Lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) is a mesoscale numerical method suitable for incompressible fluid flow simulations and its popularity has increased in recent years. It is applicable for many engineering applications dealing with fluid flow and the method can be fully parallelised which is beneficial for calculation on CPU clusters or GPUs. In this paper, the LBM is tested on the benchmark geometry of a constricted tube to verify the laminar-turbulent transition, which can appear in many engineering and biological systems (lungs, arteries). The motivation for this study is to identify suitable models for simulation of human airways which consists of several bifurcations and constricted channels. For this research, the CPU cluster Salomon from IT4Innovations was used. The flow regime through a cosine-curved constriction given by Reynolds number 2000 was simulated with the Lattice Boltzmann Smagorinsky subgrid model. To reveal the unsteady flow character, a period of 5 seconds was simulated. The results of the time-averaged (last 2 seconds) axial velocities on the tube axes and at 6 determined cross sections in the post-stenotic part were compared with already published CFD simulations using the conventional finite volume method FVM (several LES and RANS turbulence models) and experimental data. To reduce numerical errors caused by discretization, the grid independent test for different three types of geometries was done. The LBM predicts the velocities in the wall vicinity well, but in the constriction the velocities are higher and it underestimates the velocities in the core flow behind the constriction compared to the remaining models and experimental data. At the moment, the results from this benchmark simulation will be used for education purposes. However, it is also the initial step for the application of the LBM to solve the flow through the human airways and the deposition of aerosols there.

1.
S. A.
Ahmed
and
D. P.
Giddens
, “
Velocity measurements in steady flow through axisymmetric stenoses at moderate reynolds numbers
,”
Journal of Biomechanics
16
,
505
516
(
1983
).
2.
J.
Elcner
,
F.
Lizal
,
J.
Jedelsky
,
J.
Tuhovcak
, and
M.
Jicha
, “
Laminar-turbulent transition in a constricted tube: Comparison of reynolds-averaged navier–stokes turbulence models and large eddy simulation with experiments
,”
Advances in Mechanical Engineering
11
(
2019
).
3.
S.
Gokaltun
and
G.
Dulikravich
, “
Lattice boltzmann computations of incompressible laminar flow and heat transfer in a constricted channel
,”
Computers Mathematics with Applications
59
,
2431
2441
(
2010
).
4.
C.
Cercignani
, “The boltzmann equation,” in
The Boltzmann Equation and Its Applications
(
Springer New York
,
New York, NY
,
1988
) pp.
40
103
.
5.
P.
Rosenau
, “
Extending hydrodynamics via the regularization of the chapman-enskog expansion
,”
Phys. Rev. A
40
,
7193
7196
(
1989
).
6.
S.
Hou
,
J.
Sterling
,
S.
Chen
, and
G.
Doolen
, “
A lattice boltzmann subgrid model for high reynolds number flows
,”
arXiv: Cellular Automata and Lattice Gases
(
1994
).
7.
P.
Nathen
,
D.
Gaudlitz
,
J.
Kratzke
, and
M.
Krause
, “
An extension of the lattice-boltzmann method for simulating turbulent flows around rotating geometries of arbitrary shape
,” (
2013
).
8.
M.
Krause
,
S.
Avis
,
H.
Kusumaatmaja
,
D.
Dapelo
,
M.
Gaedtke
,
N.
Hafen
,
M.
Haußmann
,
J.
Jeppener-Haltenhoff
,
L.
Kronberg
,
A.
Kummer-länder
,
J.
Marquardt
,
T.
Pertzel
,
S.
Simonis
,
R.
Trunk
,
M.
Wu
, and
A.
Zarth
, “
OpenLB Release 1.4: Open Source Lattice Boltzmann Code
,” (
2020
).
9.
M.
Krause
,
A.
Kummerländer
,
S.
Avis
,
H.
Kusumaatmaja
,
D.
Dapelo
,
F.
Klemens
,
M.
Gaedtke
,
N.
Hafen
,
A.
Mink
,
R.
Trunk
,
J.
Marquardt
,
M.
Maier
,
M.
Haussmann
, and
S.
Simonis
, “
OpenLB–Open source lattice Boltzmann code
,”
Computers & Mathematics with Applications
81
,
258
288
(
2021
).
10.
J.
Smagorinsky
, “
General Circulation Experiments with the Primitive Equations
,”
Monthly Weather Review
91
,
99
(
1963
).
11.
E. R.
van Driest
, “
On turbulent flow near a wall
,”
Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences
23
,
1007
1011
(
1956
).
12.
N.
Franck
and
F.
Ducros
, “
Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor
,”
Flow Turbulence and Combustion
62
,
183
200
(
1999
).
13.
F.
Menter
, “
Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications
,”
AIAA Journal
32
,
1598
1605
(
1994
).
14.
T.-H.
Shih
,
W. W.
Liou
,
A.
Shabbir
,
Z.
Yang
, and
J.
Zhu
, “
A new k-ε eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows
,”
Computers Fluids
24
,
227
238
(
1995
).
15.
T.
Krüger
,
H.
Kusumaatmaja
,
A.
Kuzmin
,
O.
Shardt
,
G.
Silva
, and
E. M.
Viggen
,
The Lattice Boltzmann Method - Principles and Practice
(
Switzerland
:
Springer
,
2016
).
16.
G. P.
Association
,
Physical properties of glycerine and its solutions
(
1963
).
17.
W. H. Z. A. . J. H.
Solzbach
, U., “
Effect of stenotic geometry on flow behaviour across stenotic models
,”
Medical biological engineering computing
25
,
543
550
(
1987
).
18.
S. S.
Varghese
,
S. H.
Frankel
, and
P. F.
Fischer
, “
Direct numerical simulation of stenotic flows. part 1. steady flow
,”
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
582
,
253
280
(
2007
).
19.
Z.
Zhang
and
C.
Kleinstreuer
, “
Laminar-to-turbulent fluid–nanoparticle dynamics simulations: Model comparisons and nanoparticle-deposition applications
,”
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
27
,
1930
1950
(
2011
).
20.
E. Lév
êque
,
F.
Toschi
,
L.
Shao
, and
J.-P.
Bertoglio
, “
Shear-improved smagorinsky model for large-eddy simulation of wall-bounded turbulent flows
,”
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
570
,
491
502
(
2007
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.