Mathematical modelling is an approach to solving mathematical problems in the real world by using mathematical models to find solutions. Mathematical modelling activity assisted by digital tools makes modelling proccess and activity run smoothly. The aim is to know how digital tools supported mathematical modelling learning. This research use systematic literature review method. The main topic of the discussion is how digital tools prompt mathematical modelling proccess, how digital tools play role for mathematical modelling learning, and what student achieve during and after mathematical modelling learning. This research get several digital tools types, such as Geogebra, MathCityMap, Gizmos, etc. This software provide features to prompt mathematical modelling proccess and learning. Student achievement in mathematics is also affected during use several digital tools for modelling activity. So, its important to know how to teach mathematical modelling using digital tools.

1.
S.
Hadi
, “The Mathematics Education Reform Movement in Indonesia” in
Sel. Regul. Lect. from 12th Int. Congr. Math. Educ.
(
Springer
,
Cham
,
2015
), pp.
253
267
.
2.
OECD
,
PISA 2018 Result
(
2019
).
4.
A.N.
Cahyono
,
M.
Ludwig
, and
S.
Marée
, “Designing Mathematical Outdoor Tasks for the Implementation of the MathCityMap-Project in Indonesia” in
7th ICMI-East Asia Reg. Conf. Math. Educ.
(
Cebu
,
2015
).
5.
H.
Zulfitri
,
Darmawijoyo
, and
Hapizah
, “Designing an Interactive Learning Media Based on Mathematical Modelling Framework” in
Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Math. Math. Educ. (ICMMEd 2020)
(
Atlantis Press
,
2021
), pp.
198
203
.
6.
E.
Kurniadi
,
Darmawijoyo
, and
W.D.
Pratiwi
, “Developing a learning design of mathematical modelling courses on understanding basic concept of mathematical modelling” in
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
(
Institute of Physics Publishing
,
2020
), p.
12033
.
7.
A.N.
Cahyono
,
Y.L.
Sukestiyarno
,
M.
Asikin
,
M.G.K.
Ahsan
, and
M.
Ludwig
,
J. Math. Educ.
11
,
181
(
2020
).
8.
W.
Blum
and
R.B.
Ferri
,
J. Math. Model. Appl.
1
,
45
(
2009
).
9.
R.
Zulkarnaen
, “Why is mathematical modeling so difficult for students?” in
AIP Conf. Proc. 2021
(
AIP Publishing
,
2021
), p.
060026
.
10.
A.
Flores
,
J.
Park
, and
S.A.
Bernhardt
, “Interactive technology to foster creativity in future mathematics teachers” in
Creat. Technol. Math. Educ.
(
Springer
,
Cham
,
2018
), pp.
149
180
.
11.
H.-S.
Siller
and
G.
Greefrath
, “Mathematical modelling in class regarding to technology” in
Proc. Sixth Congr. Eur. Soc. Res. Math. Educ.
(
Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique
,
Lyon
,
2010
), pp.
2136
2145
.
12.
A.
Manouchehri
and
A.
Sanjari
,
North Am. Chapter Int. Gr. Psychol. Math. Educ.
(
2019
).
13.
G.
Greefrath
,
C.
Hertleif
, and
H.
Siller
,
ZDM-Math. Educ.
50
,
233
(
2018
).
14.
M.G.
Frassia
and
A.
Serpe
,
Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol.
11
,
411
(
2017
).
15.
K.-C.
Ang
, “
Teaching and learning mathematical modelling with technology
” in
Electron. Proc. 15th Asian Technol. Conf. Math.
(
2010
).
16.
J.
Lowe
,
M.
Carter
, and
T.
Cooper
,
Aust. Math. Teach.
74
,
4
(
2018
).
17.
S.
Sinaga
,
Educ. Build. J. Pendidik. Tek. Bangunan Dan Sipil
4
,
25
(
2018
).
18.
Tanzimah
, “
Pembelajaran Program Linear Menggunakan Aplikasi Komputer Geogebra
” in
Pros. Semin. Nas. Progr. Pascasarj. Univ. PGRI Palembang
(
2018
), pp.
425
430
.
19.
B.
Haas
,
Y.
Kreis
, and
Z.
Lavicza
,
Proc. Br. Soc. Res. into Learn. Math.
40
,
1
(
2020
).
20.
Z.
Lavicza
,
B.
Haas
, and
Y.
Kreis
, “
Discovering Everyday Mathematical Situations Outside the Classroom with MathCityMap and GeoGebra 3D
” in
Res. Outdoor STEM Educ. Digit. Age
(
2020
), pp.
23
30
.
21.
N.
Buchholtz
,
N.
Buchholtz
,
D.C.
Orey
, and
M.
Rosa
,
World Conf. Mob. Context. Learn.
2020
,
81
(
2020
).
22.
A.
Jupri
,
Pros. Semin. Nas. Mat. Dan Pendidik. Mat.
1
,
303
(
2018
).
23.
F.D.
Permadi
and
M.A.
Rudhito
, “
Efektifitas Pembelajaran dengan Program Geogebra dibanding Pembelajaran Konvensional pada Materi Teorema Pythagoras Kelas VII SMP Pangudi Luhur Gantiwarno Klaten
” in
Pros. Semin. Nas. Mat. Dan Pendidik. Mat. FMIPA UNY
(
2012
).
24.
R.
Weinhandl
,
Z.
Lavicza
,
M.
Hohenwarter
, and
S.
Schallert
,
Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol.
8
,
1
(
2020
).
25.
F.
Arzarello
,
F.
Ferrara
, and
O.
Robutti
,
Teach. Math. Its Appl.
31
,
20
(
2012
).
26.
W.
Thalheimer
and
S.R.
Cook
,
Work Learn. Recearch
1
(
2002
).
27.
H.
Zulnaidi
,
E.
Oktavika
, and
R.
Hidayat
,
Educ. Inf. Technol.
25
,
51
(
2020
).
28.
C.
Hankeln
, “
Validating with the Use of Dynamic Geometry Software
” in
Math. Model. Educ. Sense-Making
(
2020
), pp.
277
286
.
29.
C.
Hertleif
, “
Dynamic Geometry Software In Mathematical Modelling: About The Role Of Programme-Related Self-Efficacy And Attitudes Towards Learning With The Software
” in
13th Int. Conf. Technol. Math. Teach.
(
2017
), pp.
124
134
.
30.
J.C.
Pasco
and
D.B.
Roble
,
Sci. Int.
32
,
165
(
2020
).
31.
A.
Akhirni
and
A.
Mahmudi
,
J. Pendidik. Mat. Dan Sains
3
,
91
(
2015
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.