This research aims to describe the problem-solving ability of grade X vocational students in solving matrix problems. The study uses a qualitative descriptive approach with grade X students at one of the state vocational schools in Boyolali Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. Subjects are selected by the purposive sampling technique. Research instruments consist of test questions and interview guidelines. Data is obtained through tests, interviews, and documentation. With triangulation methods and data analysis that include data collection, data reduction, data display, and conclusion withdrawal got results that show that: 1) students with a low level of problem-solving ability can go through all four stages of problem-solving well, 2) students with a moderate level of problem-solving ability are experiencing obstacles in the second stage and do not carry out the fourth stage, and 3) low-skilled students are only the first stage that can be done correctly, The second and third stages are experiencing obstacles, while the fourth stage cannot be done. The four stages in question are the stages of problem-solving according to Polya, which include: the first stage (understanding the problem), the second stage (devising a plan), the third stage (carrying out the plan), and the fourth stage (looking back). The results of this study can be used as evaluation material to improve students’ problem-solving skills, especially in math subjects.
REFERENCES
1.
Fitriyani
D
, Nurhikmayati
I.
Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Literacy Errors Based on Newman’s Procedures [Analisis Kesalahan Literasi Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Prosedur Newman.]
. Proceedings of the national seminar [Internet].
2020
;61
–72
. Available from: http://prosiding.unma.ac.id/index.php/semnasfkip/article/view/3022.
National Research Council
. Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education.
National Academies Press
; 1989
. 31
–35
p.3.
Kelly
D.L
, Centurino
V.A.S
, Martin
M.O
, Mullis
I.V.S
, editors. TIMSS 2019 Encyclopedia: Education Policy and Curriculum in Mathematics and Science.
2020
.4.
Haji
S.
Diagnosis of students’ difficulties in solving story problems in class V of Surabaya Experimental State Elementary School [Diagnosis kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita di kelas V SD Negeri Percobaan Surabaya]
. IKIP Malang
; 1994
.5.
Polya
G.
How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method 2nd edition.
NJ
: Princeton University Press
; 1973
.6.
Charles
R
, Lester
F
, O’Daffer
P.
How to evaluate progress in problem solving.
Reston, VA, USA
: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Inc
:; 1987
.7.
Pamungkas
, Martasari
C
, Susanto
H.P
, Meifiani
N.I.
Analysis of errors in solving matrix problems in class X smk students [Analisis kesalahan dalam menyelesaikan soal matriks pada siswa kelas X SMK]
. J Edumatic.
2020
;1
(1
).8.
Shadiq
F.
Mathematics Learning [Pembelajaran Matematika]
. Yogyakarta
: Graha Ilmu
; 2014
.9.
Ariyanto
, Pasrianto
O.
Improving Students’ Ability in Solving Mathematical Problems through a Cooperative Learning Model type Number Heads Together in building Spaces (Cubes and Blocks) [Peningkatan Kemampuan Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Number Heads Together pada bangun Ruang (Kubus dan Balok)]
. J Pendidik.
2013
;22
(3
):233
–40
.10.
Putri
R.I
, Santosa
R.H.
The effectiveness of react strategies is in terms of learning achievement, problem solving ability, mathematical connections, self-efficacy [Keefektifan strategi react ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan penyelesaian masalah, koneksi matematis, self efficacy]
. J Ris Pendidik Mat.
2015
;2
(2
):262
.11.
Shadiq
F.
Learn to Solve Math Problems [Belajar Memecahkan Masalah Matematika]
. Yogyakarta
: Graha Ilmu
; 2014
.12.
13.
Kristofora
M
, Sujadi
. Analysis of errors in solving mathematical problems using polya steps of junior high school grade VII students [Analisis kesalahan dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika dengan menggunakan langkah polya siswa kelas VII SMP]
. J Prism Univ Suryakancana.
2017
;6
(1
):9
–16
.14.
Widodo
S.A
, Istiqomah
, Leonard
, Nayazik
A
, Prahmana RCI. Formal student thinking in mathematical problem-solving
. J Phys Conf Ser.
2019
;1188
(1
).15.
Yuwono
T
, Rambu
Y.
Analysis of Student Errors In Solving Story Problems Based on Newman ’ s Stage In Class VII Analysis of Student Errors In Solving Story Problems Based On Newman ’ s
Stage In Class Vll.
In 2021
. p. 59
–67
.16.
Jayanti
M.D
, Irawan
E.B
, Irawati
S.
Contextual Problem Solving Ability of High School Students in Row and Row Materials [Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Siswa SMA pada Materi Barisan dan Deret]
. J Pendidik Teor Penelitian, dan Pengemb.
2018
;3
(5
):671
–8
.17.
Rejeki
S
, Setyaningsih
N
, Toyib
M.
Using LEGO for learning fractions, supporting or distracting?
In: AIP Conference Proceedings.
2017
.18.
Murtiyasa
B
, Rejeki
S
, Setyaningsih
R
, Merdekawati
A.
Students’ Thinking in Solving Geometric Problems Based on PISA Levels
. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
2019
.19.
Yuherni
, Maimunah
, Yunita
P.
Contextual-Based Mathematics Teaching Materials on Function Materials to Improve Mathematical Problem Solving Ability [Bahan Ajar Matematika Berbasis Kontekstual pada Materi Fungsi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis]
. AKSIOMA J Progr Stud Pendidik Mat.
2020
;9
(4
):1293
–306
.20.
Lestiana
H.T
, Rejeki
S
, Setyawan
F.
Identifying Students’ Errors on Fractions
. JRAMathEdu (Journal Res Adv Math Educ.
2017
;1
(2
):131
–9
.21.
Stylianou
D.A.
On the interaction of visualization and analysis: The negotiation of a visual representation in expert problem solving
. J Math Behav.
2002
;21
(3
):303
–17
.22.
Dimasindel
M.R.
Performances and Skills of Cotabato City’s Mathematics Pre-service Teachers in Problem Solving
. Southeast Asian Math Educ J.
2017
;7
(2
):3
–16
.23.
Son
A.L
, Darhim
, Fatimah
S.
An analysis to student error of algebraic problem solving based on polya and newman theory
. J Phys Conf Ser.
2019
;1315
(1
).24.
Leong
Y.H
, Toh
T.L
, Tay
E.G
, Quek
K.S
, Dindyal
J.
Relooking “Look Back”: A student’s attempt at problem solving using Polya’s model
. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol.
2012
;43
(3
):357
–69
.25.
Novianti
D.E.
Profile of solving mathematical problems in solving linear programming problems in terms of students’ mathematical communication skills [Profil pemecahan masalah matematika dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan pemrograman linear ditinjau dari kemampuan komunikasi matematis mahasiswa]
. JIPM (Jurnal Ilm Pendidik Mat.
2017
;6
(1
):53
.26.
Rosita
I
, Abadi
A.P.
Mathematical Problem Solving Capabilities Based on Polya Steps [Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Berdasarkan Langkah-Langkah Polya]
. In: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Sesiomadika 2019.
2019
. p. 1059
–65
.27.
Annizar
A.M
, Maulyda
M.A
, Khairunnisa
G.F
, Hijriani
L.
Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in Solving PISA Problems on Geometry Topics [Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA pada Topik Geometri]
. J Elem.
2020
;6
(1
):39
–55
.28.
Hendriana
H
, Rohaeti
E.E
, Sumarmo
U.
Hard skills dan soft skills matematika siswa
. Bandung
: PT. Reflika Aditama
; 2017
.29.
Aharony
J
, Wang
J
, Yuan
H.
Tunneling as an incentive for earnings management during the IPO process in China
. J Account Public Policy.
2010
;29
(1
):1
–26
.
This content is only available via PDF.
©2023 Authors. Published by AIP Publishing.
2023
Author(s)
Published by AIP Publishing.
You do not currently have access to this content.
