This paper examines the strong interrelationship between assumed technology and mission performance requirements for NEP. Recent systems analysis efforts by NASA, DOE, and various contractors are used to project achievable system performance as a function of technological sophistication for two piloted Mars mission applications. Specific mass regimes for each collection of technologies are presented as a function of power level for piloted applications. Low thrust mission analyses are presented which relate these system performance projections to achievable mission performance. Mission performance ‘‘maps’’ are constructed which link prime mission figures‐of‐merit of time and initial mass with system requirements on power level and specific mass, and hence technology. Both opposition and conjunction class piloted Mars missions are presented for the 2016 opportunity, analogous to those proposed in the ‘‘90‐Day Study’’ and ‘‘Synthesis’’ architecture studies. Mass and time breakdowns are presented for 10 MWe piloted and 5 MWe cargo point designs.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
10 January 1993
Proceedings of the tenth symposium on space nuclear power and propulsion
10−14 Jan 1993
Albuquerque, New Mexico (USA)
Research Article|
January 10 1993
Piloted Mars mission planning: NEP technology and power levels
Jeffrey A. George;
Jeffrey A. George
NASA Lewis Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Rd., M.S. AAC‐2, Cleveland, Ohio 44135
Search for other works by this author on:
Kurt J. Hack;
Kurt J. Hack
NASA Lewis Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Rd., M.S. AAC‐2, Cleveland, Ohio 44135
Search for other works by this author on:
Leonard A. Dudzinski;
Leonard A. Dudzinski
NASA Lewis Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Rd., M.S. AAC‐2, Cleveland, Ohio 44135
Search for other works by this author on:
Leon P. Gefert;
Leon P. Gefert
NASA Lewis Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Rd., M.S. AAC‐2, Cleveland, Ohio 44135
Search for other works by this author on:
James H. Gilland
James H. Gilland
Sverdrup Technology, Inc., NASA Lewis Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Rd., M.S. AAC‐2, Cleveland, Ohio 44135
Search for other works by this author on:
AIP Conf. Proc. 271, 493–500 (1993)
Citation
Jeffrey A. George, Kurt J. Hack, Leonard A. Dudzinski, Leon P. Gefert, James H. Gilland; Piloted Mars mission planning: NEP technology and power levels. AIP Conf. Proc. 10 January 1993; 271 (1): 493–500. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.43190
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Inkjet- and flextrail-printing of silicon polymer-based inks for local passivating contacts
Zohreh Kiaee, Andreas Lösel, et al.
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Students’ mathematical conceptual understanding: What happens to proficient students?
Dian Putri Novita Ningrum, Budi Usodo, et al.
Related Content
Nuclear Electric Propulsion: A “Better, Safer, Cheaper” Transportation System for Human Exploration of Mars
AIP Conference Proceedings (July 1994)
‘‘Fast track’’ lunar NTR systems assessment for NASA’s first lunar outpost and its evolvability to Mars
AIP Conference Proceedings (January 1993)
Reducing the risk to Mars: The gas core nuclear rocket
AIP Conference Proceedings (January 1998)
High risk low cost Mars missions scenarios
AIP Conference Proceedings (January 1998)
Effect of NTP technology levels on engine sizing for a 2005 piloted Mars mission
AIP Conference Proceedings (January 1993)