MCA as a PISA-inspired test is seen as a more holistic assessment to improve the quality of Indonesian education. MCA is mired in controversy as it is planned to replace the 2021 National Examination. Although some research explores MCA, no studies have precisely surveyed secondary teachers’ perceptions of it. This study aimed to reveal the teachers’ perceptions and teaching strategies to prepare their students in MCA through an explanatory sequential design. 72 EFL secondary teachers working at private and public junior and senior high schools in Indonesia participated in this study. The data was gathered in two phases; a survey through distributing a questionnaire and an unstructured interview. The quantitative data were analyzed using statistical analysis (SPSS), while the qualitative data were analyzed using thematic data analysis. This study revealed that teachers were optimistic about implementing MCA, with most teachers supporting that MCA is an accurate indicator to enhance school’s quality and improve teaching and learning and be valid and reliable. As a recommendation, future research could involve a higher number of participants and needs to be directed to explore deeply to find the relationship between teachers’ teaching methods and students’ results in MCA.

1.
OECD
. (
2020
). PISA 2018 Results (Volume VI): Are Students Ready to Thrive in an Interconnected World?
PISA
;
PISA, OECD Publishing Paris
. .
2.
Y.
Harususilo
, (
2019
, December 4).
Skor PISA Terbaru Indonesia, Ini 5 PR Besar Pendidikan ada Era Nadiem Makarim
”.
Kompas. Com
,
4
.
3.
R.
Ismail
,
Mudjiran
,
Neviyarni
, &
H.
Nirwana
, (
2020
).
Creative approach guidance and counseling facing independence learning policy: Minimum competency assessment and survey characters in the industrial revolution 4.0
.
E-Tech: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Pendidikan
,
8
(
1
),
1
10
.
4.
Pusmenjar
. (
2020
).
AKM dan implikasinya pada pembelajaran
.
Balitbangbuk
,
Kemendikbud
.
5.
cnnindonesia.com
. (
2019
, December).
Mendikbud Nadiem: UN Buat Siswa, Guru, dan Orang tua Stres
. Www.Cnnindonesia.Com. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20191212173854-20-456443/mendikbud-nadiem-un-buat-siswa-guru-dan-orang-tua-stres
6.
Kemendikbud
. (
2020
).
Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum
. https://hasilun.puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/akm/frontpage/detail
7.
R. W.
Tyler
, (
1966
).
A Program of National Assessment
.
Educational Forum
,
30
(
4
),
391
396
.
8.
A. W.
Argina
,
D.
Mitra
,
N.
Ijabah
, &
R.
Setiawan
, (
2017
).
Indonesia PISA result : What factors and what should be fixed?
The 1st Educational and Language International Conference Proceedings Center for International Developmentof Unissula
,
69
79
. http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ELIC
9.
H. H.
Basri
, &
M.
Murtaddlo
, (
2019
). Indeks karakter siswa: Jenjang pendidikan menengah (
Cetakan Pe
).
Puslitbang Pendidikan Agama & Keagamaan
.
10.
N. S.
Perdana
, (
2021
).
Analysis of student readiness in facing Minimum Competency
.
Mukadimah
,
5
(
1
),
15
20
.
11.
D. A.
Rokhim
,
B. N.
Rahayu
,
L. N.
Alfiah
,
R.
Peni
,
B.
Wahyudi
,
A.
Wahyudi
,
H. R.
Widarti
, &
U. N.
Malang
. (
2021
).
Analisis Kesiapan Peserta Didik Dan Guru Pada Asesmen Nasional (Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum, Survey Karakter, Dan Survey Lingkungan Belajar
).
Jurnal Administrasi Dan Manajemen Pendidikan
,
4
(
1
),
61
71
.
12.
Aunurrahman
. (
2020
).
Taxonomy of educational problems in support of readiness for the implementation of Minimum Competency Assessment and character survey in elementary schools
.
Journal of Education, Teaching, and Learning
,
5
(
2
),
296
302
.
13.
N.
Novita
,
M.
Mellyzar
, &
H.
Herizal
, (
2021
).
Asesmen Nasional (AN): Pengetahuan dan Persepsi Calon Guru
.
JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan)
,
5
(
1
),
72
79
. http://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JISIP/index
14.
M.
Zahrudin
,
S.
Ismail
, &
Q. Y.
Zakiah
, (
2021
).
Policy Analysis of Implementation of Minimum Competency Assessment As an Effort To Improve Reading
.
Paedagoria: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kependidikan
,
12
(
1
),
83
91
. https://doi.org/Prefix DOI: 10.31764
15.
W. P.
Moellenberg
, (
1969
).
National assessment : Are we ready ?
The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas
,
43
(
8
),
451
454
.
16.
D. F.
Gullo
, (
2005
). Understanding assessment and evaluation in early childhood education. In
Understanding Assessment and Evaluation in Early Childhood Education
(2nd ed.).
Teachers College Press
.
17.
H.
Sahidu
,
M. P.
Gunawan
,
N. M. Y.
Suranti
, &
N.
Nisrina
, (
2020
). Model e-assessment dan implikasinya dalam pembelajaran (
L.
Herayanti
&
Imran
(eds.); 1st editio).
Literasi Nusantara
.
18.
D.
Leutner
,
J.
Fleischer
,
J.
Grünkorn
, &
E.
Klieme
, (
2017
). Competence assessment in education: An introduction.
Springer
,
Cham
,
1
6
.
19.
H. A.
Lora
,
U.
Rosidin
, &
I. W.
Distrik
, (
2020
).
The analysis of implementation of assessment for learning and assessment
.
International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2019)
,
422
,
179
182
.
20.
C.
Walley
, (
1995
).
Special publications: National assessment on literacy
.
Childhood Education
,
71
(
4
),
249
250
.
21.
R. R. P.
Patria
, (
2019
).
Indonesia reading literacy progress: an insight from PISA study
.
2nd International Conference on Educational Assessment and Policy (ICEAP 2019) INDONESIA
,
195
211
.
22.
M.
Stears
, &
N.
Gopal
, (
2010
).
Exploring alternative assessment strategies in science classrooms
.
South African Journal of Education
,
30
(
4
),
591
604
.
23.
OECD
. (
2016
). How does PISA for development measure reading literacy?
PISA
.
24.
V. S.
Damaianti
,
Y.
Abidin
, &
R.
Rahma
, (
2020
).
Higher order thinking skills-based reading literacy assessment instrument: An Indonesian context
.
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
,
10
(
2
),
513
525
.
25.
K. K.
Frankel
,
B. L. C.
Becker
,
M. W.
Rowe
, &
P. D.
Pearson
, (
2016
).
From “What is Reading?” to What is Literacy?
Journal of Education
,
196
(
3
),
7
17
.
26.
C.
Snow
. (
2002
). Reading for Understanding toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. In
RAND Education
.
Science & Technology Policy Institute
.
27.
J. W.
Creswell
, (
2014
). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th editio).
SAGE Publication, Inc
.
28.
F. A.
Hamied
. (
2017
). Research Methods: A Guide For First-Time Researchers (
D.
Sukyadi
(ed.)).
UPI Press
.
29.
H. D.
Brown
. (
2006
).
Principles of Language Learning and Teaching
.
Pearson Longman
.
30.
D. G.
Bonett
, &
T. A.
Wright
, (
2014
).
Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning
.
Journal of Organizational Behavior
,
36
(
1
),
3
15
.
31.
J.
Rahman
, (
2019
).
Dampak psikologi, fisik, dan persepsual siswa dalam menghadapi ujian nasional berbasis komputer
.
Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan.
32.
L. F. N.
Solehah
, (
2012
).
Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kecemasan Siswa Dalam Menghadapi Ujian Nasional
.
Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan
,
25
(
XVI
),
16
32
.
33.
J. W.
Miller
, &
M. C.
McKenna
, (
2016
).
World literacy: How countries rank and why it matters
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.