This study aims to describe students’ spatial reasoning abilities with the characteristics of Field Dependent and Field Independent in solving problems in geometry. The design of this research is a case study. A total of 33 students were classified based on cognitive style with the GEFT test. Two subjects were taken, each of which had a field-dependent and field-independent cognitive style. Data were collected using the GEFT test for cognitive style determination, spatial reasoning ability tests, and interviews. Instrument validation by one expert and one mathematics teacher. The data analysis process is data collection, data reduction, data display, data presentation under the objectives, verification, and conclusion. Based on the study results, the subject with field-dependent cognitive style has a spatial relationship, but their spatial orientation, mental rotation, and spatial perception are imperfect. The field-dependent subject does not have spatial visualization. Subject with field-independent cognitive style has spatial orientation, mental rotation, and spatial relationships, but they do not have spatial visualization and spatial perception.

1.
Moma
L.
Pengembangan Instrumen Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Untuk Siswa Smp
.
Delta-Pi J Mat dan Pendidik Mat.
2015
;
4
(
1
):
27
41
.
2.
Rahma
A.F
,
Novtiar
C
,
Sugandi
A.I.
Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Kelas Viii Mts Negeri Sukasari Cimahi Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Menggunakan Pendekatan Open-Ended
.
JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Mat Inov.
2018
;
1
(
2
):
139
.
3.
Saefudin
A.A.
Pengembangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI
).
Al-Bidayah.
2012
;
4
(
1
):
37
48
.
4.
Maulana Arifin
A
,
Pujiastuti
H
,
Sudiana
.
Pengembangan media pembelajaran STEM dengan augmented reality untuk meningkatkan kemampuan spasial matematis siswa
.
J Ris Pendidik Mat.
2020
;
7
(
1
):
59
73
.
5.
Fajri
H.N
,
Johar
R
,
Ikhsan
M.
Peningkatan Kemampuan Spasial dan Self-Efficacy Siswa Melalui Model Discovery Learning Berbasis Multimedia
.
Beta J Tadris Mat.
2017
;
9
(
2
):
180
.
6.
Lusyana
E
,
Setyaningrum
W.
van Hiele instructional package for vocational school students’ spatial reasoning
.
Beta J Tadris Mat.
2018
;
11
(
1
):
79
100
.
7.
Piaget
,
J.
, &
Inhelder
B.
The psychology of the child.
2nd ed.
1969
.
8.
Guzel
N
,
Sener
E.
High school students’ spatial ability and creativity in geometry
.
Procedia - Soc Behav Sci.
2009
;
1
(
1
):
1763
6
.
9.
Linn
M.C
,
Petersen
A.C.
Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis
.
Child Dev.
1985
;
56
(
6
):
1479
98
.
10.
Chrysostomou
M
,
Tsingi
C
,
Cleanthous
E
,
Pitta-pantazi
D.
Cognitive Styles and Their Relation to Number Sence and Algebraic Reasoning.
2015
;(October).
11.
Al-Salameh
E.M.
A Study of Al-Balqa’ Applied University Students Cognitive Style
.
Int Educ Stud.
2011
;
4
(
3
):
189
93
.
12.
Yousefi
M.
Cognitive style and EFL learners’ listening comprehension ability
.
Indones J Appl Linguist.
2011
;
1
(
1
):
73
83
.
13.
Fajari
A.F.N
,
Kusmayadi
T.A
,
Iswahyudi
G.
PROFIL POSES BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA KONTEKSTUAL DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD DEPENDENT-INDEPENDENT DAN GENDER Setiap individu adalah seorang pemikir kritis
.
Langkah-langkah proses berpikir kritis untuk membantu sisw. J Pembelajaran Mat.
2013
;
1
(
6
):
639
48
.
14.
Safrina
K
,
Ikhsan
M
,
Ahmad
A.
Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Geometri melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Berbasis Teori Van Hiele
.
J Didakt Mat.
2014
;
1
(
1
):
9
20
.
15.
Ishartono
N
,
Ningtyas
D.A.
Exploring Mathematical Concepts in Batik Sidoluhur Solo
.
Int J Emerg Math Educ.
2021
;
5
(
2
):
151
.
16.
Noor Kholid
M
,
Swastika
A
,
Ishartono
N
,
Nurcahyo
A
,
Lam
T.T
,
Maharani
S
, et al.
Hierarchy of Students’ Reflective Thinking Levels in Mathematical Problem Solving
.
Acta Sci [Internet].
2022
;
24
(
6
):
24
59
. Available from:
17.
Clements
D.H
,
Battista
M.T.
Geometry
and
Spatial
Reasoning
. In
D. A. G. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning
.
New York
:
Macmillian
;
1992
.
420
464
p.
18.
Forndran
A
,
Lowrie
T
,
Harris
D.
Strategy use in mathematics assessment: does spatial reasoning matter? Math Educ Res Impacting Pract Proc 42nd Annu Conf Math Educ Res Gr Australas.
2019
;
276
83
.
19.
Wahidah
N.R
,
Johar
R
,
Zubainur
C.M.
The Elpsa Framework for The Students’ Spatial Reasoning Ability in Aceh
.
Malikussaleh J Math Learn.
2020
;
3
(
1
):
27
.
20.
Dhlamini
Z.B
,
Chuene
K
,
Masha
K
,
Kibirige
I.
Exploring grade nine geometry spatial mathematical reasoning in the South African annual national assessment
.
Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ.
2019
;
15
(
11
).
21.
Yuliardi
R
,
Rosjanuardi
R.
Hypothetical learning trajectory in student’s spatial abilities to learn geometric transformation
.
JRAMathEdu (Journal Res Adv Math Educ.
2021
;
6
(
3
):
174
90
.
22.
Wang
L.
Investigating spatial skills and math anxiety as mediators in a sequential mediation model: A pilot study
.
JRAMathEdu (Journal Res Adv Math Educ.
2021
;
6
(
4
):
388
403
.
23.
Nazhifah
H
,
Masduki
.
KREATIFITAS MAHASISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN
.
Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya II (KNPMP II)
.
2017
.
24.
Haryati
S
,
Masduki
,
Kholid
M.N.
GAYA BERPIKIR MATEMATIKA SISWA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SOAL CERITA.
2016
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Published by AIP Publishing.
You do not currently have access to this content.