The long-term performance of asphalt pavements is influenced by the quality of the supporting subgrade, with subgrade required to prevent premature asphalt pavement failures. Quality control (QC) in the conventional subgrade compaction process has usually been limited to attempting to determine spot density and moisture content readings using a nuclear density gauge (NDG). Based on its ability to verify both the level and conformity of compaction, the use of a dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) would be an extremely valuable method for better construction inspection, while layer thickness could be determined by comparing the changing slope of the depth versus the profile of accumulated blows. DCP would offer low-cost field testing and save time as well as giving a more accurate continuous profile of the pavement layers. Manual driving would also no longer be necessary due to the DCP’s function, and as DCP could quickly locate weak spots, this would offer significant advantages over other in-situ pavement measurement systems. The main goal of this study was thus to create an alternative testing protocol using a dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) to compute the CBR achieved in the field as a means of evaluating the in-situ strength of unbound pavement layers. DCP data was used to determine the strength of compaction under the influence of different numbers of passes, while in the lab, a sand replacement test (SRM) was used to determine dry density. Two testing methods were then used in three subgrade soil locations: a dynamic test method that incorporated the DCP device to evaluate the strength of unbound pavement layers by computing the CBR achieved in the field, and a static test method with similar aims. The DCP data and SRM results from these locations were then examined to see if there was a link between DD values and DCP parameters. Based on DCP measurement techniques such as CBR and DCPI, statistical analyses were then performed to predict the CBR of subgrade soils. Nonlinear regression analyses for data from subgrade soils produced the most effective correlations with the coefficient of determination, being equal to 89.61. DCP measurements can thus be used to evaluate the strength of unbound pavement layers based on this research.

1.
Salour
F
,
Erlingsson
S
,
Road Materials and Pavement Design
16
,
553
68
(
2015
).
2.
Barman
M
,
Nazari
M
,
Imran
SA
,
Commuri
S
,
Zaman
M
,
Transportation Research Record
2579
,
59
69
(
2016
).
4.
Ping
WV
,
Sheng
B
,
Transportation research record
2232
,
95
107
(
2011
).
5.
Thach
Nguyen
B,
Mohajerani
A
,
International Journal of Pavement Engineering
18
,
473
84
(
2017
).
6.
Smith
RB
,
Pratt
DN
,
Australian Road Research
13
,
13285
293
(
1983
).
7.
George
V
,
Kumar
A
,
International Journal of Pavement Engineering
19
,
976
985
((
2018
)).
8.
Shaban
AM
,
Almuhanna
RR
,
Jawad
AA
,
Geotechnical Testing Journal-ASTM
44
,
1821
1838
((
2021
).
9.
Kleyn
EG
,
The use of the dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP)
, (
Pretoria, Transvaal
,
1975
).
10.
Livneh
M
,
Transportation Research Record
1219
,
56
67
,(
1989
).
11.
Harison
JA
,
Australian Road Research
19
,
313
317
(
1989
).
12.
Cosentino
PJ
,
Shaban
AM
,
Boggs
AM
. (
2018
),
Proceedings of the In Innovations in Geotechnical Engineering IFCEE 2018
(
ASCE
,
2018
),
Orlando
, pp.
68
86
.
13.
Shaban
AM
,
Cosentino
PJ
,
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
46
,
1942
1956
(
2018
).
14.
AASHTO M145-91
. “
Standard Specification for Classification of Soils and Soil Aggregate Mixtures for Highway Construction Purposes,
American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials
(
Washington, DC
.
2012
)
15.
ASTM D2487 – 11
. “
Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System),
American Society for Testing and Materials
(
West Conshohocken, PA
.
2005
).
16.
ASTM D1556
.
‘Standard Test Method for Density and Unit Weight of Soil in Place by Sand-Cone’
,
ASTM International
, (
West Conshohocken, PA
.
2015
).
17.
ASTM D1557–12
. “
Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort,
American Society for Testing and Materials
(
West Conshohocken, PA
.
2012
).
18.
ASTM D854 – 14
. “
Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer
”,
American Society for Testing and Materials
(
West
,
2014
)
19.
ASTM D1883–07
. “
Standard Test Method for CBR (California Bearing Ratio) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils,
American Society for Testing and Materials
(
West
,
2007
).
20
ASTM D 6951-03
.
’Test method for use of the dynamic cone penetrometer in shallow pavement applications’
,
ASTM International
(
West Conshohocken, PA
.
2009
)
21.
ASTM D2011
, “
Standard Test Method for Density and Unit Weight of Soil in Place by Sand-Cone,
American Society for Testing and Materials
(
West Conshohocken, PA
.
2011
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.