The study aims to analyze the chemical representation ability of high school students on molecule shapes topic. The one-shot case study design was conducted. This design is one of single-group design in experimental research design. The posttest was given after did the treatment in learning process. Test of analytical thinking based on multiple representations (TAT-MR) that captures of four levels in chemical representation (macroscopic, microscopic, symbolic and mathematics) was used to assess the students’ ability. There were 13 items test that had good reliability. The TAT-MR was administered to 50 high school students drawn from senior high school in Pekanbaru, Indonesia. The result showed that students had a good ability on chemical representation skills with a percentage of 21.5 %. However, the students still had difficulty to show the microscopic representation and representation mathematic. Hence, the ability of high school students in chemical representation needs to be improved. This study suggests that multiple representations approach should be used in chemistry learning at high school.

1.
A.
Majid
,
M.
Amir
and
B. K.
Prahani
,
IOSR J. Res. Method Educ
8
,
47
54
(
2018
).
2.
H.
Awang
and
I
Ramly
,
Int. J. Human. Soc. Sci
3
,
334
229
(
2008
).
3.
M.
Barak
and
R.
Hussein-farraj
,
J. Chem. Educ
20
,
14
19
(
2009
).
4.
A.
Hilton
and
K.
Nichols
,
Int. J. Sci. Educ
33
,
2215
2246
(
2011
).
5.
G.
Sirhan
,
J. Turkish Sci. Educ
4
,
2
20
(
2007
).
6.
S.
Akaygun
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract
17
,
788
807
(
2016
).
7.
Kelly
,
R. M.
and
J. R.
Hansen
,
Educ. Quim
40
,
476
481
(
2017
).
8.
N.
Zarkadis
,
G.
Papageorgiou
and
D.
Stamovlasis
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract
18
,
893
902
(
2017
).
9.
S. P.
Madden
,
L. L.
Jones
and
J.
Rahm
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
12
,
283
293
(
2011
).
10.
R.
Sagita
,
F.
Azra
and
M.
Azhar
, "
Development of mole concept module based on structured inquiry with interconection of macro, submicro, and symbolic representation for grade x of senior high school
," in
the 2nd International Conference on Mathematics, Science, Education and Technology
,
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
335
, edited by
Ramli
et al
(
IOP Publishing
,
Bristol, England
,
2018
) pp.
1
9
.
11.
J. M. P.
Sanchez
,
Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res.
20
,
48
63
(
2021
).
12.
C.
Dahsah
and
R. K.
Coll
,
Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ.
6
,
573
600
(
2008
).
13.
J. K.
Gilbert
and
D. F.
Treagust
,
Chemical Education
4
,
1
8
(
2009
).
14.
H.
Taha
,
R.
Hashim
,
Z.
Ismail
,
K.
Jusoff
and
Y. Y.
Khoo
,
Scottish J. Arts, Soc. Sci. Sci. Stud
21
,
3
21
(
2014
).
15.
D.
Milenkovic
,
M.
Segedinac
,
T.
Hrin
and
S.
Cvjeticanin
,
Croat. J. Educ
16
,
699
722
(
2014
).
16.
A. L.
Chandrasegaran
,
D. F.
Treagust
and
M.
Mocerino
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
8
,
293
307
(
2007
).
18.
I.
Devetak
,
E. D. Lorber
Drofenik
,
M.
Jurisevic
and
S. A.
Glazar
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
10
,
281
290
(
2009
).
19.
B.
Davidowitz
,
G.
Chittleborough
and
E.
Murray
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
11
,
154
164
(
2010
).
20.
A. H.
Johnstone
,
Chem. Educ.
4
,
34
38
(
2000
).
21.
Sunyono
,
J. New Horizons Educ.
5
,
30
45
(
2015
).
22.
N. L.
Dean
,
C.
Ewan
and
J. S.
McIndoe
,
J. Chem. Educ.
93
,
1660
1662
(
2016
).
23.
L. L.
Jones
,
K. D.
Jordan
and
N. A.
Stillings
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
6
,
136
149
(
2005
).
24.
T. L.
Nahum
,
R.
Mamlok-Naaman
,
A.
Hofstein
and
J.
Krajcik
,
Sci. Educ.
91
579
603
(
2007
).
25.
D. L.
Fay
,
S.
Akhavan
and
V. M.
Goldberg
,
Chemie Int. Ed.
6
,
106
111
(
1967
).
26.
K. R.
Jessen
and
R.
Mirsky
,
Glia.
56
,
1552
1565
(
2008
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.