&IT, REVA University
, Bengaluru, India
Search for other works by this author on:
Lalitha;
Lalitha
1
School of C&IT, REVA University
, Bengaluru, India
Search for other works by this author on:
Vishwanath Hulipalled
Vishwanath Hulipalled
a)
1
School of C&IT, REVA University
, Bengaluru, India
a)Corresponding author: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
a)Corresponding author: [email protected]
AIP Conf. Proc. 2742, 020063 (2024)
Citation
Libina Thomas, Mona Nirvinda, Mounika, Lalitha, Vishwanath Hulipalled; Comparative analysis of algorithms used for Twitter spam drift detection. AIP Conf. Proc. 13 February 2024; 2742 (1): 020063. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0191653
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
23
Views
Citing articles via
Design of a 100 MW solar power plant on wetland in Bangladesh
Apu Kowsar, Sumon Chandra Debnath, et al.
Inkjet- and flextrail-printing of silicon polymer-based inks for local passivating contacts
Zohreh Kiaee, Andreas Lösel, et al.
Production and characterization of corncob biochar for agricultural use
Praphatsorn Rattanaphaiboon, Nigran Homdoung, et al.
Related Content
A framework for Twitter spam detection and reporting
AIP Conf. Proc. (February 2024)
Comparative study of different machine learning models for detecting spam tweet
AIP Conf. Proc. (December 2023)
Anonymous account detection in social media using machine learning and natural language processing
AIP Conf. Proc. (May 2023)
Detecting spammer and fake user on social networks using machine learning approach
AIP Conference Proceedings (January 2022)
Linguistics oriented spammed review detection and analysis of spammer behavioral methods
AIP Conf. Proc. (June 2023)