The purpose of this study was to analyze the difference between guided inquiry learning and conventional learning on mathematical communication skills in fifth grade elementary school students. The research method used in this research is a quasi-experimental method with a quantitative approach. The experimental design used is a posttest only control group design. The subjects of this study were fifth grade elementary school students in Godong District, Grobogan Regency, Indonesia. Data collection techniques using observation techniques, tests and documentation. The data analysis used includes the prerequisite analysis test, namely the normality test and homogeneity test, the final analysis uses the T test. The results show that there are differences between the guided inquiry learning model and conventional learning to improve the students’ mathematical communication skills. The results of data processing with the t test showed that the guided inquiry learning variable was Sig. (2-tailed) is 0.004 <0.05 then Ho is rejected, and Ha is accepted. It means there is the difference in mathematical communication skills between students who are taught using guided inquiry learning and conventional learning, the average value of guided inquiry learning is 72.71 which is higher than the conventional class of 58.85.

1.
Ibrahim
,
S.
Suparni
,
Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika
, (
Teras
,
Yogyakarta
,
2009
).
2.
N.
Izzati
, and
D.
Suryadi
, “
Komunikasi matematik dan pendidikan matematika realistik
”, In
Prosiding seminar nasional matematika dan pendidikan matematika, Yogyakarta, UNY
,
27
, pp.
721
729
(
2010
).
3.
B.
Joyce
,
M.
Weil
,
E.
Calhoun
,
Models of teaching
, (
Prentice Hall
,
New Delhi
,
2003
).
4.
D.
Ramdani
,
L.
Badriah
, “
Pengaruh Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbasis Blended Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Calon Guru Pada Materi Sistem Pencernaan Manusia
”,
Nat J Kaji Penelitan dan Pendidik dan Pembelajaran.
,
4
(
1
), pp.
397
402
(
2019
).
5.
D. F.
Halpern
,
The Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment,
(
Schuhfried Gmbh
;
Mödling
,
2010
).
6.
I.
Nurdiansyah
,
Sarwi
, and
S.
Haryani
, “
Ethnomathematics Contained of Guided Inquiry for Elementary School Fourth Grade Student
”,
Journal of Primary Education
,
8
(
8
), pp.
160
165
(
2019
).
7.
S.
Amri
and
I. K.
Ahmadi
,
Proses Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Inovatif dalam Kelas
, (
Prestasi Pustaka
,
Jakarta
,
2010
).
8.
W.
Sanjaya
,
Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan
, (
Kencana Prenada Media
,
Bnadung
2019
).
9.
Sumaji
,
C.
Sa’dijah
,
Susiswo
, and
Sisworo
, “
Mathematical Communication Process of Junior High School Students in Solving Problems based on APOS Theory
”,
Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists
,
8
(
1
),
197
221
(
2020
).
10.
S.
Nooryanti
,
S.
Utaminingsih
, and
H. S.
Bintoro
, “
Pengaruh Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Berbasis Etnomatematika terhadap Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar
”,
ANARGYA: J. Ilm. Pendidik. Mat.
3
(
1
), pp.
30
34
(
2020
).
11.
W.
Wahyudin
, “
The Analysis of the Problem of Economic Mathematical Problems Reversed from the Ability of Logic Thinking in Students
”,
International Electron J Math Educ.
12
(
6
), pp.
585
598
(
2017
).
12.
D. A.
Saputro
,
Masrukan
, and
A.
Agoestanto
, “
Mathematical Communication Ability by Grade VII Students Using a Themed Problem Based Learning with Scaffolding on Rectangle Materials
”,
Unnes Journal of mathematics Education
;
6
(
2
), pp.
239
248
(
2017
).
13.
S. M.
Ardiyani
,
G.
Gunarhadi
, and
R.
Riyadi
, “
Realistic Mathematics Education in Cooperative Learning Viewed from Learning Activity
”,
Journal on Math ematics Education
,
9
(
2
):
301
310
(
2018
).
14.
S.
Lindawati
, “
Pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman dan komunikasi matematis siswa sekolah menengah pertama
”,
J Pendidik Mat
,
2
(
2
), pp.
16
29
(
2011
).
15.
R.
Kurani
, and
H.
Syarifuddin
, “
Effectiveness of Mathematics Learning Tools Based on Guided Inquiry Model to Mathematical Communication Capabilities of Class VIII Students
”, In
Jounal of Physics Conferences
,
1554
(
2020
),
012006
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.