Indonesia has implemented 2013 Curriculum for eight years since its validity period. This study aims to describe the results of the evaluation of learning success by implementing the 2013 Curriculum, synthesize from relevant research results using CIPP/CIPPO, LOGIC and Discrepancy Provus’s evaluation model and then, the result of synthesize can categorized in high, moderate dan low in term evaluation model used in the research. From the results of the categorized analysis, the researchers may conclude and decide whether the 2013 curriculum can continue, revised or discontinue. The writing method used is a systematic literature review by summarizing the results of related evaluation research, then interpreting and identifying the success of the learning. The researcher synthesized ten articles based on the following criteria: (1) research articles containing empirical evidence related to the evaluation of learning success by implementing the 2013 Curriculum, (2) articles from journals published in the 2017-2020 period. Results of the study and discussion shows that (a). Evaluation of the implementation of the 2013 Curriculum with the CIPP/CIPPO model shows that the implementation of the 2013 Curriculum in general can be categorized as “high”; (b). Evaluation of the implementation of the 2013 Curriculum with the LOGIC model shows that the implementation of the 2013 Curriculum in general can be categorized as “low”; (c). Evaluation of the implementation of the 2013 Curriculum with the Discrepancy Provus’s model shows that the implementation of the 2013 Curriculum in general can be categorized as “moderate”. Based on results and discussions it may be concluded that the success of learning with the 2013 curriculum can continue to be performed but is still required for improvement or revision.

1.
A.
Wibowo
,
J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat.
4
,
1
10
(
2017
)
2.
D.A.
Astuti
,
S.
Haryanto
, and
Y.
Prihatni
,
Wiyata
Dharma
J. Educ. Res. Eval.
6
,
7
14
(
2018
).
3.
R.
Revita
, and
I.
Fitri
,
J. Cendekia J. Math. Educ.
3
,
197
208
(
2019
).
4.
Sukajaya
and
I.
Nyoman
,
J. Educ. Teach.
43
,
1
72
(
2010
).
5.
H.
Retnawati
,
Cakrawala Pendidik.
3
,
390
403
(
2015
).
6.
R.
Heri
and
M.
Endang
,
Evaluation Education Program
(
Universitas Terbuka
,
Tangerang Selatan
,
2014
), pp.
132
133
.
7.
Kartowagiran
,
Badrun
,
R.
Heri
,
Sutopo
, and
M.
Faridl
. 2017, “
Evaluation of the Implementation of Curriculum 2013 Vocational
” in
International Conference on Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI)
, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, edited by M.
Hajaroh
et al
(
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
,
Yogyakarta
,
2018
), pp.
814
819
.
8.
Febrison
,
F.
Rizal
, and
Wakhinuddin
,
J. Vocat. Technol. Educ.
1
,
75
82
(
2018
).
9.
Trisnawati
,
l.
Anggraeni
, and
A. B.
Wicaksono
, “Evaluation of 2013 Curriculum Implementation at the Senior High School Level in Pringsewu District Using the CIPP Model,”
in Proceedings of Biology Education
, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
3
, edited by
R. H.
Ristanto
(
Universitas Negeri Jakarta
,
Jakarta
,
2019
), pp.
74
83
.
10.
Mexdadoris
, and
J.
Jama
,
J. Educ. Res. Eval.
4
,
315
321
(
2020
).
11.
U. N.
Hasanah
,
J. Educ. Manag. Account.
5
,
95
108
(
2017
).
12.
L. L.
Uran
,
J. Educ. Res. Eval.
22
,
1
11
(
2018
).
13.
I.
Fitri
and
R.
Revita
J. Cendekia J. Math. Educ.
3
,
437
446
(
2019
).
14.
Y.
Makaborang
,
J. Educ. Manag.
6
,
130
145
(
2019
)
15.
Y.
Mulyono
,
Sardimi
,
Ayatusa’adah
and
N.
Lestariningsih
,
Transform. J. Islamic Stud.
1
,
247
258
(
2017
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.