The need for sustainable energy has made it important to study several alternative renewable energy sources. It has also been discovered that the current pandemic conditions have caused more hospital visits, thereby, leading to the production of more liquid wastes. One of the methods usually used to treat this hospital wastewater is electrocoagulation which removes dissolved pollutants and also produces hydrogen as part of its products. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the opportunity of using the hydrogen produced from the electrocoagulation process of hospital wastewater as an alternative source of renewable energy. The observations were made on a laboratory scale using ciprofloxacin antibiotic and methylene blue solution as samples of the waste. The results showed the best product is the hydrogen gas accumulated when using aluminum electrodes in the electrocoagulation process of antibiotic and methylene blue solutions for 4 hours with a solution pH of 10. A total of 97.85.10−3 mmol hydrogen gas or 0.2% by volume of the waste solution was produced from processing 1 liter of waste solution. Further research is, however, recommended on the utilization of wastewater treatment through the electrocoagulation process as a source of hydrogen.

1.
Lipman
,
T.
, An overview of hydrogen production and storage systems with renewable hydrogen case studies. Prepared for the Clean Energy States Alliance. 
Montpelier
,
Vermont citing US DOE data
,
2011
.
11
.
2.
Ogden
,
J.M.
, Review of small stationary reformers for hydrogen production. 
Report to the international energy agency
,
2001
.
609
.
3.
Fukushima
,
K.
and
T.
Ogawa
,
Conceptual design of a hydrogen production system by DME steam reforming and high-efficiency nuclear reactor technology.
2003
.
4.
Kalamaras
,
C.M.
and
A.M.
Efstathiou
.
Hydrogen production technologies: current state and future developments
. in
Conference papers in science
.
2013
.
Hindawi
.
5.
Slama
,
R.B.
,
Comp. Water Energy Environ. Eng.
2
(
2
), pp.
54
58
(
2013
).
6.
Yuvaraj
,
A.
and
D.
Santhanaraj
,
Mater. Res.
,
17
(
1
), pp.
83
87
(
2014
).
7.
Santos
,
D.M.
,
C.A.
Sequeira
, and
J.L.
Figueiredo
,
Química Nova
,
36
pp.
1176
1193
, (
2013
).
8.
Naje
,
A.S.
, et al,
Rev. Chem. Eng.
,
33
(
3
), pp.
263
292
, (
2017
).
9.
Canizares
,
P.
, et al,
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
,
44
(
12
) pp.
4178
4185
(
2005
).
10.
Saravanan
,
M.
,
N.P.
Sambhamurthy
, and
M.
Sivarajan
,
CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water
,
38
(
5-6
) pp.
565
571
, (
2010
).
11.
Santos
,
L.M.
, et al,
J. Brazilian Chem. Soc.
,
26
(
9
), pp.
1817
1823
, (
2015
).
12.
Mollah
,
M.Y.
, et al,
J. Hazard. Mater.
114
(
1-3
): p.
199
210
(
2004
).
13.
Adeogun
,
A.I.
and
R.B.
Balakrishnan
,
Appl. Water Sci.
,
7
(
4
), pp.
1711
1723
, (
2017
).
14.
Vallance
,
C.
,
An Introduction to Chemical Kinetics
. (
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
,
2017
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.