This study aims to describe and analyze students’ mathematic literacy referring to learning styles (auditory, visual, and kinesthetic). The method used in this research is descriptive with a qualitative approach. This research was conducted in one of the Christian Junior High Schools in Manado. The subjects in this study were 9 students from 58 students at grades VIII-E and VIII-F, each of three students had auditory, visual and kinesthetic learning styles. The Instruments used in this research are questionnaire of learning style and tests of mathematical literacy. The data analysis was conducted descriptively to portray students’ mathematics literacy referring to learning styles. Furthermore, based on the data analysis that has been done, it can be concluded that: (1) Mathematical literacy ability of students with auditory learning style are in the range of 2nd to 4th levels, this is because students are able to solve mathematical literacy problems in the range of 1st to 4th levels. (2) Mathematical literacy ability of students with visual learning styles are in the range of 3rd to 5th levels, this is because students are able to solve mathematical literacy problems in the range of 1st to 5th levels. (3) Mathematical literacy ability students with kinesthetic learning styles are in the range of 2nd to 3rd levels, this is because students are able to solve mathematical literacy problems in the range of 1st to 3rd levels. This research will have an impact on mathematics education in Indonesia, especially in an effort to improve students’ mathematical literacy skills in terms of students’ learning styles.

1.
J.
Jazimah
,
Jurnal Gentala Pendidikan Dasar
5
,
91
109
, (
2020
).
2.
R. H. N.
Sari
and
A.
Wijaya
,
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika
4
,
100
107
, (
2017
).
3.
Fajriyah
,
Euis
, “
Peran Etnomatematika Terkait Konsep Matematika dalam Mendukung Literasi
,” In:
PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika
[“The Role of Ethnomathematics Related to Mathematical Concepts in Supporting Literacy,” In:
PRISMA, Proceedings of the National Seminar on Mathematics]
(
PRISMA
,
Semarang
,
2018
), pp.
114
119
.
4.
Stecey
and
R
Tuner
,
Assessing Mathematical Literacy: The PISA experience
(
Springer Cham
,
Berlin
,
2015
), pp.
771
790
.
5.
OECD
, What Students Know and Can Do: Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2013
), pp.
37
46
6.
N.
Mansur
, “
Melatih Literasi Matematika Siswa dengan Soal PISA
,”
In: PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika
[“Training Students’ Mathematical Literacy with PISA Problems,” In:
PRISMA, Proceedings of the National Seminar on Mathematics]
(
PRISMA
,
Semarang
,
2018
), pp.
140
144
.
7.
A. L.
Bire
,
U.
Geradus
, and
J.
Bire
,
Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran
44
,
168
174
, (
2014
).
8.
M.
Syawahid
and
S.
Putrawangsa
,
Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika
10
,
222
240
, (
2017
).
9.
Chiou
,
Bo-Chang
and
Chen
,
Chia-Ping
, “
Speech emotion recognition with cross-lingual databases
,” In
Fifteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association
. (
In interspeech
,
Taiwan
,
2014
), pp.
558
561
.
10.
B.F.
Akinyode
and
T.H.
Khan
,
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
9
,
1
13
, (
2016
)
11.
B.
De Porter
and
M.
Hernacki
. Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Menyenangkan, (
Kaifa
,
Bandung
2015
).
12.
B.
De Porter
and
M.
Hernacki
, Quantum Learning.
Edisi Revisi
. (
Kaifa
,
Bandung
2000
).
13.
A.
Priyatna
, Pahami Gaya Belajar Anak! Memaksimalkan Potensi Anak dengan Modifikasi Gaya Belajar [Understand Children’s Learning Styles! Maximizing Children’s Potential with Learning Style Modifications] (
PT Elex Media Komputindo
,
Jakarta
,
2013
), pp.
1
07
.
14.
A.
Kamal
and
S.
Radhakrishnan
,
Educ Inf Technol
24
,
407
435
, (
2019
).
15.
L.
Hartati
,
Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA
3
,
224
235
, (
2013
).
16.
OECD
, PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework, (
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2017
), pp.
78
79
.
17.
A. R.
Hidayah
,
I. A
Hakiki
,
M.F
Afwi
, and
S.
Fiangga
,
Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika
7
,
6
13
, (
2020
).
18.
DU
Sari
,
P.
Adam
,
Kodirun
,
dan
Busnawir
,
Jurnal Pembelajaran Berpikir Matematika, Journal of Mathematics Thinking Learning
6
,
23
34
, (
2019
).
19.
D. N
Sulisawati
,
Lutfiyah
,
F.
Murtinasari
and
L
Sukma
,
Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning
2
,
262
631
, (
2019
).
20.
Edimuslim
,
Suska Journal of Mathematics Education
5
,
95
110
, (
2019
).
21.
M.
Sakinah
and
B.
Avip
, Analisis keterampilan literasi matematika siswa yang dinilai dari gaya belajar siswa [Analysis of students’ mathematical literacy skills assessed from students’ learning styles],
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
, (
IOP Publishing
,
London
,
2021
), pp.
2
9
.
22.
K.
Ozgen
,
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
22
,
91
100
, (
2012
).
23.
Trizulfianto
,
UNION: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
5
,
1
14
, (
2017
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.