The issue of rationalization of the learning process, taking into account academic mobility and formed, meeting the needs of production, practical skills of graduates, is becoming more and more relevant. Cognitive-pragmatic technologies within the framework of practice-oriented training allow optimizing the educational process without losing the quality of training of engineering specialists. With the advent and introduction of cognitive-pragmatic technologies in the educational process, the student has become an active subject of the educational process. The teacher-student relationship has reached a qualitatively different level, where the teacher is required to have managerial competence rather than didactic competence. Cognitive technologies simultaneously with the analysis of the current situation search for knowledge, skills and abilities acquired and formed by students in the process of theoretical and practical training. As a result of the introduction of these technologies in the training of engineering personnel, we get a qualitatively different specialist, excellent performance and efficiency in the performance of tasks. The article substantiates the principles of the implementation of cognitive technologies in the training of mining engineers in the specialty "Mining" of the orientation "Technological safety and mountain rescue".

1.
Siegfried
Rouvraisa
,
Bernard
Remaudb
and
Morgan
Saveusec
,
European journal of engineering education
45
(
1
), pp.
89
102
(
2020
).
2.
S. F.
Sergeev
,
M. E.
Bershadsky
and
O. M.
Chorosova
,
Cognitive pedagogics: technologies of e-learning in the professional development of a teacher
(
IGIiPMNS SB RAS
,
Yakutsk
,
2016
).
3.
O. V.
Potanina
,
Bulletin of the Bashkir University
.
Section “Pedagogics and Psychology”
14
(
1
), pp.
298
301
(
2009
).
4.
Fredrik
Asplund
,
Elias
Flening
.
European journal of engineering education
(
2021
).
5.
I. M.
Vorob’eva
,
Young scientist
,
11
(
91
), pp.
1304
1307
(
2015
).
6.
Yu. A.
Dubrovskaya
,
L. V.
Pikhkonen
and
G. V.
Rudenko
,
Scientific and theoretical Journal “Scientific notes of the University named after
P. F.
Lesgaft
8
(
186
), pp.
105
113
(
2020
).
7.
Yu.
Dubrovskaya
,
A. Science and education
2
, pp.
254
256
(
2019
).
8.
J.
Andersen
Cognitive psychology
.
St. Petersburg
:
Piter
(
2002
).
9.
Gerard
Poitras
,
Eric
Poitras
,
Engineering education
6
(
1
) (
2011
).
10.
P.
Davis
,
A.
Vinson
and
R.
Stevens
,
Informal Mentorship of New Engineers in the Workplace
(
Columbus
,
Ohio
,
2017
).
11.
Mica R.
Endsley
,
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
,
9
(
1
), pp.
4
32
(
2015
).
12.
M. B.
Flek
and
E. A.
Ugnich
,
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
,
155,
pp.
1659
1669
(
2021
).
13.
H. M.
Cuevas
,
R. E.
Jones
and
M. E.
Mossey
,
Team and shared situation awareness in disaster action teams
(
Santa Monica
,
CA
,
2011
).
14.
R. S.
Gutzwiller
and
B. A.
Clegg
,
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
7
(
2
), pp.
141
154
(
2012
).
15.
K.
Sulistayawati
,
C. D.
Wickens
and
Y. P.
Chui
,
International Journal of Aviation Psychology
21
(
2
), pp.
153
174
(
2011
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.