The use of student’s worksheets based on problem based learning was expected to enable students to have problem solving skills and provide opportunities for students to think and work together (collaboration skills) during learning. This study aimed to describe the teacher’s need for student’s worksheets based on problem-based learning to support the chemistry learning process in the classroom. The type of research is descriptive evaluation, the subjects of evaluation in this study are chemistry teachers, the instruments used in this study were interviews and descriptive data analysis. The results showed that student’s worksheet based on problem-based learning were rarely used in the learning process, mostly using textbooks, androids, and PPT/LCD projectors. Making student worksheets based on problem-based learning required a long-time allocation in compiling various concepts according to the syntax of the problem-based learning model so that teachers felt less interested in making student worksheets based on problem-based learning. Meanwhile, at the time of application, the teacher must understand and master the student worksheets based on problem-based learning because it must be explained first to students before being done so that students understand how to work on student worksheets based on problem-based learning.

1.
G.
Sirhan
,
Journal of Turkish Science Education
,
4
(
2
) (
2007
).
2.
D. F.
Treagust
,
International Journal Science Education
,
25
(
11
),
1353
1368
(
2015
)
3.
S.
Cai
,
X.
Wang
, and
F.A.
Chiang
,
Computers in Human Behavior
37
(
3
),
31
40
(
2014
).
4.
S.
Rahayu
,
A.
Chandrasegaran
, and
D.
Treagust
,
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
9
(
6
),
1439
1458
(
2011
).
5.
A. J.
Rotherham
and
D.
Willingham
,
Educational Leadership
,
67
(
1
),
16
21
(
2009
).
6.
S. S.
Choo
,
J. I.
Rotgans
,
E. H.
Yew
, and
H. G.
Schmidt
,
Advances in health sciences education
,
16
(
4
),
517
528
(
2011
).
7.
M.
Hugerat
and
N.
Kortam
,
Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
10
(
5
),
447
454
(
2014
).
8.
S. S.
Jansson
,
M. H.
derstr
,
P. L.
Andersson
,
M. L.
Nording
,
Journal of Chemical Education
,
92
(
12
),
2080
2086
(
2015
).
9.
R. R. T.
Wasonowati
,
T.
Redjeki
, and
S. R. D.
Ariani
,
Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia
,
3
(
3
),
66
75
(
2014
).
10.
E.
Rohaeti
,
E. W.
LFX
, and
R. T.
Padmaningrum
,
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan
,
10
(
1
),
1
11
(
2009
).
11.
S.
Febriani
,
J.
Sudomo
, dan
W.
Setianingsih
,
Journal of Science Education Research
,
1
(
1
),
1
4
(
2017
).
12.
N.
Ragilia
,
A.
Ambarita
, and
N. E.
Rusminto
,
Journal of Research & Method in Education
,
8
(
1
),
65
72
(
2018
).
13.
A.
Szabo
and
N.
Hastings
,
Computers and Education
,
35
(
35
),
175
187
(
2000
).
14.
R.
Bartsch
and
K.
Cobern
,
Computers and Education
,
41
(
1
),
77
86
(
2003
).
15.
I.
Lukman
,
M.
Damanik
,
S.
Silaban
, and
A.
Kembaren
,
Journal of Transformative Education and Educational Leadership
,
1
(
1
)
23
28
(
2019
).
16.
J. R.
Mergendoller
,
N. L.
Maxwell
, and
Y.
Bellisimo
,
Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning
,
1
(
2
),
49
69
(
2006
).
17.
B.
Akcay
,
Journal of Turkish Science Education
,
6
(
1
),
28
38
(
2009
).
18.
T.
Cemal
and
T.
Yavuz
,
Chemistry Education Research and Practice
,
14
,
36
50
(
2013
).
19.
T.
Cemal
and
T.
Yavuz
,
Chemistry Education Research and Practice
,
14
,
36
50
(
2013
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.