Selecting a process for welding large scale equipment on site demands special expertise due to the numerous variables to be considered. This paper is aims for applying a decision support methodology to the selection of a welding process for a 16000 cubic meter storage tank welded on site. Five welding processes are chosen to select from, namely, Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW), Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW), Submerged Arc Welding (SAW), Flux Cord Arc Welding (FCAW) and Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW). To reach this goal a methodology of combining Quality Function Deployment (QFD) with two Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) which are Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and a modified version of Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations PROMETHEE II which is Extended PROMETHEE II (EXPROM2). The analytical result showed that (SMAW) is the optimum welding process.

1.
Pasternak
H.
,
Krausche
T.
,
Launert
B.
Welded construction site joints in bridges
.
In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Steel Bridges
;
2015
.
2.
Al-Mendwi
K. A. K.
,
Doos
Q.M.
Optimal Welding Process Selection to Fabricate Crude Oil Filter Tower Joints By Integration of Multi Criteria Decision Making Processes
.
Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research and Developments (JMERD)
.
2019
;:
42
(
4
),
102
107
.
3.
Al-Mendwi
K. A. K.
Computer Aided Selection of Materials by use of Ashby's charts: A Balance State by Dimensionless Ranking
.
The 6th Engineering Conference, Volume III, Mechanical & Nuclear Engineering
,
University of Baghdad
,
Iraq
.
2009
;: Vol.
5
, no.
7
, pp.,
391
399
.
4.
Yazdani
M.
,
Kahraman
C.
,
Zaraté
P.
,
Onar
S.C.
 A fuzzy multi attribute decision framework with integration of QFD and grey relational analysis.
ExpertSystemswithApplications
,
Elsevier
.
2019
;:
115
, pp.
474
485
.
5.
Kizielewicz
B
,
Sałabun
W.
A New Approach to Identifying a Multi-Criteria Decision Model Based on Stochastic Optimization Techniques
.
Symmetry.
2020
;:
12
,
1551
.
6.
ODU
GO
.
Weighting Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making Technique
.
Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management.
2019
;: Vol.
23
(
8
)
1449
1457
.
7.
Simamora
B.
,
Amril
A.
,
Utami
I.W.
,
Parwati
K.S.M.
,
Adhitya
W.R.
,
Afriany
J.
, et al. Decision support system using PROMETHEE Algorithm.
In Materials Science and Engineering
;
2021
:
IOP Publishing
. p.
1088
, 012003.
8.
Goswami
S.S.
Outranking Methods: PROMETHEE I and PROMETHEE II
.
Foundations of Management.
2020
;: Vol.
12
.
9.
Hanumaiah
N.
,
Ravi
B.
,
Mukherjee
N.P.
Rapid hard tooling process selection using QFD-AHP methodology
.
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.
2006
;: Vol.
17
No.
3
, pp.
332
350
.
10.
Balasubramanian
V.
,
Varahamoorthy
R.
,
Ramachandran
C.S.
,
Muralidharan
C.
Selection of welding process for hardfacing on carbon steels based on quantitative and qualitative factors
.
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.
2009
;:
40
(
9
),
887
897
.
11.
Al-Mendwi
K. A. K.
,
Doos
Q.M.
Evaluation of Arc Welding Process Practical Capability According to Joint Design Requirements
.
Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research and Developments.
2020
;: Vol.
43
, No.
3
, pp.
406
419
.
12.
Ižaríková
G.
Supplier planning with analytical hierarchy process
.
Acta Tecnología.
2019
;:
5
(
4
),
103
107
.
13.
Athawale
V.M.
,
Chakraborty
S.
A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection
.
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations.
2011
;:
2
,
831
850
.
14.
Saaty
T.L.
,
Tranb
L.T.
On the Invalidity of Fuzzifying Numerical Judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process
.
Process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling.
2007
;:
46
(
7-8
),
962
975
.
15.
Franceschini
F.
Advaned Quality Fanction Deployment Boca Raton
:
ST. Lucie Press, A CRC Press Company
;
2002
.
16.
Oakland
J.S.
 Total Quality Management, text with cases. Third Edition ed.
Amsterdam
:
Butterworth-Heinemann
, an imprint of Elsevier;
2003
.
17.
Oakland
J.S.
 Oakland on Quality Management 
Amsterdam
:
Butterworth-Heinemann
, an imprint of Elsevier;
2004
.
18.
Oakland
J.S.
,
Marosszeky
M.
 Total Qulaity in the Construction Supply Chain 
Amsterdam
:
Butterworth-Heinemann
, an imrint of Elsevier;
2006
.
19.
Klochkov
Y.
,
Volgina
A.
,
Klochkova
E.
,
Dementiev
S.
Human Factor In Quality Function Deployment
.
Second International Symposium on Stochastic Models in Reliability Engineering, Life Science and Operations Management
.
2016
;: 978-1-4673-9941-8/16.
20.
Abdulrazzaq
M.A.
Utilizing Quality Function Deployment with Fuzzy Logic for Enhancing Product Planning. Doctoral dissertation
.
Baghdad
,
Iraq
:;
2011
.
21.
Klochkov
Y.
,
Gazizulina
A.
,
Ostapenko
M.
Development of QFD methodology
.
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering.
2019
;:
618
,
012083
.
22.
Fadlina
,
Sianturi
L.T.
,
Karim
A.
,
Mesran
,
Siahaan
A.P.U.
Best Student Selection Using Extended Promethee II Method
.
International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering & Research (IJRTER)
.
2017
;: Volume
03
, Issue
08
; August.
23.
Zhang
H.j.
,
Zhou
Y.
,
Gan
Q.h.
An Extended PROMETHEE-II-Based Risk Prioritization Method for Equipment Failures in the Geothermal Power Plant
.
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.
2019
;:
21(i8
),
2490
2509
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.