This study identifies the factors that contribute to the students’ English language proficiency among Malaysian Institute of Information Technology (MIIT) undergraduates. It further explores the impacts of the undergraduates’ language proficiency towards their academic performance. A quantitative and non-experimental approach were used for data collection purposes where data were collected through online questionnaire. There were 116 participants from Universiti Kuala Lumpur (UniKL) MIIT undergraduates involved in this study. Data analyses were made using inferential and descriptive statistical analyses. Statistical analyses revealed that the undergraduates’ academic achievement was influenced by their attitude towards the use of English and their high school English performance. In contrast, the findings indicated that the undergraduates’ residency did not contribute to their English language proficiency. It was also indicated that there was a significant difference between the undergraduates’ level of English Language Proficiency based on their academic achievement. In brief, the findings of this study provide useful insights on how undergraduates’ English language proficiency is influenced by many external factors that eventually affect their academic performance. It is crucial to be proficient in English language so that not only students are able to perform excellently in school but also in tertiary institutions. After all, graduates who are proficient in English will be in demand specially to cater the need to work in the English medium environment. Thus, this research paper will provide some improvements and recommendations in assisting the tertiary institutions to produce more in demand graduates who are able to compete at the international level.

1.
J.
Abbott-Chapman
,
P. W.
Hughes
, and
C.
Wyld
, (
1992
).
2.
J. K.
Aina
,
A. G.
Ogundele
, and
S. S.
Olanipekun
,
American Journal of Educational Research
1
,
355
358
(
2013
).
3.
N. O.
Alsheikh
,
G.
Parameswaran
, and
H.
Ethoweris
,
Current Issues in Education
13
(
2010
).
4.
P.
Arsad
,
N.
Bauniyamin
, and
J.
Manan
,
WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education
11
,
44
53
(
2014
).
5.
J. A.
Atetwe
,
Analysis of the Influence of Mother Tongue on Students’ Performance in English in KCSE in Public Day Secondary Schools in Gatundu District, Kiambu County, Kenya
, Master's thesis,
The Catholic University of Eastern Africa
(
2013
).
6.
C.
Brame
,
Flipping The Classroom.
http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/flipping-the-classroom/ Accessed (17 February
2021
).
7.
D.
Çakici
,
Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty (GUJGEF)
(
2007
).
8.
S. Y.
Chyung
,
K.
Roberts
,
I.
Swanson
, and
A.
Hankinson
,
Performance Improvement
56
,
15
23
(
2017
).
9.
J.
Creswell
, Educational Research: Planning Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (
Pearson Education
,
2012
).
10.
L. J.
Cronbach
,
Psychometrika
16
,
297
334
(
1951
).
11.
A.
Duff
,
E.
Boyle
,
K.
Dunleavy
, and
J.
Ferguson
,
Personality and Individual Differences
36
,
1907
1920
12.
D. O.
Fakeye
,
Journal of Education and Practice
5
,
38
41
(
2009
).
13.
Z. S.
Genc
and
F.
Aydin
,
English Language Teaching
10
,
35
44
(
2017
).
14.
B.
Güryay
,
International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies
3
,
14
23
(
2016
).
15.
R. B.
Johnson
,
A. J.
Onwuegbuzie
, and
L. A.
Turner
,
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
1
,
112
133
(
2007
).
16.
S.
Lakshmi
and
M. A.
Mohideen
,
International Journal of Management Research and Reviews
3
, p.
2752
(
2013
).
17.
M. F.
latu
,
Factors Affecting the Learning of English as a Second Language Macroskills Among Tongan Secondary Students
, Master's thesis,
Edith Cowan University
(
1994
).
18.
G.
Li
,
W.
Chen
, and
J.-L.
Duanmu
,
Journal of Studies in International Education
14
,
389
405
(
2010
).
19.
J.
Lim
and
J.
Meer
,
Journal of Human Resources
52
,
979
997
(
2017
).
20.
V.
Marian
,
H. K.
Blumenfeld
, and
M.
Kaushanskaya
,
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
50
, (
2007
).
21.
K.
McKenzie
and
R.
Schweitzer
,
Higher Education Research & Development
20
,
21
33
(
2001
).
22.
K.
McKenzie
,
K.
Gow
, and
R.
Schweitzer
,
Higher Education Research & Development
23
,
95
112
(
2004
).
23.
P.
Pokay
and
P. C.
Blumenfeld
,
Journal of Educational Psychology
82
, p.
41
(
1990
).
24.
S.
Rahman
,
Asian EFL Journal
7
,
29
55
(
2005
).
25.
N.
Rahmat
,
L. S.
Min
,
N. A. M.
Sungif
, and
F. N. M.
Yusup
,
Advances in Language and Literary Studies
6
,
114
119
(
2015
).
26.
N.
Razali
,
The English Teacher
(
1992
).
27.
E.
Sadler-Smith
,
Educational Studies
22
,
367
379
(
1996
).
28.
I.
Sarudin
,
Z. M.
Noor
,
A. M.
Zubairi
,
T. B. T.
Ahmad
, and
M. S.
Nordin
,
World Applied Sciences Journal
21
,
88
94
(
2013
).
29.
A.
Shamsuddin
,
M. Mohamad
Ibrahim
, and
M. H.
Ghazali
,
South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law
7
,
22
30
(
2015
).
30.
I.
Sivaraman
,
A.
Al Balushi
, and
D.
Rao
,
International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR)
13
,
28
35
(
2014
).
31.
P.
Spence
and
G.-Z.
Liu
,
English for Specific Purposes
32
,
97
109
(
2013
).
32.
J. J.
Vaske
,
J.
Beaman
, and
C. C.
Sponarski
,
Leisure Sciences
39
,
163
173
(
2017
).
33.
D.
Watkins
and
J.
Hattie
,
British Journal of Educational Psychology
51
,
384
393
(
1981
).
34.
B.
Wilson
and
S. C.
Komba
(
2012
).
35.
F. J. M.
Yusof
,
N. A. A.
Bakar
, and
S.
Bilah
,
Human Sustainability Procedia
(
2017
).
36.
B.
Yushau
and
M. H.
Omar
,
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
8
,
1
15
(
2015
).
37.
Y.
Li
and
V.
Li
, “
Teaching technical communication and english language to potential engineers
,”
in IEEE International Professonal Communication 2013 Conference
(IEEE,
2013
), pp.
1
3
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.