This study aimed to produce mathematics teaching materials through Realistic Mathematics Approach (RME) based on Riau Malay weaving culture at junior high schools. In this study, the development of learning tools utilized R&D method using the Dick & Carey model, namely: 1) identifying goals, 2) conducting teaching/instructional analysis, 3) identifying the students’ initial behaviour and characteristics, 4) writing the goals of perfoRMEnce, 5) developing the benchmark reference test, 6) developing learning strategies, 7) developing and selecting teaching tools, 8) designing and implementing foRMEtive tests/evaluations, 9) revising the teaching, and 10) developing summative evaluations. The instruments in this study were validation sheets and students’ response questionnaires to teaching materials. Then, the data were validated by 3 experts, namely a material expert, a language expert, and a design expert. After being validated, the product was tested at two stages: the limited trial and the field trial. The conclusions from the three experts revealed that the teaching materials based on Riau Malay weaving were categorized as Good and it could be used in learning mathematics. Thus, it could be concluded that the mathematics teaching materials with RME approach based on Riau Malay weaving were valid and could be used by students. The impact of this is the production of mathematics teaching materials based on Riau Malay weaving that can be used by students in learning in class, making it easier for students to understand the subject matter.

Topics
Students, Educational institutions, Learning and learning models, Educational assessment, Teaching
1.
Y.
Sa’ada
,
Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik (PMR) Berbasis Cerita Rakyat Melayu Riau di Sekolah Dasar [Development of Mathematics Learning Tools with a Realistic Mathematics Education (PMR) approach based on Riau Malay Folklore in Elementary Schools].
(
Pekanbaru
,
2016
).
Google Scholar
 
2.
D.
Andrian
,
B.
Kartowagiran
, and H. S.,
Int J Instr.
11
,
922
–
934
(
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
3.
A.
Wahyuni
 and
S.
Pertiwi
.
Math Dicatic.
3
,
113
(
2017
).
https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v3i2.61
Google Scholar
 
4.
S.
Rezeki
, “
The sustainability concept of Riau cultures through development of mathematics learning devices based on Riau folklore at elementary Schools
,” in
IOP Conference Proceedings 1538.
(
IOP Publishing
,
Bandung
,
2020
), pp.
1
.
Google Scholar
 
5.
Y.
Riski
,
IT J Res Dev.
215
–
24
(
2021
).
https://doi.org/10.25299/itjrd.2021.vol5(2).5831
Google Scholar
 
6.
Syamsuddin
Udin
. Struktur kaba Minangkabau. (
Pusat Pembinaan Pengembangan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan
,
Jakarta) [
Minangkabau kaba structure.
(Language Development Coaching Center, Ministry of Education and Culture, Jakarta)], pp.
215
. (
1987
)
Google Scholar
 
7.
A.
Wijaya
, Pendidikan Matematika Realistik [
Realistic Mathematics Education]
(
Graha Ilmu Yogyakarta
,
Yogyakarta
,
2012
).
Google Scholar
 
8.
Enmufida
 and
Turmudi
. “
Study ethnomathematics: revealing mathematics ideas on minangkabau traditional weaving songkets in pandai sikek
,” in
IOP Conference Proceedings
1806
. (
IOP Publishing
,
Bandung
,
2020
), pp.
1
–
9
.
Google Scholar
 
9.
M. V. D.
Heuvel-Panhuizen
,
Educ Stud İn Math.
54
,
9
–
35
. (
2003
).
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000005212.03219.dc
Google Scholar
 
10.
V.
Arshaythamby
 and
C. M.
Zubainur
,
J Procedia-social Behav Sci.
159
,
309
–
13
(
2014
).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.378
Google Scholar
 
11.
Vallori
,
J Educ Hum Dev.
3
,
213
(
2014
).
https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v3n4a18
Google Scholar
 
12.
A.
Shoimin
, Model Pembelajaran INOVATIF [
INNOVATIVE Learning Model]
(
Ar-Ruzz Media
,
Yogyakarta
,
2014
).
Google Scholar
 
13.
Sugiyono
, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D [
Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods]
(
ALFABETA
,
Bandung
,
2016
).
Google Scholar
 
14.
L. J.
Burton
 and
S. M.
Mazerolle
.
J Athl Train Educ.
6
,
27
–
35
(
2011
).
https://doi.org/10.4085/1947-380X-6.1.27
Google Scholar
 
15.
Rahim
,
J Math Didactic.
6
,
308
–
20
(
2020
).
https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v6i3.1111
Google Scholar
 
16.
A.
Arseven
,
3
,
973
–
80
(
2015
).
17.
W.
Irvandi
 and H.
J Apotema.
7
,
9
(
2021
).
Google Scholar
 
This content is only available via PDF.
©2023 Authors. Published by AIP Publishing.
2023
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.