One of the essential ingredients in establishing trust in academic institutions among its stakeholders is the quality of its learning providers. Hence, it is imperative to continually adapt innovations to improve educators’ evaluation process and deliver a reliable result for data-driven decision-making. This study focused on enhancing the existing faculty performance evaluation system (FPES) for the Camarines Sur Polytechnic Colleges (CSPC) following the RUP’s Iterative Model as its system development methodology (SDM). A total of 75 respondents were identified using specific sampling techniques according to the respondent type. The participants’ responses from the unstructured interview and survey were the basis of the upgrade, uncovering the current status of the FPES version 1.0 (FPES v1.0) and its level of acceptability according to the ISO 9126 Software Quality Metrics. Using the same indicators, respondents evaluated the proposed FPES version 2.0 (FPES v2.0) and employed Chi-Square Statistics and Cramer’s Rule to compare the performance of both systems. Findings revealed an overall rating of 4.0025 Likert Score for the FPES v1.0, indicating its acceptability in terms of functionality, reliability, efficiency, maintainability, and portability. However, a significant improvement in the overall rating for the FPES v2.0 with a 4.53 Likert Score justifying the system as strongly acceptable. The results signify that the enhancement of the faculty performance evaluation system (FPES v2.0) manifested a positive impact in the institution’s faculty performance evaluation process, thus a favorable alternative to the existing system. Nonetheless, carrying out the recommendations, particularly enhancing the system’s functionalities as needed over time, will ensure the sustainable use of the system.

1.
Fairweather
,
J.S.
The ultimate faculty evaluation: Promotion and tenure decisions
.
New Dir Institutional Res
[Internet].
2002
[cited 2017 Aug 30];2002(114):
97
108
. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James_Fairweather/publication/227496436_The_ultimate_faculty_evaluation_Promotion_and_tenure_decisions/links/0a85e530b57e3038a4000000.pdf
3.
Dommeyer
,
C.J.
,
Baum
,
P.
,
Hanna
,
R.W.
,
Chapman
K.S.
Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in-class and online surveys: Their effects on response rates and evaluations
.
Assess Eval High Educ [Internet].
2004
[cited 2018 Jan 19];
29
(
5
):
611
23
. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cb0e/1ba96d2dbbfc2fb0efebc04a958136d3815a.pdf
4.
Anido
,
C.I.
, Ph D. Online Teaching Performance Evaluation System : A Tool for Quality Education.
2009
;
5.
Ardalan
,
A.
,
Ardalan
,
R.
,
Coppage
,
S.
,
Crouch
,
W.
A comparison of student feedback obtained through paper-based and web-based surveys of faculty teaching
.
Br J Educ Technol [Internet].
2007
[cited 2018 Jan 3];
38
(
6
):
1085
101
. Available from: http://www.csueastbay.edu/faculty/senate/committees/fac/12-13/12-13-documents/5-15-13-set-articles/web-vs-paper-set-feedback.pdf
6.
Fike
,
D.S.
,
Doyle
,
D.J.
,
Connelly
,
R.J.
Online vs. paper evaluations of faculty: when less is just as good
.
J Eff Teach [Internet].
2010
[cited 2018 Jan 3];
10
(
2
):
42
54
. Available from: https://www.uncw.edu/jet/articles/Vol10_2/Fike.pdf
7.
Hartshorne
,
R. Ph.D
,
Lambert
,
R. Ph. D
,
Ed
,
S.
,
Algozzine
,
B.
, et al. Comparison of Web-Based and Paper-Based Course Evaluations at UNC Charlotte [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2018 Jan 19]. Available from: https://facultygovernance.uncc.edu/sites/facultygovernance.uncc.edu/files/fields/faculty-council/field_fc_attachments/5a. Final Report.pdf
8.
Maryam
,
A.
,
Alireza
,
S.
,
Reza
,
N.A.
,
Azizollah
,
A.
The Examination of Strength and Weakness of Online Evaluation of Faculty Members Teaching by Students in the University of Isfahan
.
High Educ Stud [Internet].
2012
[cited 2018 Jan 19];
2
(
1
):
38
. Available from: www.ccsenet.org/hes
9.
Salas
,
L.T.
A web and mobile-based faculty performance evaluation system
.
Philipp E-Journal [Internet].
2008
[cited 2018 Jan 19];
17
(
1
). Available from: https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=9558
10.
Taguiam
,
I.M.
Web-Based Faculty Evaluation System of Apayao State College, Philippines
.
JPAIR Institutional Res [Internet].
2016
Jun 25 [cited 2018 Jan 19];
7
(
1
):
1
14
. Available from: http://philair.ph/publication/index.php/irj/article/view/367
11.
Lin
,
Q.
,
Zhu
,
Y.
,
Lu
,
H.
,
Shi
,
K.
,
Niu
,
Z.
Improving University Faculty Evaluations via multi-view Knowledge
.
Graph. Futur Gener Comput Syst.
2021
;
117
:
181
92
.
12.
Lohman
,
L.
Studies in Educational Evaluation Evaluation of university teaching as sound performance appraisal
.
Stud Educ Eval.
2021
;
70
(
August 2020
):
101008
.
13.
Celis
JHQ
,
Pagatpatan
AC
.
Web-Based Faculty Evaluation with Recommendation Support Module using Analytic Hierarchy Process Algorithm.
2019
;(
6
):
204
9
.
14.
Cimasoni
,
L.
The use of methodologies for the development of IT projects.
2009
[cited 2017 Dec 21];(November). Available from: http://diuf.unifr.ch/main/is/sites/diuf.unifr.ch.main.is/files/documents/student-projects/B-2009_Lorenzo_Cimasoni.pdf
15.
Akoglu
,
H.
User’s guide to correlation coefficients
.
Turkish J Emerg Med.
2018
;
18
(
3
):
91
3
.
16.
Johansen Caluza
,
L.B.
,
Grace Function
,
D.D.
,
Verecio
RL
,
Cinco
JC
,
Quisumbing
LA
,
Lester Laurente
M
, et al.
Faculty Performance Evaluation in A Philippine University Information Technology Program
.
IOSR J Humanit Soc Sci [Internet].
2017
[cited 2017 Dec 12];
22
(
8
):
28
36
. Available from: www.iosrjournals.org
17.
Enrico
,
P. Chavez
,
Teodoro Jr
F. Revano
.
Online Faculty Evaluation System for TIP Manila
.
TIP Res J Manila [Internet].
2000
[cited 2018 Jan 19];
5
(
1
). Available from: https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=9120
18.
Ronald
Glotzbach
, B.J.,
Burton
,
T.L.
,
Co
,
B.
Online Instructor Evaluations: A Web-Based Application
.
J Ind Technol @BULLET [Internet].
2008
[cited 2018 Feb 24];
24
(
4
). Available from: http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.atmae.org/resource/resmgr/articles/glotzbach092508.pdf
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.