The Batutegi Forest Management Unit (FMU) has implemented Social Forestry programs, one of which is the Community Forest (HKm) scheme. The high social capital owned by forest farmer groups will facilitate the implementation of the HKM program in the field and can be a problem-solving solution. The variables of social capital, namely mutual trust, cooperation, and tolerance, will be able to build networks both within community groups and with other community groups. There have been many types of research on the correlation between community characteristics and community perception of community forest management (HKm), but fewer studies related the social characteristics HKm’s members to their social capital. Under these conditions, the research which has the objective to analyze the correlations of social characteristics and the elements forming the social capital of forest farmers managing HKm is needed. Data was collected in December 2018 and using interviews by open-ended and semi-structured questionnaires. Respondents amounted 86 persons are member of Sinar Harapan and Mahardika HKm Forest farmers group (HKm Gapoktan). Non-parametric test using Spearman Rank is a data analysis method in this study. The results showed that social characteristics of Gapoktan HKm Mahardika members are correlated with elements of social capital i.e. income and length of stay correlated to trust, age correlated to network and income correlated to norms. Meanwhile, Gapoktan HKm Sinar Harapan members only have one element of social capital that correlated to social characteristics, namely trust which correlated to age, education, income, and length of stay.

1.
H.
Kaskoyo
,
A. J.
Mohammed
, and
M.
Inoue
, “
Impact of community forest program in protection forest on livelihood outcomes: A case study of Lampung Province, Indonesia
,”
J. Sustain. For.
, vol.
36
, no. ue
3
, pp.
250
263
,
2017
.
2.
N. T.
Puspita
,
R.
Qurniati
, and
I. G.
Febryano
, “
Modal Sosial Masyarakat Pengelola Hutan Kemasyarakatan di Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Batu Tegi
,”
J. Sylva Lestari
, vol.
8
, no.
1
, pp.
54
64
,
2020
.
3.
E.
Puspitaningrum
and
D. P.
Lubis
, “
Social Capital and Community Participation of Tamansari Tourism Development in Banyuwangi District
,”
J. Sains Komun. Pengemb. Masy. [JSKPM)
, vol.
2
, no.
4
, pp.
465
484
,
2018
.
4.
R.
Safe’i
,
I. G.
Febryano
, and
L. N.
Aminah
, “
Pengaruh Keberadaan Gapoktan terhadap Pendapatan Petani and Perubahan Tutupan Lahan di Hutan Kemasyarakatan
,”
J. Ilmu-Ilmu Sos. Hum.
, vol.
20
, no.
2
, pp.
109
114
,
2018
.
5.
C.
Wulandari
, “
Identifying Climate Change Adaptation Efforts in the Batutegi Forest Management Unit, Indonesia
,”
For. Soc.
, vol.
5
, no.
1
, pp.
48
59
,
2021
.
6.
C.
Wulandari
, “
Importance of Community Social Capital On Ecoturism Development In Protection Forest
,”
J. Hutan Trop.
, vol.
7
, no. ue
3
, pp.
1
7
,
2019
.
7.
D. R.
Nurrochmat
,
D.
Darusman
, and
M.
Ekayani
, Kebijakan Pembangunan Kehutanan and Lingkungan.
Bogor
:
IPB Press
,
2016
.
8.
T.
Pranadji
, “
Penguatan Modal Sosial Untuk Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pedesaan Dalam Pengelolaan Agroekosistem Lahan Kering Studi Kasus di Desa-Desa (Hulu DAS) Ex Proyek Bangun Desa, Kabupaten Gunungkidul and Ex Proyek Pertanian Lahan Kering, Kabupaten Boyolali
,”
J. Agro Ekon. Indones. Agency Agric. Res. Dev.
, vol.
24
, no.
2
, pp.
5
12
,
2016
.
9.
C.
Wulandari
and
P.
Budiono
, “
Social capital status on HKm development in Lampung
,” in
international conference of Indonesia forestry researchers III 3rd INAFOR 2015
,
2016
, pp.
19
26
.
10.
R.
Putnam
, “
The prosperous community: Social capital and public life
,”
Am. Prospect
, vol.
13
, pp.
35
42
,
1993
.
11.
P.
Susantini
, “
Memperkuat modal sosial dalam pengelolaan hutan
,”
DwijenAGRO
, vol.
2
, no.
1
, pp.
1
8
,
2012
.
12.
E.
Puspasari
,
C.
Wulandari
,
A.
Darmawan
, and
I. S.
Banuwa
, “
Aspek Sosial Ekonomi pada Sistem Agroforestri di Areal Kerja Hutan Kemasyarakatan (HKm) Kabupaten Lampung Barat, Provinsi Lampung
,”
J. Sylva Lestari
, vol.
5
, no.
3
, pp.
95
103
,
2017
.
13.
I.
Fadlurrahman
and
Saharuddin
, “
The Relationship of Social Capital with Farmer Groups Participation in Koperasi Pondok Pesantren (Kopontren) (Case: Kopontren Alif, Alam Endah Village, Rancabali Sub District, Bandung District, West Java Province
,”
J. Sains Komun. Pengemb. Masy. [JSKPM
, vol.
2
, no.
3
, pp.
347
362
,
2018
.
14.
D. P.
Jayanegara
,
R. F.
Marta
, and
M.
Isnaini
, “
Hubungan Komunikasi Partisipatif and Modal Sosial terhadap Keberlanjutan Ekologi Ekowisata Mangrove Desa Teluk Naga
,” vol.
24
, no.
3
. pp.
545
557
,
2021
.
15.
R.
Qurniati
,
I. G.
Febryano
, and
D.
Zulfiani
, “
How trust influence social capital to support collective action in agroforestry development?
,”
BIODIVERSITAS
, vol.
18
, no.
3
, pp.
1201
1206
,
2017
.
16.
K.
Barki
,
S.
Satmoko
, and
B. T.
Eddy
, “
Pengaruh Modal Sosial terhadap Tingkat Adopsi Inovasi Padi Organik pada Anggota Kelompok Tani Paguyuban Al-Barokah
,”
Agromedia
, vol.
35
, no.
2
, pp.
1
9
,
2017
.
17.
P.
Idayanti
,
S. Bakri, C. Wulandari, and S. B. Yuwono
, “
Karakteristik Sosial Ekonomi yang Berpengaruh terhadap Pendapatan Kelompok Hutan Kemasyarakatan Panca Tunggal
,” in
Seminar Nasional Biologi 4: “Pemanfaatan Biodiversitas dan Bioteknologi untuk Pelestarian Lingkungan”Bandung 25 April 2019
,
2019
, pp.
1
14
.
18.
WageIndicator
, “
UMP/UMK Lampung
,”
Gajimu.com/Garmen
,
2021
.
19.
C.
Wulandari
and
M.
Inoue
, “
The Importance of Social Learning for the Development of Community Based Forest Management in Indonesia: The Case of Community Forestry in Lampung Province
,”
Small-scale For.
, vol.
17
, no.
3
, pp.
361
376
,
2018
.
20.
C.
Grootaert
and al, Integrated questionnaire for the measurement of social capital, The World Bank Social Capital Thematic Group.
The World Bank Social Capital Thematic Group
,
2003
.
21.
F.
Fukuyama
, Guncangan Besar Kodrat Manusia dan Tata Sosial Baru.
Jakarta
:
PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
,
2005
.
22.
P.
Szkudlarek
and
J. V.
Biglieri
, “
Trust as an Element of Social Capital – Evidence from a Survey of Polish and Spanish Students
,”
J. Int. Stud.
, vol.
9
, no.
1
, pp.
252
64
,
2016
.
23.
U.
Wuryanti
,
N.
Martono
, and
Mintarti
, “
Hubungan Status Sosial Ekonomi Dengan Modal Sosial Siswa Sma Di Purwokerto
,”
SOSIOGLOBAL
, vol.
5
, no.
1
, pp.
21
42
,
2021
.
24.
M.
Harahap
and
S.
Herman
, “
Hubungan Modal Sosial dengan Produktivitas Petani Sayur (Studi Kasus pada Kelompok Tani Barokah Kelurahan Tanah Enam Ratus Kecamatan Meand Marelan
,”
J. Agrium
, vol.
2
, no.
21
, pp.
157
165
,
2018
.
25.
T.
Hidayani
and
E.
Haryono
, “
Karakteristik Keadaan Sosial Ekonomi Petani Kopi di Kabupaten Lampung Barat
,”
J. Penelit. Geogr.
, vol.
1
, no.
6
, pp.
1
13
,
2018
.
26.
M. A.,
M. M. J.
Kapa
, and
K.
Herewila
, “
Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Produksi Kopi Arabika Bajawa (Studi Kasus Di Desa Beiwali, Kecamatan Bajawa Kabupaten Ngada
,”
Bul. Ilm. IMPAS
, vol.
2
, no.
20
, pp.
1
9
,
2019
.
27.
Y. T.
Agustin
,
W.
Sumekar
, and
T.
Dalmiyatun
, “
Factors Related to the Competence of Coffee Farmers in Keseneng Tourism Village Sumowono Sub District Semarang Regency Central Java
,”
Agroland
, vol.
27
, no. ue
2
, pp.
130
143
,
2020
.
28.
T. N.
Wicaksono
, “Hubungan Modal Sosial san Partisipasi Kepengurusan dengan Taraf Hidup Anggota Program Pengembangan Uasaha Agribisnis Pedesaan,”
Departemen Sains Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Masyarakat
,
Bogor
,
2016
.
29.
D. R.
Putnam
, “
Turning In, Turning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Sosial Capital in America
,”
Polit. Sci. Polit.
, vol.
28
,
1995
.
30.
R.
Lawang
, Capital Sosial: Dalam Perspektif Sosiologis Suatu Pengantar.
Jakarta
:
Fisip UI Press
,
2004
.
31.
P. T. O.
Viani
,
H.
Kaskoyo
,
C.
Wulandari
, and
R.
Safei
, “
Korelasi Antara Karakteristik Masyarakat dengan Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Pengelolaan Hutan Kemasyarakatan (HKm
,” in
Seminar Nasional Konservasi: “Konservasi Sumberdaya Alam Untuk Pembangunan Berkelanjutan,”
2018
, pp.
174
181
.
32.
B.
Cahyono
and
A.
Adhiatma
, “
Peran Modal Sosial Dalam Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Petani Tembakau Di Kabupaten Wonosobo
,”
CBAM-FE
, vol.
1
, no.
1
, pp.
131
144
,
2021
.
33.
T.
Tedjaningsih
and
D.
Sufyadi
, “
Social Capital and Sustainable of Mendong Farm, Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis,Vol 6
,”
J. Pemikir. Masy. Ilm. Berwawasan Agribisnis
, vol.
6
, no.
2
, pp.
588
599
,
2020
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.