This paper aims to apply the decision-making approach to the selection of electricity generators in educational institutions. The method used in this research is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). AHP method is used in the initial stages, to identify and determine the criteria weights through pairwise comparison analysis. Then the TOPSIS method is used to weigh the alternatives to produce priority order. The results showed that there were eight criteria used to choose an electric generator: price, warranty, capacity, maintenance costs, ease of service, reliability, durability, and noise level. The application of these two methods is proven to be able to help decision-makers to solve problems by utilizing non-numeric and numeric data sources to produce the best solutions in the selection of alternatives.

1.
J.
Rezaei
,
A.
Hemmes
, and
L.
Tavasszy
,
J. Air Transp. Manag.
61
,
95
105
(
2017
).
2.
V.
Dukhanin
,
R.
Topazian
, and
M.
Decamp
,
Int. J. Heal. Policy Manag.
7
,
889
903
(
2018
).
3.
C.
Lin
,
G.
Kou
,
Y.
Peng
, and
F. E.
Alsaadi
,
Ann. Oper. Res.
,
1
17
(
2020
).
4.
H.
Aulawi
,
W. A.
Kurniawan
,
D. M.
Arifin
, and
E. J.
Hayat
,
IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.
434
,
012248
(
2018
).
5.
E.
Terzi
,
Southeast Eur. J. Soft Comput.
8
, (
2019
).
6.
S.
Kheybari
,
F. M.
Rezaie
,
S. A.
Naji
, and
F.
Najafi
,
J. Clean. Prod.
232
,
257
65
(
2019
).
7.
J.
Chen
,
C.
Wang
, and
J.
Chen
,
IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif.
4
,
563
76
(
2018
).
8.
S.
Mishra
,
R. D.
Raut
,
B. E.
Narkhede
,
B. B.
Gardas
, and
P.
Priyadarshinee
,
Int. J. Manag. Concepts Philos.
11
,
94
(
2018
).
9.
M.
Fabjanowicz
,
M.
Bystrzanowska
,
J.
Namieśnik
,
M.
Tobiszewski
, and
J.
Płotka-Wasylka
,
Microchem. J.
142
,
126
34
(
2018
).
10.
Z. D. Unutmaz
Durmuşoğlu
,
Technol. Soc.
54
,
41
6
(
2018
).
11.
Z.
Haghighi
,
J. C. Ortiz
Lizcano
,
O.
Isabella
,
A.
van den Dobbelsteen
,
T.
Konstantinou
, and
M.
Zeman
, “
Assessment of the Suitability of Different Photovoltaic Cell Technologies for Product Development of Building Integrated Solutions Using the Hierarchy Process (AHP)
,”
International Solar Energy Society (ISES)
(
2019
), pp.
1
10
.
12.
S.
Abadi
,
M.
Huda
,
B.
Basiron
,
S. Suhaila
Ihwani
,
K. Azmi
Jasmi
,
A.
Hehsan
,
J.
Safar
,
A. Kilani
Mohamed
,
W. Hassan Wan
Embong
,
A. Marzuki
Mohamad
,
S. Shakib Mohd.
Noor
,
D.
Novita
,
A.
Maseleno
,
R.
Irviani
,
M.
Idris
, and
M.
Muslihudin
,
Int. J. Eng. Technol.
7
,
238
(
2018
).
13.
G. K.
Koulinas
,
P. K.
Marhavilas
,
O. E.
Demesouka
,
A. P.
Vavatsikos
, and
D. E.
Koulouriotis
,
Saf. Sci.
112
,
96
104
(
2019
).
14.
A. Alami
Merrouni
,
F. Elwali
Elalaoui
,
A.
Mezrhab
,
A.
Mezrhab
, and
A.
Ghennioui
,
Renew. Energy
119
,
863
73
(
2018
).
15.
O.
Dengiz
and
M.
Usul
,
EURASIAN J. SOIL Sci.
7
,
20
9
(
2018
).
16.
A.
Cahyapratama
and
R.
Sarno
, “
Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) methods in singer selection process
,” In
2018 International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT)
(
IEEE
,
2018
), pp.
234
239
.
17.
R. K.
Bhatnagar
and
L. N.
Kanal
,
Machine Intelligence and Pattern Recognition
4
,
3
26
(
1986
).
18.
K. P.
Yoon
and
W. K.
Kim
,
Expert Syst. Appl.
89
,
266
72
(
2017
).
19.
N. M.
Scala
,
J.
Rajgopal
,
L. G.
Vargas
, and
K. L. S.
Needy
,
Gr. Decis. Negot.
25
,
355
72
(
2016
).
20.
M. S.
Rao
and
P. J.
Pawar
,
Materials today: proceedings
5
,
27166
27170
(
2018
).
21.
R.
Karim
and
C. L.
Karmaker
,
Am. J. Ind. Eng.
4
,
7
13
(
2016
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.