The COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on the world of education and it leads to the cancellation of all educational activities. An online learning system was an educational system or concept that utilizes information technology in the teaching and learning process. The basic principles in the online learning process are clarity of messages, learning strategies, interactivity, growth of motivation and creativity, and the use of media for effective communication. The purpose of this study was to determine what factors are hindering students in online lectures by using Principal Component Analysis. The research was conducted using a survey method, namely by filling in forms for undergraduate students at the University of Mataram. The method used to analyze the data was a quantitative descriptive technique which was expressed in the distribution of scores and percentages. This form contains 15 observed variables, after factor analysis was carried out, and obtained 3 factors that most hamper online lectures. The dominant factor is Factor 1 that can explain 28.957% of the variation. The variables included in Factor 1 are the lack of concentration, material understanding, not direct discussion, unconcern (boredom), and lack of study companion variables. The results obtained can be used as a consideration to maximize online lectures during the COVID-19 pandemic.

1.
D.
Nambiar
, “
The Impact of Online Learning During COVID-19: Students' and Teachers’ Perspective
”,
International Journal of Indian Psychology
,
8
(
2
),
783
793
(
2020
).
2.
C.
Coman
,
L. G.
Tiru
,
L. M.
Schmitz
,
C.
Stanciu
, and
M. C.
Bularca
, “
Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective
”,
Sustainability
,
12,
1
24
(
2020
).
3.
University of Mataram
, “Pedoman Sistem Pembelajaran Daring” (
UNRAM Press
,
Mataram
,
2020
)
4.
J. F.
Hair
,
C. B.
William
,
J. B.
Barry
, and
E. A.
Rolph
, “
Multivariate Data Analysis 7th Edition
” (
America
:
Pearson Prentice Hall
,
2010
).
5.
R.
Khattree
and
D. N.
Naik
, “
Multivariate Data Reduction and Discrimination With SAS Software”
(
John Wiley
,
New York
,
2000
)
6.
A. C.
Rencher
, “Methods of Multivariate Analysis Second Edition” (
John Wiley
,
New York
,
2002
).
7.
D.
Satria
and
M.
Mushthofa
, “
Perbandingan Metode Ekstraksi Ciri Histogram dan PCA Untuk Mendeteksi Stoma Pada Citra Penampang Daun Freycinetia
”,
Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Agri-Informatika
,
2
(
1
),
20
28
(
2013
).
8.
A. R.
Syakhala
,
D.
Puspitaningrum
,
E. V.
Purwandari
, “
Perbandingan Metode Principal Component Analysis (PCA) dengan Metode Hidden Markov Model (HMM) dalam Pengenalan Identitas Seseorang Melalui Wajah
”,
Jurnal Rekursif
,
3
(
2
),
68
81
(
2015
).
9.
W.
Astuti
and
Adiwijaya
, “
Principal Component Analysis Sebagai Ekstraksi Fitur Data Microarray Untuk Deteksi Kanker Berbasis Linear Discriminant Analysis
”,
Jurnal Media Informatika Budidarma
,
3
(
2
),
72
77
(
2019
).
10.
W.
Hardle
and
L.
Simar
, “
Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis
” (
Springer
,
New York
,
2003
).
11.
R. A.
Johnson
and
D. W.
Winchern
, “Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis” (
Pearson Education Inc
.,
USA
,
2007
).
12.
S.
Nugroho
, “
Statistika Multivariat Terapan
” (
UNIB Press
,
Bengkulu
,
2008
)
13.
E.
Verdian
, “
Analisis Faktor Yang Merupakan Intensi Perpindahan Merek Transportasi Online di Surabaya
”,
AGORA
,
7
(
1
),
1
8
(
2019
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.