This study was aimed to measure the goats’ responses to silage of local forage (Brachiaria mutica and Gliricidia sepium) and urea palm sugar block (UPSB) supplementation. Importance of this study was to obtain the best goat’s feed formulation in order to ensure the goat’s productivity. We conducted this study in three months, and involved 16 local 12-months-male goats, with an average weight of 25 kg. The treatment rations were arranged as follows: R0 = control (B.mutica), R1 = silage (80% B.mutica + 20% G.sepium) + 300 grams UPSB, R3 = silage (70% B.mutica + 30% G.sepium) + 300 grams of UPSB and R4 = silage (60% B.mutica + 40% G.sepium) + 300 grams of UPSB. Parameters observed were dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG) and blood metabolic status. All data were presented in tabular form using completely randomized design (CRD) with four treatments and four replications. We analyzed results using covariance analysis. If there was a significant or very significant difference among treatments, Duncan’s multiple range tests was applied. Analysis of covariance showed the administration of silage (B. mutica and G.sepium) and UPSB supplementation had a very significant effect (p <0.01) on DMI. Post hoc analysis showed the R3 treatment was significantly different (p < 0.01) compared to other treatments (R0, R1 and R2). This study showed the ADG ranged rom 42.20 to 110.18 gram/head/day. Administration of silage (B. mutica and G. sepium) and UPSB supplements in goat showed a very significant effect (p<0.01) on ADG. Post hoc analysis showed the R3 treatment was significantly different (p < 0.01) compared to other treatments. Analysis of variance showed that the administration of silage (B. mutica and G. sepium) and UPSB supplementation had a very significant effect (p<0.01) on the blood metabolic status of goats. R3 treatment was significantly different in post-hoc analysis compared to other treatments (R0, R1 and R2). We concluded that the goats response optimally to the administration of silage (B. mutica 60%+G.sepium 40%) + 300 grams of UPSB.

1.
Central Bureau of Statistics
.
2019
.
Goat Meat Production by Province 2009-2018
, https://www.bps.go.id/dynamictable/2015/12/18/1042/hasil-daging-kambing-menurut-provinsi-2009-2018.html, accessed 19 September 2019.
2.
R B
Udding
,
Nohong
and
Munir
,
Journal of GalungTropika
3
,
201
207
(
2014
)
3.
Lestariningsih
,
MY
Yasin
,
M.
Khomarudin
,
AF
Hadiarto
.
2020
.
Scientific Journal of Fillia Cendekia
5
(1)
,
2598
-
6325
(
2020
)
4.
S.
Yanuartono
,
A.
Indarjulianto
,
H.
Nururrozi
,
Purnamaningsih
,
S.
Raharjo
,
Veterinary Journal
20
(3)
3445
451
(
2019
)
5.
C.L.
Kaunang
and
S.
Sane
, “Kadar mineral dalam darah dan jumlah mikroba rumen kambing yang diberi suplemen urea gula aren blok (UGB)”,
Research report, LPPM Unsrat, Manado
,
2016
6.
R.G.D
Steel
and
J.H.
Torrie
. Statistical Principles and Procedures, (
Gramedia Pustaka Utama
,
Jakarta
,
2003
)
7.
A.
Jaelani
,
T.
Rostini
,
M.I.
Zakir
,
Jonathan, Animal Science
12
(2)
76
85
(
2014
)
8.
E.M.
Aregheore
,
D.
Parera
,
M.S.
Yahaya
,
Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica
33
(2)
, 63 70 (
2002
).
9.
A.A.
Mubi
,
A.
Kibon
,
D.
Mohammed
,
Agric Biol JN Am
4
(3)
205
215
(
2013
)
10.
E.
Nursasih
, “Digestibility of nutrients and feed efficiency in Etawah Crossbreed goats fed rations with different fiber sources”,
Essay, Faculty of Animal Husbandry
.
Bogor Agricultural Institute
.
Bogor
,
2012
.
11.
D.
Agustina
,
J. Mathematics, Science and Technology
2
,
101
106
(
2013
)
12.
N.W.
Siti
,
Sucipta IGMA, Mudita IM, Partama IBG, Cakra IGLO, Agripet
12
(2)
,
49
54
(
2012
)
13.
R.M.
Kojo
,
Rustandi
,
Y.R.L.
Tulung
and
SS
Malatantang
,
Zootek Journal
,
35
(1)
,
21
29
(
2015
).
15.
M.
Choubey
,
M.
Wadhwa
,
M.P.S.
Bakshi
,
Buffalo Bulletin
34
(1)
,
5
16
(
2015
).
16.
C.L.
Kaunang
, and
S.
Sane
,
J. LPPM Science and Technology
5
(1)
(
2018
) Vol 5 No.1
17.
A.
Olmedo-Juarez
, R.
Rojo
,
A.Z.M. Salem
;
J.F.
Vazquez-Armijo
,
S.
Rebollar-Rebollar
,
B.
Albarran
,
J.
Lugo
,
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems
15
,
71
75
(
2012
)
18.
E.R.
Orskov
,
M.
Ryle
,
Energy Nutrition in Ruminants
, (
lisevier Applied Science
,
London
,
1990
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.