A and B are two Private Universities (PTS) established by Persyarikatan Muhammadiyah. A and B have an official website that is a source of information and services for the academic community and prospective community members. A and B’s official website service is expected to facilitate various groups who need information and educational services. Therefore the quality of information and services available must be available properly to obtain information and services quickly and precisely. In the development of tertiary institutions, official websites’ role has an essential role as the face of these universities in cyberspace. Almost all universities in Indonesia have used official websites because there will be competition between universities in terms of website quality. In this study, researchers compared the quality of the A’s website with B’s website based on the user’s perspective using the WebQual 4.0 method and Modified Importance Performance Analysis (MIPA). The sample selection uses a Purposive Sampling approach and uses the Bernoulli formula. Respondents who participated in this study were 80 respondents. As a result, the B’s website is better than the A’s website. This result is evidenced by the 16 attributes of the 23 A’s website attributes superior. And as many as eight attributes need to be repaired immediately by the A’s website manager. From the analysis of the factors of use of technology, human resources, and website work units, B is superior to the A’s website.

1.
D. B.
Napitupulu
,
Buletin Pos dan Telekomunikasi
14
,
51
(
2016
).
2.
M.
Rahman
,
A.
Khan
, and
N.
Islam
,
J. Hum. Soc. Sci Res.
1
,
9
(
2013
).
3.
D. P.
Restuputri
, and
W. F.
Mufti
,
J. Tek. Ind.
15
,
136
44
(
2016
).
4.
S. R.
Arifin
,
E.
Nugroho
, and
B. S.
Hantono
,
Analisis kualitas layanan website Universitas Hasanuddin dengan metode WebQual 4.0 modifikasi
(
Universitas Gadjah Mada
,
Yogyakarta
,
2015
).
5.
W.
Abbas
,
Analisa kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap website Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (UNY)
Prosiding SNST Fakultas Teknik
1
(
2013
).
6.
A.
Hafiz
, in
Proc. Semin. Nas. Darmajaya
(
2017
), pp.
443
57
.
7.
A. P.
Kurniawan
,
Pengukuran kualitas website Universitas Telkom menggunakan metode WebQual 4.0 Conf. Electr. Eng. Telemat. Ind.l technol. Creat. Media (CENTIVE
(
2018
)),
5
.
8.
N. M.
Yaghoubi
,
H.
Armesh
,
R.
Azadavar
,
H.
Nasrabadi
, and
H.
Khajooei
,
African J. Bus. Manag.
5
,
12031
(
2011
).
9.
U. D. C.
Leonidio
,
R. M. D. S.
Montezano
, and
F. A.
Carvalho
,
J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manag.
8
,
109
(
2011
).
10.
E. T.
Loiacono
,
R. T.
Watson
, and
D. L.
Goodhue
,
WebQual: A measure of website quality Marketing theory and applications
,
13
,
432
(
2002
).
11.
E.
Cristobal
,
C.
Flavian
, and
M.
Guinaliu
,
Managing service quality: An international journal
(
2017
).
12.
S.
Kothainayaki
,
K.
Sivakumaren
, and
S.
Gopalakrishnan
,
User preferences on university websites: A study (Library Philosophy and Practice
,
2012
).
13.
A.
Isman
and
O.
Isbulan
,
Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol.
9
,
243
(
2010
).
14.
M.
Iqbal
and
N. F.
Warraich
,
Pakistan J. Inf. Manag. Libr.
13
(
2016
).
15.
L. M.
VandeCreek
,
International digital library perspectives
, (
2005
).
16.
Y. –M.
Kim
,
Information Technology and Libraries
,
30
(
2011
).
17.
J.
Bernier
,
M.
Barchéin
,
A.
Cañas
,
C.-V.
Gómez
, and
J. Merelo. Ser. Soc. la Educ.
9
,
1746
(
2002
).
18.
O.
Osunade
and
C. O.
Ogundele
,
Transnatl. J. Sci. Technol.
2
,
66
(
2012
).
19.
S.
Kaur
,
K.
Kaur
, and
P.
Kaur
, in
Int. Conf. Comput. Sustain. Glob. Dev. (INDIACom
(
2016
),
1043
.
20.
C. M.
Madere
, in
Public Relations Quarterly
,
52
,
17
(
2018
).
21.
Y. –M.
Kim
,
J. Acad. Librariansh
,
37
,
9
(
2011
).
22.
E.
Şengel
and
S.
Öncü
, in
Procedia-Social Behav. Sci.
2
,
890
(
2010
).
23.
S. D.
Harumi
,
J. Magister Psikol. UMA
8
,
115
(
2016
).
24.
I.
Megawati
,
J. Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrep.
11
,
13
(
2017
).
25.
S. K.
Dewi
,
J. Teknik Industri
20
,
94
(
2019
).
26.
H. A.
Rasyid
,
J. Ecodemica: J. Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Bisnis
1
,
210
(
2017
).
27.
R.
Lupiyoadi
,
Manajemen pemasaran jasa
2018
).
28.
S. J.
Barnes
and
R. T.
Vidgen
,
J. Electron. Commer. Res.
3
,
114
(
2002
).
29.
S. J.
Barnes
and
R. T.
Vidgen
, in
Proc. 34th annu. Hawaii int. conf. syst. sci.
(
2001
),
10
.
30.
B. C.
Shia
,
M.
Chen
, and
A. D.
Ramdansyah
,
Am. J. Ind. Bus. Manag.
6
,
28
(
2016
).
31.
U.
Yavas
and
D. J.
Shemwell
,
Int. J. Health Care Quality Assurance
, (
2001
).
32.
H.
Jogiyanto
,
Metodologi penelitian sistem informas
(
Penerbit Andi
,
Yogyakarta
,
2008
).
33.
I. N.
Sudjana
,
Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan
(
Sinar Baru
,
Bandung
,
2004
).
34.
T.
Suprapto
,
Pengantar teori & manajemen komunikasi
(
Media Pressindo
,
2009
).
35.
K.
Rahayuni
,
M.
Yunus
, and
R.
Fadil
,
J. Ris. Phys. Educ.
6
,
17
(
2015
).
36.
F. B.
Al Abid
and
A. R.
Karim
, in
Int. Conf. Comput. Netw. Informatics (ICCNI)
,
1
(
2017
).
37.
T. P.
Handayani
,
Rancang bangun sistem keamanan pintu rumah menggunakan switch magnetik dengan monitoring Web Bootstrap berbasis Raspberry Pi
Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya
, (
2015
).
38.
A.
Aziz
and
T.
Tampati
,
Analisis Web Server untuk Pengembangan Hosting Server Institusi: Pembandingan Kinerja Web Server Apache dengan Nginx
,
13
, (
2015
).
39.
A.
Saputra
,
Membangun Aplikasi Toko Online dengan PHP dan SQL
(
Elex Media Komputindo
,
Jakarta
,
2013
).
40.
A.
Solichin
,
Pemrograman web dengan PHP dan MySQL
(
Budi Luhur
,
2016
).
41.
A. G.
Andreou
,
A. A.
Dykman
,
K. D.
Fischl
,
G.
Garreau
,
D. R.
Mendat
,
G.
Orchard
,
IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst. (ISCAS
2016
),
2911
.
42.
H.
Yuliansyah
,
J. Inform.
8
,
826
, (
2014
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.