Zoom become the most widely used application to assist people who work or study from home after the Covid 19 pandemic. Students today are referred to as the Zoom-generation because of their frequent use of Zoom meetings for education. In their view, the use of technology as a learning aid for home study helps them take charge of their own education. Because students learn at different rates and using different methods in a classroom setting, this sets off a chain reaction of different paced learning among them. Consequently, the goal of this result was to find out how students in a self-paced learning environment manage their learning to master mathematical content knowledge. This study approched by the quantitative research and the questionnaire applied to gain data. The reliability of the observed variables was analyzed by the Confirmatory Factor Analysis and the closeness of the relationship between variables was tested by the Structural Equation Model. In the investigation, it was found that students prefer to speed up their learning in order to gain a better understanding of mathematical content. Besides, the Zoom-generation self-guided advancing should be supported by an attention on responsbility for, the executives and observing of learning and expansion of learning.
REFERENCES
1.
Ministry of Education and Culture Circular Letter Number 15 of 2020 Concerning Guidelines for Organizing Learning from Home During an Emergency Period of the Spread of Corona Virus Disease Indonesia
(Kemendikbud
, Jakarta
, 2020
).2.
Z.
Kristóf
, Central European Journal of Educational Research
2
(2
), 84
–92
(2020
).3.
A. P.
Correia
, C.
Liu
and F.
Xu
, Distance Education
41
(4
), 429
–452
(2020
).4.
L.
Corrin
and A.
Bakharia
, “Re-imagining Peer Assessment in Self-Paced Online Learning Environments
,” in Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World
(Springer
, Cham
, 2020
), pp. 197
–212
.5.
C. Y.
Tan
and C.
Dimmock
, The relationships among between-class ability grouping, teaching practices, and mathematics achievement: a large-scale empirical analysis
, Educational Studies
, 1
–19
(2020
).6.
F.
Martin
, B.
Stamper
and C.
Flowers
, Online Learning
24
(2
), 38
–58
(2020
).7.
M.
Zhu
, C. J.
Bonk
and M. Y.
Doo
, Educational Technology Research and Development
, 1
–21
(2020
).8.
A. A.
Silamut
and S.
Petsangsri
, Education and Information Technologies
25
(6
), 4797
–4815
(2020
).9.
S.
Lemmetty
and K.
Collin
, Vocations and Learning
13
(1
), 47
–70
(2020
).10.
B.
Bhandari
, D.
Chopra
and K.
Singh
, Advances in Physiology Education
44
(3
), 383
–386
(2020
).11.
S.
Lemmetty
and K.
Collin
, Vocations and Learning
13
(1
), 47
–70
(2020
).12.
I. I.
Setlhodi
, “The Value of Pacing in Promoting Self-Directed Learning,” in Self-Directed Learning Strategies in Adult Educational Contexts
(IGI Global
, 2019
), pp. 1
–22
.13.
S.
Janakiraman
, S. L.
Watson
and W. R
Watson
, Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research
13
(2
) (2018
).14.
N.
Saeid
, T.
Eslaminejad
, International Education Studies
, 10
(1
):225
–232
(2017
).15.
İ.A.
Tekko
, M.
Demirel
, Frontiers in psychology
, 9
, 2324
(2018
).16.
T.H.
Morris
, International Review of Education
, 65
(4
), 633
–653
(2019
).17.
M.
Fisher
, J.
King
and G.
Tague
, Nurse Education Today
21,
516
–525
(2001
).18.
R. A.
Stewart
, World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education
6
(1
), 59
–62
(2007
).19.
T.
Timothy
, T. S.
Chee
, L. C.
Beng
, C. C.
Sing
, K. J. Hwee
Ling
, C. W.
Li
and C. H.
Mun
, Computers & Education
55,
1764
–1771
(2010
).20.
C.
Fahnoe
and P.
Mishra
, “Do 21st Century Learning Environments Support Self-directed Learning? Middle School Students’ Response to an Intentionally Designed Learning Environment
,” retrieved from: http://punya.educ.msu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/FahnoeMishra-SITE2013-paper.pdf (2013
).21.
R.
Oktaviyanthi
, “Improving Adaptive Reasoning Ability, Decision Making and Independent Learning of Mathematics Education Students Through Self-paced Video Assisted Cognitive Apprenticeship Learning”
, Ph.D. thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
, 2019
.22.
M.
Zhu
and C. J.
Bonk
, Online Learning
23
(4
), 106
–134
(2019
).23.
J.
Broadbent
, E.
Panadero
, J. M.
Lodge
and P.
de Barba
, “Technologies to Enhance Self-Regulated Learning in Online and Computer-Mediated Learning Environments
,” in Handbook of Research in Educational Communications and Technology (Springer, Charm, 2020)
, pp. 37
–52
.24.
J.
Lee
, H. D.
Song
and A. J.
Hong
, Exploring factors, and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning
, Sustainability
11
(4
), 985
(2019
).25.
R.
Broomé
, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology
50
(2
), written by Eugene Mario
DeRobertis
(Brill Academic Publishers
, Leiden
, 2019
), pp. 249
–258
.26.
Y.
Gulbahar
and D.
Yildirim
, “Towards an adaptive learning analytics framework,” In society for information technology & teacher education international conference
(AACE
, 2019
), pp. 1025
–1032
.27.
N.
Melzner
, M.
Greisel
, M.
Dresel
and I.
Kollar
, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
15
(2
), 149
–177
(2020
).28.
H.
Tseng
, X.
Yi
and H. T.
Yeh
, Computers in Human Behavior
95,
179
–186
(2019
).29.
G.
McCarthy
and J.
Milner
, Ability
, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
58
(1
), 149
–170
(2020
).30.
R. M.
Vregelaar
, “Identifying factors for succesful self-managing teams: an evidence-based literature review,”
Bachelor thesis, University of Twente
, 2017
.31.
M. M.
Beck
, R. R.
Lind
, S. S.
Geertsen
, C.
Ritz
, J.
Lundbye-Jensen
and J.
Wienecke
, Frontiers in human neuroscience
10
, 645
(2016
).32.
A. B.
Umetrics
, E.
Johansson
, C.
Wikstorm
, N.
Kettaneth-Wold
, J.
Trygg
, and S.
Wold
, Multi-and Megavariate Data Analysis
(Umetrics Academy
, New York
, 2006
).33.
P.E.
Chan
, K.J.
Graham-Day
, V.A.
Ressa
, M.T.
Peters
, M.
Konrad
, Intervention in School and Clinic
50
(2
), 105
–113
(2014
).34.
C.
Redding
, M.
Cannata
, J.M.
Miller
, Journal of Educational Change
, 19
(1
), 77
–101
(2018
).35.
J.A.
Fredricks
, M.T.
Wang
, J.S.
Linn
, T.L.
Hofkens
, H.
Sung
, A.
Parr
, J.
Allerton
, Learning and Instruction
, 43
, 5
–15
(2016
).36.
37.
S.A.
Stearns
, College teaching
, 65
(2
), 69
–78
(2017
).38.
Y.T.
Lin
, Computers in Human Behavior
, 95
, 187
–196
(2019
).39.
A.A.
Nicol
, S.M.
Owens
, S.S.
Le Coze
, A.
MacIntyre
, C.
Eastwood
, Active Learning in Higher Education
, 19
(3
): 53
–65
(2018
).40.
L.E.
Gin
, F.A.
Guerrero
, K.M.
Cooper
, S.E.
Brownell
, CBE—Life Sciences Education
, 19
(4
), es12
(2020
).41.
N.
Ain
, K.
Kaur
, M.
Waheed
, Information Development
, 32
(5
), 1306
–1321
(2016
).42.
G.
Chopra
, P.
Madan
, P.
Jaisingh
, P.
Bhaskar
, Interactive Technology and Smart Education
16
(2
), 94
–116
(2019
).43.
F.
Tentama
, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education
, 8
(2
), 237
–242
(2019
).
This content is only available via PDF.
©2023 Authors. Published by AIP Publishing.
2023
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.
