The purpose of this study was to determine the profile of the metacognitive experience of mathematics education students in understanding the concept of Differential Calculus in terms of gender differences. This type of research is exploratory with a qualitative approach. The research subjects were students of mathematics education at Halu Oleo University who programmed the Differential Calculus course. The process of selecting research subjects is based on the results of the mathematics ability test of the students of the Department of Mathematics Education. From the test results, 4 students with high abilities were selected, consisting of 2 males (1 new student and 1 old student), and 2 females (1 new student and 1 old student). The main data collection of this study was obtained by using an interview technique (interview). Data analysis techniques consist of data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. The results of this study are for new students, male students' understanding of differential calculus concepts is better than female students. Meanwhile, for old students, the understanding of differential calculus concepts for female students is better than male students. The metacognitive experience of new students in understanding the concept of differential calculus is based on their experience while studying in high school, while the metacognitive experience of old students in understanding the concept of differential calculus is based on their experience during college.

1.
L. W.
Anderson
,
D.R.
Krathwohl
,
P.W.
Airasian
,
K. A.
Cruikshank
,
R. E.
Mayer
,
P. R.
Pintrich
, … &
M. C.
Wittrock
, “
A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives
”, abridged edition.
White Plains, NY: Longman
, (
2001
).
2.
L.
Arthur
, and
D.
Smith
, "
Defining higher order thinking
."
Theory into practice,
32
(
3
),
131
137
(
1993
)
3.
P.
Biryukov
. "
Metacognitive aspects of solving combinatorics problem Kaye College of Education
." Direct access: http://www.cimt.org.uk/journal-/biryukov. (
2003
).
4.
R.H.
Bruning
,
G.J.
Schraw
, &
R.R.
Ronning
.
Cognitive Psychology and Instruction,
Second Edition,
New Jersey
:
Prentice Hall
, (
1995
).
5.
J.
Dunlosky
, and
J.
Metcalfe
,
Metacognition
.
Sage Publications
, (
2008
).
6.
J.H.
Flavell
. "
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
."
American psychologist
,
34
(
10
),
906
(
1979
)
7.
J.H.
Flavell
. "
Perspectives on perspective taking
."
Piaget's theory: Prospects and possibilities
(
1992
), pp.
107
139
.
8.
M. R.
Gagne
. "
Some issues in the psychology of mathematics instruction
."
Journal for Research in mathematics education
14
(
1
),
7
18
(
1983
)
9.
J. D.
Hacker
.
Definitions and empirical foundations
.
Routledge
, (
1998
).
10.
A.
Livingston
,
Jennifer
. "
Metacognition: An Overview
." (
2003
).
11.
M.B.
Miles
,
A.M.
Huberman
, and
J.
Saldana
. "
Fundamentals of qualitative data analysis
."
Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook
3
, (
2014
).
12.
L.
Misu
,
I.K.
Budayasa
, and
A.
Lukito
. "
Profile of metacognition of mathematics pre-service teachers in understanding the concept of integral calculus with regard gender differences
."
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
947
(
1
). IOP Publishing, (
2018
).
13.
L.
Misu
,
I.K.
Budayasa
, and
A.
Lukito
. "
Profile of metacognition of mathematics and mathematics education students in understanding the concept of integral calculus
."
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
974
(
1
). IOP Publishing, (
2018
).
14.
L.
Misu
, and
L.
Masi
. "
Profile of metacognition of mathematics education students in understanding the concept of integral in category inferring with regard gender differences
."
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
1157
(
4
), IOP Publishing, (
2019
).
15.
L.
Misu
L,
I.K.
Budayasa
, and
A.
Lukito
. "
Profile of Metacognition of Mathematics Education Students in Understanding the Concept of Integral in Category Classifying and Summarizing
."
International Journal of Instruction
12
(
3
),
481
496
. (
2019
)
16.
T.O.
Nelson
. "
The meta-level versus object-level distinction (and other issues) in formulations of metacognition
.", pp.
179
. (
1997
)
17.
L.L.
Nietfeld
, and
G.
Schraw
. "
The effect of knowledge and strategy training on monitoring accuracy
."
The Journal of Educational Research
95
(
3
),
131
142
(
2002
)
18.
U.
Rahim
and
La
Misu
.
“The Resolution Integral Approach to Metacognition in Math Education Student of Halu Oleo University.
International Journal of Education and Research,
2
(
8
),
151
158
(
2015
)
19.
G.
Schraw
, and
Rayne S.
Dennison
. "
Assessing metacognitive awareness
."
Contemporary educational psychology
19
(
4
),
460
475
(
1994
)
20.
D.
Tall
, and
S.
Vinner
. "
Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity
."
Educational studies in mathematics
12
(
2
),
151
169
(
1981
)
21.
K.W.
Thiede
,
M.
Anderson
, and
D.
Therriault
. "
Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts
."
Journal of educational psychology
95
(
1
),
66
(
2003
)
22.
S.
Vinner
, and
R.
Hershkowitz
. "
Concept images and common cognitive paths in the development of some simple geometrical concepts
."
Proceedings of the fourth international conference for the psychology of mathematics education.
1
, (
1980
).
23.
S.
Yildirim
, &
N. E.
Zehra
, “
The Relationship between University Students’ Metacognitive Awereness and Solving Similar Type of Mathematical Problem
”.
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education
,
9
(
4
),
411
415
(
2013
)
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.