The river Ganges largest tributary is river Yamuna and it’s the longest tributary in India serving millions of individuals. In this paper we investigated the ongoing trends in basic water quality guidelines of the River Yamuna which shows huge deviation in Delhi segment. When river Yamuna enters Delhi, it meets the water quality guidelines Class C with respect to Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) but during its exit the water quality deteriorated. After Wazirabad the DO decreases drastically and remains drastic downstream, it was observed most of the time well below the prescribed limit of 4 mg/L and ranges from 0.0 – 10.5 mg/L. The BOD values were also critical usually not meeting the prescribed limit of 3 mg/L and ranges from 1.3 – 61.8 mg/l. The TC values were significantly superior to the prescribed limit of 5000 MPN/100 ml and ranges from 10000 - 920000000 MPN/100 mL. Analysing the values of DO, BOD and TC according to river classification the river Yamuna comes under Class E for the Delhi segment. Due to the influence of industrialization, urbanization, and horticultural advances the Delhi segment gets severely contaminated. The dilution capacity of the river also gets reduced due to significant water abstraction. The chief contributor of contamination in Yamuna River is National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi followed by Agra. The DO, BOD in the Delhi segment in river Yamuna represent that regardless of the considerable number of endeavors the water quality isn’t fit for assigned best utilizations. The outcomes require inventive points of view in the advancement of a refreshed comprehensive preservation technique for the river Yamuna.

1.
Ali
,
I.
and
Jain
,
C.K.
, (
2001
).
Pollution potential of toxic metals in the Yamuna River in Delhi, India
,
Journal of environmental hydrology.
Volume
9
, pp.
1
9
.
2.
Asit
Nema
, (
2007
),
Japanese Assistance for River Pollution Control - A Case Study of Yamuna Action Plan, India, YAP working paper.
3.
CPCB
,
1999
.
Water quality status of Yamuna River Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
,
New Delhi, India
.
4.
CPCB
,
2006
.
Water quality status of Yamuna River Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
,
New Delhi, India
.
5.
CPCB
,
2007
.
Water quality status of Yamuna River Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
,
New Delhi, India
.
6.
CPCB
,
2008
.
Water quality status of Yamuna River Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
,
New Delhi, India
.
7.
CPCB
,
2009
.
Water quality status of Yamuna River Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
,
New Delhi, India
.
8.
CPCB
,
2010
.
Water quality status of Yamuna River Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
,
New Delhi, India
.
9.
CPCB
,
2011
.
Water quality status of Yamuna River Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
,
New Delhi, India
.
10.
CPCB
,
2012
.
Water quality status of Yamuna River Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
,
New Delhi, India
.
11.
CPCB
,
2013
.
Water quality status of Yamuna River Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
,
New Delhi, India
.
12.
CPCB
,
2014
.
Water quality status of Yamuna River Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
,
New Delhi, India
.
13.
CPCB
,
2015
.
Water quality status of Yamuna River Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
,
New Delhi, India
.
14.
CPCB
,
2016
.
Water quality status of Yamuna River Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
,
New Delhi, India
.
15.
CPCB
(
2008
).
Status of water quality in India. Central Pollution Control Board
,
New Delhi, India
.
16.
CPCB
(
2010
).
Status of water quality in India. Central Pollution Control Board
,
New Delhi, India
.
17.
Jain
,
C.K.
, (
2004
).
Metal fractionation study on bed sediments of Yamuna River, India, Water Research.
Volume
38
, pp.
569
578
.
18.
Maheshwari
,
A.
,
Sharma
,
M.
and
Sharma
,
D.
, (
2011
).
Hydro Chemical Analysis of Surface and Ground Water Quality of Yamuna River at Agra, India
,
Journal of Materials and Environment Science
. Volume
2
, No.
4
, pp.
373
378
.
19.
Mazhar
,
Mohd
Aamir
,
Nadeem A.
Khan
,
Afzal Husain
Khan
,
Sirajuddin
Ahmed
,
Asif Ali
Siddiqui
,
Azhar
Husain
,
Vineet
Tirth
et al “
Upgrading combined anaerobic-aerobic UASB-FPU to UASB-DHS system: Cost comparison and performance perspective for developing countries
.”
Journal of Cleaner Production
284
(
2021
):
124723
.
20.
Ritchie
,
J.C.
,
Zimba
,
P.V.
and
Everritt
,
J.H.
, (
2003
).
Remote sensing techniques to assess water quality
.
Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing
, Volume
69
, pp.
695
704
.
21.
Sharma
,
A.P.
,
Das
,
M.K.
,
Samanta
,
S.
,
Paul
,
S.K.
,
Bhowmick
,
S.
, (
2014
).
The Ecology and Fishery Status of Yamuna River
,
Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute Indian Council of agricultural Research Barrackpore
,
Kolkata, West Bengal
, Bulletin No. 184.
22.
Suthar
,
S.
,
Nema
,
A.K.
,
Chadukdhara
,
M.
,
Gupta
,
S.K.
, (
2009
).
Assessment of metals in water and sediments of Hindon River, India: Impact of industrial and urban discharges
,
Journal of Hazardous Materials
, Volume
171
, pp.
1088
1095
.
23.
Upadhyay
,
R.
,
Dasgupta
,
N.
,
Hasan
,
A.
,
Upadhyay
,
S.K.
, (
2010
).
Managing water quality of Yamuna River in NCR Delhi Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Parts A/B/C 01/2011
. Volume
36
. No.
9-11
, pp.
372
378
.
24.
Parween
,
M.
,
Ramanathan
,
A.
&
Raju
,
N. J.
Waste water management and water quality of river Yamuna in the megacity of Delhi
.
Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.
14
,
2109
2124
(
2017
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.