This study aims to design a multimedia-based online game on the topic of multiplication of integers using the Scratch application. This research uses the Multimedia Development Life Cycle (MDLC) development model. Based on the research results, it is known that the learning media in the form of games on the topic of multiplication of integers can be well designed using Scratch through the MDLC development model. The results of the student questionnaire analysis showed that all students had a positive opinion of the game that had been designed. This happens because the games that have been designed are attractive and are considered to be able to facilitate students to learn. The author suggests that further research be conducted to determine the effectiveness of using games that have been designed.

Topics
Students, Learning and learning models
1.
Amaliah
 and
E.
Sudihartinih
,
J. Pendidik
4
(
2
),
6
–
10
(
2019
).
Google Scholar
 
2.
N.
Yusuf
 and
I.
Arcana
,
Unt. J. Pendidik
6
(
2
),
22
–
23
(
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
3.
S.
Kemp
, “
Digital 2020: Global Digital Overview
,”, (
2020
) retrieved April 24, 2021 from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-global-digital-overview?format=
Google Scholar
 
4.
E.
Budiman
,
R.
Hasudungan
, and
A.
Khoiri
proceeding seminar ilmu computer dan teknologi informasi
2
(
1
) (
2017
), pp
381
–
6
.
Google Scholar
 
5.
S. M.
Patahuddin
 and
A. F.
Rokhim
,
J. Pendidik. Mat
3
(
2
),
103
–
111
(
2009
).
Google Scholar
 
6.
E.
Sudihartinih
 and
D.
Rachmatin
,
J. Pendidik
5
(
1
),
77
–
81
(
2020
).
Google Scholar
 
7.
M.
Resnick
, et. al.
Commun ACM
52
(
11
),
60
–
67
(
2009
).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
Wikipedia
2018
“Scratch (bahasa pemrograman),”
from https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scratch(bahasa_pemrograman).
9.
J.
Maloney
,
M.
Resnick
,
N.
Rusk
,
B.
Silverman
 and
E.
Eastmond
ACM Trans. Comput. Educ
10
(
4
),
1
–
15
(
2010
).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1868358.1868363
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
10.
M.
Meerbaum-Salant
,
Armoni
 and
M.
Ben-Ari
ICER’10 Proc. Int. Comput. Educ. Res. Work
,
69
–
76
(
2010
).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1839594.1839607
Google Scholar
 
11.
Nanang
 and
A.
Sukandar
,
Mosharafa, J. Pendidik. Mat
9
(
1
),
71
–
82
(
2020
).
https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v9i1.627
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
12.
M. G.
Supiarmo
,
S.
Azizah
,
S.
Putrawangsa
, and
I.
Sujarwo
, in
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika dan Nilai Islami
(
2019
), pp
277
–
84
.
Google Scholar
 
13.
D. T.
Wahyuningtyas
 and
I.
Ladamay
,
Pancaran
5
(
3
),
51
–
60
(
2016
).
Google Scholar
 
14.
Armianti
,
I.
Yani
,
K.
Widuri
, and
Sulistiawati
,
Kreano
7
(
1
),
83
–
90
(
2016
).
https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v7i1.5012
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
15.
H.
Sugiarto
,
Indonesian J. Comput. Inf. Technol
3
(
1
),
26
–
31
(
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
16.
Mustika
,
J. Mikrotik
8
(
1
),
5
(
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
17.
K. C.
Lim
 and
K. E.
Leong
,
21’st Asian Conf. Technol.
Math,
8
(
2017
).
Google Scholar
 
18.
M.
Misfeldt
,
Instrumental Genesis in GeoGebra Based Board Game Design
. In:
Papers for the CERME 8 Conference, Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University. 2013.
Ed. by
B.
Ubuz
,
C.
Haser
,
M. A.
Mariotti
. p.
2664
–
2673
.
19.
C.
Soldano
 and
C.
Sabena
,
Proceedings of the 43rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
(
2019
).
Google Scholar
 
This content is only available via PDF.
©2023 Authors. Published by AIP Publishing.
2023
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.