The presence of a chemistry practicum module is important for the implementation of practicum in the vocational school. The practicum module is needed so practicum can run smoothly, learning objectives can be achieved, and reduce the risk of work accidents. On the other hand, the use of chemicals in the school is still quite large and the utilization of organic waste as practicum material is still limited. There is a need for an environmental friendly and integrated chemistry practicum procedure. Therefore, it is necessary to have an environmentally friendly chemistry practicum innovation for the subject of Organic Material Analysis in vocational high school. This research aims to develop an environmental friendly chemistry practicum module that utilizes fruit waste as practicum material for the production of ethanol, acetic acid and ethyl acetate. The integrated chemistry procedure is introduced in this practicum which uses products from the first practicum (ethanol) as a reactant for the production of the second practicum (acetic acid) and the third practicum (ethyl acetate). This is a research and development with ADDIE development model. The validity of the environmental friendly chemistry practicum module was assessed by validators; the effectiveness of the module was evaluated based on the score of students’ practicum reports; and the practicality of the module was evaluated from students’ responses using questionnaire. The environmental friendly chemistry practicum module is very valid criteria with an average percentage of 94.672%; very effective criteria based on the score of students’ reports with an average score of 87.515; and very practical with an average percentage of 90.555%. It can be concluded that the environmental friendly chemistry practicum module is valid, effective and practical. The environmental friendly chemistry practicum module can help the students for conducting experiments and promote students’ attitude concern towards the environment.

Topics
Materials analysis, Students, Educational institutions, Learning and learning models, Schools
1.
S.
 
Sugiharti
 and
M. K.
 
Sugandi
,
Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP UNMA
 
45
–
51
(
2020
).
2.
Z.
 
Shana
 and
E. S.
 
Abulibdeh
,
Journal of Technology and Science Education
 
10
(
2
),
199
(
2020
).
https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.888
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
3.
N.
 
Rustaman
,
Seminar Pendidikan Biologi
,
1
–
21
(
2003
).
4.
L.
 
Walunguru
,
M. K.
 
Mone
 and
J.
 
Abdullah
,
Partner
 
23
(
2
),
758
–
772
(
2018
).
https://doi.org/10.35726/jp.v23i2.318
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
5.
H.
 
Furqan
,
Yusrizal
 and
Saminan
,
Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia
 
4
(
2
) (
2016
).
Google Scholar
 
6.
R. V.
 
Listyarini
,
Pamenang
 
F.
,
J.
 
Harta
,
L.
 
Wijayanti
,
M.
 
Asy’ari
 and
W.
 
Lee
,
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
 
8
(
3
),
371
–
378
(
2019
).
Google Scholar
 
7.
R. V.
 
Listyarini
,
F. D. N.
 
Pamenang
 and
N. K.
 
Dewi
,
Scientiae Educatia
 
9
(
1
),
14
(
2020
).
https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v9i1.6283
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
S.
 
Maesarah
,
B. A.
 
Nufida
 and
Raehanah
,
Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia
 
5
(
2
),
67
–
73
(
2017
).
Google Scholar
 
9.
Herliati
,
Sefaniyah
 and
A.
 
Indri
,
Jurnal Teknologi
 
6
(
1
),
1
–
10
(
2018
).
https://doi.org/10.31479/jtek.v6i1.1
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
10.
N.
 
Rachmawati
 and
F. A.
 
Nurlaily
,
Indonesian Journal of Material Chemistry
 
2
(
2
),
67
–
70
(
2019
).
Google Scholar
 
11.
T. E.
 
Lidiawati
,
C.
 
Saleh
 and
A.
 
Alimuddin
,
PROSIDING SEMINAR KIMIA
,
82
–
86
(
2019
).
12.
R.
 
Patel
 and
H. N.
 
Pandya
,
IJARIIE
 
1
(
2
),
58
–
60
(
2015
).
Google Scholar
 
13.
Y.
 
Li
,
D.
 
He
,
D.
 
Niu
 and
Y.
 
Zhao
,
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng
 
38
(
5
),
863
–
872
(
2015
).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1329-8
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
14.
T. J.
 
Plomp
 and
N.
 
Nieveen
,
Proceedings of the Seminar Conducted at the East China Normal University
,
23
–
26
(
2007
).
15.
R. M.
 
Branch
,
Instructional design: The ADDIE approach.
(
Springer
,
New York
,
2009
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
16.
E. W.
 
Laksono
,
E.
 
Rohaeti
,
Suyanta and Irwanto, Jurnal Kependidikan
 
1
(
1
),
100
–
110
(
2017
).
Google Scholar
 
17.
M. K.
 
Majdi
,
B.
 
Subali
 and
Sugianto
,
Unnes Physics Education Journal
 
7
(
1
),
81
–
90
(
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
18.
S.
 
Arikunto
,
Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik.
(
Rineka Cipta
,
Jakarta
,
2013
).
Google Scholar
 
19.
A.
 
Sudjono
,
Pengantar statistik pendidikan.
(
Rajawali Press
,
Jakarta
,
2010
).
Google Scholar
 
20.
W.
 
Zaahirah
 and
Kusrini
,
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika
 
3
(
3
),
252
–
258
(
2014
).
Google Scholar
 
21.
Slameto
,
Evaluasi pendidikan.
(
Bumi Aksara
,
Jakarta
,
2001
).
Google Scholar
 
22.
E. I.
 
Riyanti
,
Jurnal Litbang Pertanian
 
28
(
3
),
101
–
110
(
2009
).
Google Scholar
 
23.
F. B.
 
Amtiran
,
I.
 
Gauru
 and
F. K.
 
Serangmo
,
Jurnal Teknik Mesin
 
2
(
1
),
1
–
6
(
2019
).
Google Scholar
 
24.
R.
 
Nurismanto
,
T.
 
Mulyani
 and
D. I. N.
 
Tias
,
Jurnal Rekapangan
 
8
(
2
),
149
–
155
(
2014
).
Google Scholar
 
25.
W.
 
Kusmawati
,
Jurnal Filsafat, Sains, Teknologi, dan Sosial Budaya
 
23
(
1
),
67
–
72
(
2017
).
https://doi.org/10.33503/paradigma.v23i1.371
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
26.
Silfia
 and
S.
 
Agustini
,
Jurnal Dinamika Penelitian Industri
 
25
(
2
),
117
–
124
(
2014
).
Google Scholar
 
27.
M. N.
 
Fakhry
 and
S. S.
 
Rahayu
,
Jurnal Rekayasa Proses
 
10
(
2
),
64
–
69
(
2016
).
https://doi.org/10.22146/jrekpros.33339
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
28.
N.
 
Sudjana
,
Penelitian dan penulisan pendidikan.
(
Sinar Baru Algesindo
,
Bandung
,
2011
).
Google Scholar
 
29.
Rochmad
,
Jurnal Kreano
 
3
(
1
),
59
–
72
(
2012
).
Google Scholar
 
30.
F.
 
Elsa
,
Khairil
 and
Y.
 
Yunus
,
Jurnal Biotik
 
2
(
1
),
28
–
32
(
2014
).
https://doi.org/10.22373/biotik.v2i1.232
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2022 Author(s).
2022
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.