Crop livestock integrated farming system has been adopted widely across the county in Indonesia. One of the benefits of its implementation in the field is the provision of feeds for livestock particularly in the dry season. Maize is the potential crop for implementing integrated farming system due to the substitution of its leaves, cornstalks, and corncob as the raw materials for feeding livestock. This study was aimed to develop the model of maize and beef cattle integrated farming system. Bima 20 URI variety was introduced as the stay-green corn in the farm area of 10 ha which has involved 10 farmers as the cooperator farmers and 5 farmers as the control model. Managing maize waste for silage, beef cattle housing, and making organic fertilizer from cattle waste were employed by cooperating farmers. Study results showed that the average yield of BIMA 20 URI is 5.4 tons per ha with the net income of IDR9,945,000 per ha per season. However, non-cooperating farmers produced shelled corn of 3.5 tons per ha per season with the net income of IDR5,210,000 per ha per season. Moreover, raising five beef cattle as the non-model implementation reached the net income of IDR12,830,000 per year, while the net income of cooperating farmers as the integrated model of raising beef cattle is IDR23,625,000 per year and value added from making organic fertilizer is IDR9,330,000. Therefore, the total net income of cooperator farmers by implementing the model of maize and beef cattle integrated farming system is IDR32,955,000 per year. The model provides higher income than the control model so it is highly recommended to be implemented.

1.
G.
Ismail
and
A.
Djajanegara
,
Basic Framework for Developing Integrated Livestock Farming System
(
PAATP Project
,
Jakarta
,
2004
).
2.
Suswono
,
Strategi Induk Pembangunan Pertanian
2013
2045
(
Jakarta
,
2013
).
3.
M. A.
Ansari
et al., “
Integrated Farming System: An ideal approach for developing more economically and environmentally sustainable farming systems for the Eastern Himalayan Region
,”
Indian J. Agric. Sci.
84
,
356
362
(
2014
).
4.
H.
Saediman
, “
Prioritizing Commodities in Southeast Sulawesi Province of Indonesia Using AHP based Borda Count Method
,”
Asian Soc. Sci.
11
,
171
179
(
2015
).
5.
Center of Statistical
Bureau
,
Southeast Sulawesi in Figures 2017
(
Center of Statistical Bureau Sulawesi Tenggara
,
Kendari
,
2017
).
6.
H.
Saediman
,
S.
Tanggapili
,
Bahari
,
L.
Yunus
,
S.
Abdullah
, and
S. A. A.
Taridala
, “
Management Characteristics of Small-Scale Beef Cattle Production in Konawe District of Southeast Sulawesi
,”
Biosci. Res.
16
,
3854
3860
(
2019
).
7.
Gunawan
,
M. A.
Yusron
,
Aryogi
, and
A.
Rasyid
, “
Peningkatan Produktivitas Pedet Jantan Sapi Perah Rakyat Melalui Penambahan Pakan Konsentrat
,”
96
(
1996
).
8.
U.
Kusnadi
et al.,
Hasil Penelitian Usahatani Ternak Terpadu di Dataran Tinggi Jawa Tengah
(
Bogor
,
1993
).
9.
I.
Saka
,
Pemberian Pakan dan Pemeliharaan Ternak Kerja
(
Denpasar
,
1990
).
10.
S.
Guntoro
,
A. A. N. B. S.
Dinata
, and
I. W.
Sudarma
, “
Pemanfaatan Feses Sapi untuk Bahan Ransum Ayam Buras
,”
J. Pengkaj. dan Pengemb. Teknol. Pertan.
18
,
217
224
(
2015
).
11.
I. M. R.
Yasa
et al.,
Laporan Akhir Kajian Identifikasi Kebutuhan Teknologi Pertanian Spesifik Lokasi di Provinsi Bali
(
2013
).
12.
Center of Statistical Bureau
,
Southeast Sulawesi in figures 2016
(
Center of Statistical Bureau Sulawesi Tenggara
,
Kendari
,
2016
).
13.
H.
Saediman
,
M. A.
Limi
,
Rosmawaty
,
P.
Arimbawa
, and
Y.
Indarsyih
, “
Cassava consumption and food security status among cassava growing households in southeast sulawesi
,”
Pakistan J. Nutr.
15
,
1008
1016
(
2016
).
14.
Subandi
and
Zubachtirodin
, “
Prospek Pertanaman Jagung dalam Produksi Biomas Hijauan
,” in
Prosiding Seminar Nasional: Pemberdayaan Petani Miskin di Lahan Marginal Melalui Inovasi Teknologi Tepat Guna
,
04
(
2004
).
15.
Y.
Hayami
,
T.
Kawagoe
,
Y.
Morooka
, and
M.
Siregar
,
Agricultural Marketing and Processing in Upland Java A Perspective From A Sunda Village
(
Bogor
,
1986
).
16.
W. D.
Downey
and
S. P.
Erickson
,
Agribusiness Management
(
Erlangga
,
Jakarta
,
2004
).
17.
Kadariah
,
Evaluasi proyek: analisa ekonomis
(
Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia
,
Jakarta
,
1986
).
18.
H.
Saediman
,
Mustika
,
L.
Nalefo
,
M.
Tufaila
, and
M.
Zani
, “
Cost and Return Analysis of Rice Farming and Brick Making in South Konawe District of Southeast Sulawesi
,”
Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res.
8
,
835
838
(
2019
).
19.
H.
Saediman
,
S.
Kurniansi
,
W. O.
Yusria
, and
L.
Geo
, “
Economic Returns And Production Constraints In Palm Sugar Processing In Kolaka District Of Southeast Sulawesi
,”
Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res.
8
,
3967
3970
(
2019
).
20.
Soekartawi
,
Analisis Usahatani
(
UI-Press
,
Jakarta
,
2002
).
21.
H.
Saediman
,
A.
Amini
,
R.
Basiru
, and
L. O.
Nafiu
, “
Profitability and Value Addition in Cassava Processing in Buton District of Southeast Sulawesi Province, Indonesia
,”
J. Sustain. Dev.
8
,
226
234
(
2015
).
22.
S.
Huda
and
W.
Wikanta
, “
Pemanfaatan Limbah Kotoran Sapi Menjadi Pupuk Organik Sebagai Upaya Mendukung Usaha Peternakan Sapi Potong di Kelompok Tani Ternak Mandiri Jaya Desa Moropelang Kec. Babat Kab. Lamongan
,”
Aksiologiya
1
,
26
35
(
2017
).
23.
Munandar
,
F.
Gustiar
,
Yakup
,
R.
Hayati
, and
A. I.
Munawar
, “
Crop-cattle integrated farming system: An alternative of climatic change mitigation
,”
Media Peternak.
38
,
95
103
(
2015
).
24.
S. D. W.
Prajanti
and
I.
Susilowati
, “
The prospect of integrated farming system of crops-fish-husbandary as the survival strategy to secure the farmers’ economy: Case study in Magelang-Indonesia
,”
Int. J. Econ. Financ. Issues
6
,
84
87
(
2016
).
This content is only available via PDF.
Published by AIP Publishing.
You do not currently have access to this content.