Investment in commodities has become an alternative investment that is increasingly in demand by the public in the last fifteen years. In commodity investment, there are two things that investors consider, namely return and risk. One way to calculate risk is to use Value at Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES). The main reason of this research is to determine the value of Value at Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) of selected agriculture commodities which are Wheat, Cocoa and Cotton using the time series model approach. The data used in this research is the daily closing price of selected commodities from January 3, 2017 to December 31, 2020. In the time series modeling process, the models used for predicting commodities price movements are Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) for the mean model, and Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (GARCH) for the volatility model. The values of mean and variance acquired from the model are then used to calculate the Value at Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) of each selected commodity. Based on the analysis, obtained that from the selected commodities, the estimated risk for selected commodities varies, where based on Value at Risk, Cotton has the lowest risk with a Value at Risk of 0.02189155, and Cocoa has the highest risk with a Value at Risk 0.02435271. However, Expected Shortfall gives a different conclusion, where Cocoa has the lowest risk with an Expected Shortfall value of 0.02435271 and Cotton has the highest risk with an Expected Shortfall value of 0.03114681.

1.
M.
Hwang
and
J.F.
Cheng
. “
Definition of “Investment”—A voice from the eye of the storm
”.
Asian Journal of International Law.
2010
.
2.
J.
Fattah
,
L.
Ezzine
,
Z.
Aman
,
H.
El Moussami
, and
A.
Lachhab
. “
Forecasting of demand using ARIMA model
”.
International Journal of Engineering Business Management.
2018
3.
A.
KumarMahto
,
R.
Biswas
, and
M.A.
Alam
. “
Short term forecasting of Agriculture commodity price by Using ARIMA: Based on Indian market
”.
Communications in Computer and Information Science
,
2019
4.
G.
Bandyopadhyay
. “
Gold price forecasting using arima model
”.
Journal of Advanced Management Science.
2016
.
5.
J.D.
Cryer
and
K.S.
Chan
.
Time series analysis: with applications in R
(Vol.
2
).
New York
:
Springer
.
2008
.
6.
U.
Azmi
and
W.H.
Syaifudin
. “
Peramalan Harga Komoditas dengan Menggunakan Metode ARIMA-GARCH
”.
Jurnal Varian
,
3
(
2
).
2020
.
7.
F.
Gao
and
F.
Song
. “
Estimation Risk in GARCH VaR and ES Estimates
”.
Econometric Theory
,
24
(
5
).
2008
.
8.
J.D.
Cryer
, J.D. and
K.S.
Chan
.
Time series analysis: with applications in R
(Vol.
2
).
New York
:
Springer
.
2008
9.
G.E.P.
Box
,
G.M.
Jenkins
, and
G.C.
Reinsel
.
Time series analysis: forecasting and control,
3rd edition.
Englewood Cliffs
:
Prentice Hall
.
1994
.
10.
R.
Adhikari
and
K.K.
Agrawal
.
An Introductory Study on Time Series Modeling and Forecasting.
Lambert Academy Publishing
.
2013
.
11.
Sukono
,
E.
Lesmana
,
D.
Susanti
,
H.
Napitupulu
, and
Y.
Hidayat
. “
Estimating the value-at-risk for some stocks at the capital market in Indonesia based on ARMA-FIGARCH models
”.
Journal of Physics Conference Series.
2017
.
12.
R.F.
Engle
. “
Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation
”.
Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society
,
1982
.
13.
T.
Bollerslev
. “
Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity
”.
Journal of econometrics
, vol.
31
(
3
).
1986
.
14.
S. J.
Taylor
.
Modelling financial time series
.
world scientific
.
2008
.
15.
T.
Sunaryo
,
Manajemen risiko finansial
.
Jakarta
:
Salemba Empat
.
2009
.
16.
P.
Artzner
,
Delbaen
,
J.M.
Eber
, and
D.
Heath
.
1999
.
Coherent Mesures of Risk
.
Mathematical Finance
, vol.
9
.
1999
.
17.
Y.
Yamai
and
T.
Yoshiba
. “
On The Validity of Value-at-Risk: Comparative Analysis with Expected Shortfall
”.
Monetary and Economic Studies
, vol
20
, pp.
57
86
.
2002
.
18.
Sukono
,
Wahyudin
,
N.
Nurhasanah
, and
J.
Saputra
. “
Modeling of Modified Value-At-Risk for the Skewed Student-T Distribution
”.
Opción Año
, vol.
35
, No.
89
, pp.
932
957
.
2019
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.