Progressive development of intellectual and expert information systems in plant agriculture requires more fundamental knowledge about local land agro- and ecosystem unique features, especially for regions with extreme climate conditions like Northern Asia. Each farm agriculture complex needs a lot of specific customization for digital technology applications which rises a need for effective knowledge base organization to perform an efficient data analysis and simulation modelling. For this purpose, conceptual modeling of spatial land characteristics was conducted using semantic network model. Formal modeling language UML was applied to fix 46 classes, attributes and relations as main abstract objects for agriculture land characteristic ontologies. Basing on which and independently of expert knowledge, a variety of 11 218 UML methods was designed and described. Upon expert consideration of the research, 7 types of data dependencies were classified, each of them allowing to calculate one given land characteristic using collected data for other ones. Results reveal clear classification of trajectories to build a digital image of agricultural land saving all possible variants for simulation modeling interpretations. Generalized semantic network for agricultural intellectual information system development is presented containing 36 basic entities and separating real agriculture from its digital image.

1.
J.
Zhang
,
G.
Ding
,
Y.
Zou
, et al. “
Review of job shop scheduling research and its new perspectives under Industry 4.0
,”
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
30
,
1809
1830
(
2019
).
2.
G. Q.
Toffolini
,
M-H.
Jeuffroy
,
p.
Mischler
, et al. “
Farmers’ use of fundamental knowledge to re-design their cropping systems: situated contextualisation processes
,”
NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences
80
,
37
47
(
2017
).
3.
J.W.
Jones
,
J.M.
Antle
,
B.O.
Basso
, et al. “
Towards a new generation of agricultural system models and knowledge products: state of agricultural systems science
,”
Agricultural systems
155
,
269
288
(
2017
).
4.
G.
Bannerjee
,
U.
Sarkar
,
S.
Das
, et al. “
Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture: A Literature Survey
,”
International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer science Applications and Management Studies
7
(
2018
).
5.
R.
Ackoff
. “
Fundamentals of Operation Research
,”
John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York
,
1968
.
6.
A.
Ahmad
,
M.
Shehzadi
,
S. A.
Wajid
, et al. “
Understanding the Agricultural Systems Modeling: A Review
,”
International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering
10
,
2241
2248
(
2021
).
7.
M. A.
Zamora-Izquierdo
,
J.
Santa
,
J. A.
Martínez
, et al. “
Smart farming IoT platform based on edge and cloud computing
,”
Biosystems engineering
,
177
,
4
17
(
2019
).
8.
L.
Hannah
,
C. I.
Donatti
,
C. A.
Harvey
, et al. “
Regional modeling of climate change impacts on smallholder agriculture and ecosystems in Central America
,”
Climatic Change
141
,
29
45
(
2017
).
9.
G.
Schuh
,
R.
Anderl
,
R.
Dumitrescu
,
A.
Krüger
,
M.
ten Hompel
(Eds.). “Industrie 4.0 Maturity Index. Managing the Digital Transformation of Companies – UPDATE 2020 – (acatech STUDY), ”
Munich
,
2020
.
10.
M. L.
Brodie
,
J.
Mylopoulos
,
J. W.
Schmidt
(Eds.). “On conceptual modelling: Perspectives from artificial intelligence, databases, and programming languages,” –
Springer
,
New York
,
2012
.
11.
B.
Drury
,
R.
Fernandes
,
M. F.
Moura
, et al. “
A survey of semantic web technology for agriculture
,”
Information Processing in Agriculture
6
487
501
(
2019
).
12.
S.
Liu
,
Y.
Yang
,
J.
Forrest
. “Grey Data Analysis,”
Springer
,
Singapore
,
2017
.
13.
D. p.
Holzworth
,
N. I.
Huth
,
p. G.
de Voil
 et al. “
APSIM – Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation
,”
Environmental Modelling & Software
62
,
327
350
(
2014
).
14.
A.
de Wit
,
H.
Boogaard
,
D.
Fumagalli
 et al. “
25 years of the WOFOST cropping systems model
,”
Agricultural Systems
168
,
154
167
(
2019
).
15.
C.
Rosenzweig
,
J. W.
Jones
,
J. L.
Hatfield
 et al. “
The agricultural model intercomparison and improvement project (AgMIP): protocols and pilot studies
,”
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
170
,
166
182
(
2013
).
16.
J. W.
Jones
,
G.
Hoogenboom
,
C. H.
Porter
, et al. “
The DSSAT cropping system model
,”
European Journal of Agronomy
18
,
235
265
(
2003
).
17.
T.
Gong
,
L.
Shuai
,
M.
Zhang
. “
Modelling language evolution: Examples and predictions
”,
Physics of Life Reviews
11
,
280
302
(
2014
).
18.
R. V.
Guha
,
D.
Brickley
,
S.
Macbeth
. “
Schema.org: evolution of structured data on the web
,”
Communications of the ACM
59
,
44
51
(
2016
).
19.
M.
Ozkaya
. “
Are the UML modelling tools powerful enough for practitioners? A literature review
,”
IET Software
13
,
338
354
(
2019
).
20.
Unified Modeling Language, V. 2.5.1, Object Management Group
,
2017
, see http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.