Chemistry is conceptual and real, so it creates a lot of misconceptions that are resistant and difficult to change, but can be minimized. This study aims to describe implementation of Learning Cycle 5E model through Cognitive Dissonance strategy based on multiple representations to reduce misconceptions on salt hydrolysis. This research is a quantitative study with a research design using quasi-experimental and One Group Pre-test Post-test design. The research sample consisted of 25 students of class XI MIPA 4 at SMAN 2 Malang. This study used a three tier test diagnostic test of 25 questions that adopted from previous researcher so that its validity and reliability have been tested. The results showed that the average percentage of salt hydrolysis misconceptions decreased after learning activities. The results of analysis of student’s misconceptions in the pretest were 32% and experienced a reduction to 23% in posttest results. This indicated that Learning Cycle 5E through Cognitive Dissonance strategy based on multiple representations is able to minimize the percentage of student’s misconceptions on the salt hydrolysis topic.

1.
K.
Lintong
,
N.
Bialangi
, and
M.
Pikoli
,
Jurnal Entropi
13
,
215
220
(
2018
).
2.
L.
Yunita
,
A.
Sofyan
, and
S.
Agung
,
EDUSAINS
6
, pp.
8
(
2014
).
3.
K.
Orwat
,
P.
Bernard
, and
A.
Migdal-Mikuli
,
Journal of Baltic Science Education.
16
,
64
76
, ISSN 1648-3898 (
2017
).
4.
N. N. S.
Apriani
and
I. W.
Redhana
,
Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia
2
,
70
(
2019
).
5.
T.
Rahmawati
, “
Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa kelas XI SMAN 10 Malang pada materi hidrolisis garam menggunakan soal three tier [Identification of students’ misconceptions of class XI SMAN 10 Malang on salt hydrolysis using three tier questions]
,”
S.Pd. thesis
, State University of Malang,
2017
.
6.
Zainab
and
Sukarmin
,
UNESA Journal of Chemical Education
9
.
387
396
ISSN: 2252-9454 (
2020
).
7.
N. F.
Maratusholihah
,
S.
Rahayu
,
anf F.
Fajaroh
,
Jurnal Pendidikan
2
,
919
926
(
2017
).
8.
A.
Anwarudin
,
M.
Nuswowati
,
N.
Widiarti
,
Journal of Chemistry in Education
8
, ISSN NO 2252-6609 (
2019
).
9.
H.
Labobar
,
P.
Setyosari
,
I. N. S.
Degeng
, and
I. W.
Dasna
,
International Journal of Science and Research IJSR
6
, 2350-2352 ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 (
2017
).
10.
H. R.
Widarti
,
A.
Permanasari
,
S.
Mulyani
,
International Journal of Education
9
,
105
112
(
2017
).
11.
K. J.
Linenberger
and
S. L.
Bretz
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
13
,
172
178
(
2012
).
12.
N.
Sofiyah
,
Jurnal Sains dan Pendidikan Fisika
12
,
128
135
(
2016
).
13.
W.
Wulandari
and
H.
Nasrudin
,
UNESA Journal of Chemical Education
2
,
121
126
(
2013
).
14.
Haeroni
,
Susilawati
, and
S.
Rahayu
,
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi
5
,
83
91
(
2019
).
15.
M.
Taufiq
,
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
1
,
198
203
(
2012
).
16.
Sugiyono
,
Metode Penelitian Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D [Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Research Methods]
(
Alfhabeta
,
Bandung
,
2012
).
17.
N. R. L.
Qodriyah
,
D. A.
Rokhim
, and
H. R.
Widarti
,
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia
14
,
2642
2651
(
2020
).
18.
D.
Pebriyanti
,
H.
Sahidu
, and
Sutrio
,
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi
1
,
92
96
ISSN. 2407-6902 (
2015
).
19.
M.
Ulfah
,
Subandi
, and
Munzil
,
Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia
2
,
9
14
(
2017
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.