The learning process during the covid-19 pandemic provides many challenges, one of which is in the process of understanding mathematical concepts in students. This study aims to see and determine the effect of the blended learning model with the Edmodo application on students’ mathematical conceptual understanding in terms of students’ self-confidence. This study used a quantitative approach with experimental design. The type of research design used in this study is a quasi-experimental design. The population in this study were all tenth graders from MA Plus Walisongo Kota Bumi for the 2020/2021 academic year. The sampling technique used cluster random sampling, so that the samples involved were students from class X MIA 1 and class X MIA 2. The data collection technique used a posttest which was used to determine the ability to understand students’ mathematical concepts and a questionnaire to determine the category of students’ self-confidence. The results of this study indicate that there is no effect of the blended learning model using the Edmodo application on mathematical conceptual understanding in terms of students’ self-confidence with a significance value of 0.677. Students in the Edmodo-based blended learning class got an average mathematical conceptual understanding score of 85.52, while the expository class got a score of 78.69.

1.
R.
Huang
,
A.
Tlili
,
T. W.
Chang
,
X.
Zhang
,
F.
Nascimbeni
and
D. J.
Burgos
,
Smart Learning Environments
,
7
1
15
(
2020
)
2.
R.
Sefriani
,
J. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
,
10
293
299
(
2021
)
3.
Fitriani
,
S.
Fatimah
,
T.
Herman
,
Blended learning based on ebook integrated Youtube in learning mathematics.
(
2021
)
4.
M.
Sari
,
Mengenal lebih dekat model blended learning dengan facebook: model pembelajaran untuk generasi digital.
(
2019
)
5.
T.
Yigit
,
A.
Koyun
,
A. S.
Yuksel
and
I. A.
Cankaya
,
J. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science
141
807
812
(
2014
)
6.
D.
Mahdan
,
M.
Kamaludin
,
H. F.
Wendi
and
M. V.
Simanjuntak
,
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
306
(
2018
)
7.
M.
Sintawati
,
G.
Abdurrahman
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
1521
(
2020
).
8.
M. J.
Kintu
,
C.
Zhu
and
E. J.
Kagambe
,
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
,
14
1
20
(
2017
)
9.
M.
Alamsyah
,
G.
Marhento
,
M. F.
Siburian
,
I. A. D.
Astuti
and
Y. B.
Bhakti
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
1806
(
2021
)
10.
K.
Balasubramanian
,
V.
Jarykumar
and
L. N. J.
Fukey
,
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
144
(
2014
).
11.
E.
Nurvitasari
,
N. B.
Sumanik
,
R. Z.
Maarebia
,
A. L.
Rettob
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
1569
(
2020
).
12.
Trisniawati
,
M. T.
Muanifah
,
S. A.
Widodo
and
M.
Ardiyaningrum
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
1188
(
2019
).
13.
F.
Kudri
,
R.
Rahmi
,
Y.
Haryono
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
335
(
2018
).
14.
D.
Adharini
and
T.
Herman
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
1521
(
2019
).
15.
I.
Siregar
,
Darhim
and
E. C.
Asih
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
812
(
2017
)
16.
R.
Amiyani
and
J. B.
Widjajanti
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
1157
(
2019
)
17.
Nurvitasari
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series Conference.
145
(
2020
).
18.
A.
Pertiwi
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
1157
(
2019
).
19.
Kintu
,
M.
Justice
,
C.
Zhu
and
E.
Kagambe
,
J. International Journal Educational Technology in Higher Education
14
(
2017
).
20.
Lin
,
Ya-wen
.
J. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
13
(
2017
).
21.
Ariawan
,
I. P.
Wisna
,
J. International Journal of Instruction
,
13
(
2020
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.