In the context of innovative development of agrarian education, the article seeks the possibilities of improving the quality of specialist training through introduction of innovative scaffolding methodology into educational settings. The article deals with the problem of the development of terminological literacy as part of professional competence in veterinary students. Particular attention is paid to the specifics of terminological literacy of veterinarians. International term elements of Latin and Greek origin are essential for building in-depth terminological knowledge and skills. The article gives the description of structural components and indicators of terminological literacy, the levels of its development. The authors suggest a model of the development of terminological literacy in veterinary students in the process of their professional training. The model is based on the scaffolding ideas about the adjusted personalised support, dynamic assessment of students’ performance, transfer of responsibility and intersubjectivity. The model consists of four interconnected components: learning objectives, content, methodology and assessment. The implementation of the proposed model ensures the improvement of terminological literacy in students in the context of terminological training of future veterinarians. Also, it ensures the development of students’ independent learning skills and enhances their responsibility for the learning outcomes. The model has its practical significance for agrarian education as it allows improvement of the learning content and change of teaching strategies in the classroom with the emphasis on terminological training.

1.
M. P.
Shchetinin
,
Key factors in the development of agrarian education Transcript of parliamentary hearings on the topic November,
10
(
2017
). http://council.gov.ru/media/files/vt7bS 6om1aPL7On3RuqtG0m7UUZcYV6J.pdf
2.
I. V.
Kulamikhina
,
E. A.
Abrosimova
,
Zh. B.
Esmurzaeva
,
V. V.
Galkina
and
D. B.
Kovaleva
, “
Proposing a conceptualization of terminological training in veterinary education
”,
Eur. Proc. of Soc. and Behav. Sc. Proc. of the Intern. Conf. (LEASECON 2020)
113
,
135
42
(
2021
). doi:
3.
N. V.
Bordovskaya
and
E. A.
Koshkina
, “
Structural and functional model of terminological competence of a specialist
”,
Bull. of St. Petersb. St. Univ. 16 Psych. Ped.
4
,
97
109
(
2016
). doi:
4.
E. Ya.
Sokolova
, “
Formation of the basics of terminological literacy in the process of teaching a professional foreign language
”,
Worl. of Ling. and Comm
171
6
(
2014
). http://www.tverlin gua.ru
5.
M. A.
Tikhomirova
,
Psychological factors for students to master didactic terminology Dissertation of Candidate of Psychological Sciences (St. Petersburg
), (
2017
).
6.
O. V.
Shidlovskaya
,
Terminological literacy as an important component in the formation of the professional competence of a future doctor (based on the Latin clinical terminology of transplantology
),
J. of Grodno St. Med. Univ.
4
(
17
),
474
77
(
2019
) DOI:
7.
M. B.
Musokhranova
,
T. Ya.
Orlyanskaya
and
K. I.
Nesterova
, “
Pedagogical approaches to the formation of the basics of terminological literacy as a condition for maintaining the continuity of biomedical knowledge
”,
Mod. Probl. of Sci. and
Ed.
3
, (
2019
) http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=28912
8.
A. Z.
Ibatova
and
I. G.
Mukhametgaliyev
, “
New ways of professional language thesaurus formation among students of engineering specialties
XLinguae
,
4
(
11
),
22
31
(
2018
). DOI:
9.
M. L.
Kuryan
and
E. A.
Voronina
, “
Use of pedagogic support (scaffolding) in teaching students 183 effective feedback
”,
Tomsk St. Univ. J.
461
,
183
91
(
2020
). DOI:
10.
K. R.
Koedinger
and
V.
Aleven
,
Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors
,
Ed. Psych. Rev.
3
(
19
),
239
64
(
2007
).
11.
R. D.
Pea
, “
The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity
”,
J. of the Learn. Sci.
,
3
(
13
),
423
51
(
2004
).
12.
B. R.
Belland
, “
Instructional scaffolding: foundations and evolving definition
”,
In Instructional scaffolding in STEM education (Cham: Springer),
17
53
(
2017
). DOI:
13.
J.
Van de Pol
,
M.
Volman
and
J.
Beishuizen
, “
Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: a decade of research
”,
Ed. Psych. Rev
,
3
(
22
),
271
96
(
2010
). DOI:
14.
J.
Van de Pol
,
M.
Volman
,
F.
Oort
and
J.
Beishuizen
,
The effects of scaffolding in the classroom: support contingency and student independent working time in relation to student achievement, task effort and appreciation of support
Instruc. Sci.,
5
(
43
),
615
41
(
2015
). DOI :
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.