This study aims to find the concept of Scientific Creative Problem-Solving (Sci-CPS) and its characteristics for Introductory Physics learning with biological context. This research is a mixed method with a sequential exploratory design model. The qualitative data was obtained from literature studies and interviews with lecturers and students about Introductory Physics learning. This data was analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model. Meanwhile, quantitative data was obtained from experts on the Sci-CPS guidelines, lesson plan for Introductory Physics learning with biological context, and learning materials for Introductory Physics with biological context based on scientific creativity. This data was analyzed using Aiken’s V formula to calculate the content-validity coefficient. Based on analysis of data, the characteristics of Sci-CPS are: (1) syntax, namely in the form of extraction, design, invention, and termination; (2) it is oriented towards developing scientific creativity in the form of fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration, and evaluation; (3) the ability to understand and link many concepts, apply concepts to various scientific problems, and solve problems through the scientific method and scientific creativity as instructional impacts; 4) awakening awareness about the importance of creativity and problem-solving, the courage to convey ideas, respond and appreciate other ideas and foster self-confidence as nurturant impacts.

1.
Y.
Hadzigeorgiou
,
P.
Fokialis
and
M.
Kabouropoulou
,
Creat. Educ.
3
,
603
611
(
2012
).
2.
K. S.
Meador
,
Ghif. Child Today
26
,
25
29
(
2003
).
3.
R.
Mukhopadhyay
and
M. K.
Sen
,
Int. J. Educ. Psychol. Res.
2
,
1
9
(
2013
).
4.
P.
Kind
and
V.
Kind
,
Stud. Sci. Educ.
43
,
1
37
(
2007
).
5.
N. M.
Nasri
,
Z. M.
Yusof
,
S.
Ramasamy
and
L.
Hallim
,
Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci.
9
,
670
673
(
2010
).
6.
A. M.
Daud
,
J.
Omar
,
P.
Turiman
and
K.
Osman
,
Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci.
59
,
467
474
(
2012
).
7.
M. S.
Amran
,
F. M.
Kutty
and
S.
Surat
,
Creat. Educ.
10
,
3049
3058
(
2019
).
8.
D. J.
Treffinger
,
E. C.
Selby
and
S. G.
Isaksen
,
Learn. Individ. Differ.
18
,
390
401
(
2008
).
9.
S. G.
Isaksen
and
D. J.
Treffinger
,
J. Creat. Behav.
38
,
75
101
(
2004
).
10.
S. G. J.
Mochrie
,
Am. J. Phys.
84
,
542
551
(
2016
).
11.
J. W.
Creswell
,
Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
(
3 rd ed.
) (
Los Angeles
,
Sage Publications, Inc
.,
2009
).
12.
L. R.
Aiken
,
Educ. Psychol. Meas.
45
,
131
142
(
1985
).
13.
A.
Fadllan
,
Hartono
,
Susilo
and
S.
Saptono
, “
Scientific creativity profile of mathematics and science students
,” in
International Conference on Science and Education and Technology 2018
,
ASSEHR
247
, pp.
50
55
.
14.
V. P.
Glăveanu
,
J. Theory Soc. Behav.
41
,
48
67
(
2011
).
15.
B. R.
Joyce
,
M.
Weil
and
E.
Calhoun
,
Models of Teaching 8th Edition
(
Pearson Education, Inc
.,
New Jersey
,
2009
).
16.
H.
Aktamıs
,
E.
Şahin-Pekmez
,
B. T.
Can
and
O.
Ergin
,
Developing Scientific Creativity Test
(
Turkey
,
University of Dokuz Eylul
,
2005
).
17.
S.
Demir
,
J. Educ. Pract.
6
,
181
183
(
2015
).
18.
M. B.
Ayas
and
U. Sak
Think
.
Skills Creativity
13
,
195
205
(
2014
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.