Artificial diet technology is an important factor in mass-rearing insects in the laboratory. The common problem using an artificial insect diet is the presence of microbial when applied to the target. Controlling microbial growth such as fungal in the artificial diet is an important key component in preparing valuable food for insect development. The impact of humidity and temperature on an artificial diet on feeding time gives many fungal development opportunities on the media. Since a few years ago, the stalk-eye flies Teleopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae) have been mass rearing in the artificial diet-based maize grain. The one famous component against microbial growth on an artificial insect diet used Tegosept. As antimicrobial growth, Tegosept has been applied in the food of T. dalmanni to control fungi growth. The purpose of the research is to study the kind of fungal and role of Tegosept as antifungal in the artificial diet of T. dalmanni. In June through July 2021 at CU Denver Integrative Biology Research, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado Denver, USA. The artificial diet for T. dalmanni is based from maize grain for feeding adult. The observation focused kind of fungal and the role of Tegosept as antifungal activities. The observation was showed dominant fungal collected from artificial diet identified as Rhizopus sp. and Mucor sp. Commonly two fungal started growth at two days after adult feeding on the artificial diet. The presence of Mucor sp. full-grown on the seven days of observation. The result was showed Tegosept cannot inhibit fungal growth in artificial since the second day. The research concluded that Rhizopus sp. and Mucor sp. still living faster in the artificial diet contain Tegosept on the lower number (1 ml per 100 g artificial diet). Future research needs treatment in the vary number and concentration of Tegosept as an antifungal agent, then learn more about the relationship antifungal on the insect healthy on mass-rearing conditions.

1.
S.
Andersson
and
M.
Andersson
Tail Ornamentation, Size Dimorphism and Wing Length in the Genus Euplectes (Ploceinae)
,”
The Auk
,
111
,
80
86
(
1994
).
2.
E.
Bath
,
S.
Wigby
,
C.
Vincent
,
J. A.
Tobias
and
N.
Seddon
, “
Condition, Not Eyespan, Predicts Contest Outcome in Female Stalk-Eyed Flies
,”
Teleopsis Dalmanni. Ecol. Evol.
5
,
1826
1836
(
2015
).
3.
R.H.
Baker
and
G. S.
Wilkinson
. “
Phylogenetic Analysis of Sexual Dimorphism and Eye-Span Allometry in Stalk-Eyed Flies (Diopsidae)
,”
Evolution
55
,
1373
385
(
2001
).
4.
J. F.
Husak
,
G.
Ribak
,
G. S.
Wilkinson
and
J. G.
Swallow
, “
Compensation for Exaggerated Eye Stalks in Stalk-Eyed Flies (Diopsidae)
,”
Fuctional Ecology
,
25
,
608
616
(
2011
).
5.
Sopian
and
P.
Hidayat
, “
Jenis Dan Habitat “Lalat Mata Bertangkai” (Diptera: Diopsidae) Di Bogor
,”
J. Entomol. Indon.
3
,
94
103
(
2006
).
6.
H. H.
Toba
,
A. N.
Kishaba
,
R.
Pangaldan
and
S.
Riggs
, “
Laboratory Rearing of Pepper Weevils on Artificial Diets
,”
J. Econ. Entomol.
62
,
257
258
(
1969
).
7.
P. P.
Sikorowski
,
A. D.
Kent
,
O. H.
Lindig
,
G.
Wiygul
and
J.
Robertson
, “
Laboratory And Insectary Studies on The Use of Antibiotics and Antimicrobial Agents in Mass-Rearing of Boll Weevil
,”
J. Econ. Entomol.
73
,
106
110
(
1980
).
8.
P.
Singh
and
G. E.
Bucher
, “
Efficacy Of “Safe” Levels of Antimicrobial Food Additives to Control Microbial Contaminants in A Synthetic Diet for Agria Affinis Larvae
,”
Entomol Exp. Appl.
14
,
297
309
(
1971
).
9.
S. D.
Moore
,
G. I.
Richards
,
C.
Chambers
and
D
,
Hendry
, “
An Improved Larval Diet for Commercial Mass Rearing of the False Codling Moth
,”
African Entomology
,
22
(
2014
).
10.
S. N.
Aminah
,
A. P.
Saranga
,
N.
Agus
,
A.
Achmad
and
I.
Ridwan
, “
Two Artificial Diet Formulations for Troides Helena Linne Larvae (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) In Bantimurung-Bulusaraung National Park, South Sulawesi
,”
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research,
3
,
170
173
(
2014
).
11.
E. W.
Clark
,
C. A.
Richmond
and
J. M.
McGough
, “
Artificial Media and Rearing Techniques for the Pink Bollworm
,”
J. Econ. Entomol
54
,
4
9
(
1961
).
12.
J.
Alverson
and
A. C.
Cohen
, “
Effect of Antifungal Agents on Biological Fitness of Lygus hesperus (Heteroptera: Miridae)
,”
Journal of Economic Entomology
95
,
256
260
(
2002
).
13.
M. T.
Ouye
, “
Effects of Antimicrobial Agents on Micro-Organisms and Pink Bollworm Development
,”
J. Econ. Entomol.
55
,
854
857
(
1962
).
14.
A. N.
Kishaba
,
T. J.
Henneberry
,
R.
Pangaldan
and
P. H.
Tsao
, “
Effects of Mold Inhibitors in Larval Diet on the Biology of The Cabbage Looper
,”
J. Econ. Entomol.
61
,
1189
1194
(
1968
).
15.
M. H.
Bass
and
E. E.
Barnes
, “
Toxicities of Antimicrobial Agents to White-Fringed Beetle Larvae and the Effectiveness of Certain of these Agents Against Microbial Growth
,”
J. Econ Entomol.
62
,
718
719
(
1969
).
16.
P. A.
Hedin
,
A. C.
Thompson
,
R. C.
Gueldner
and
R. D.
Henson
, “
Analysis of the Antimicrobial Agents, Potassium Sorbate and Methyl-P-Hydroxybenzoate, in Boll Weevil Diets
,”
J. Econ. Entomol.
67
,
147
149
(
1974
).
17.
G. D.
Inglis
and
A. C.
Cohen
, “
Influence of Antimicrobial Agents on the Spoilage of a Meat-Based Entomophage Diet
,”
Journal of Economic Entomology
,
97
,
235
250
(
2004
).
18.
E. S. A.
Wangge
,
D. N.
Suprapta dan
G. N. A. S.
Wirya
, “
Isolasi dan Identifikasi Jamur Penghasil Mikotoksin Pada Biji Kakao Kering yang Dihasilkan di Flores
,”
J. Agric. Sci and Biotechnol.
1
,
39
47
(
2012
).
19.
M. J.
Carlile
,
S. C.
Watkinson
and
G. W.
Goodway
, “The Fungi,” (
Academic Press
,
London
,
2001
).
20.
W. G.
Sorenson
and
C. W.
Hesseltine
, “
Carbon and Nitrogen Utilization by Rhizopus Oligosporus
,”
Mycologia
58
,
681
689
(
1966
).
21.
E.
Moore-Landecker
, “Fundamentals of The Fungi,” (
Prentice-Hall of Canada Ltd
.,
Toronto
,
1972
).
22.
C.
Gifawesen
,
B. R.
Funke
and
F. I.
Proshold
, “
Control Of Antifungal-Resistant Strain of Aspergillus Niger Mold Contaminants in Insect Rearing Media
,”
J. Econ. Entomol
68
,
44
444
(
1975
)
23.
B. R.
Funke
, “
Mold Control for Insect-Rearing Media
,”
Entomol. Soc. Am
29
,
41
44
(
1983
).
24.
K. A.
Roeder
,
I.
Kuriachan
,
S. B.
Vinson
, and
S. T.
Behmer
, “
Evaluation of a Microbial Inhibitor in Artificial Diets of a Generalist Caterpillar, Heliothis virescens
,”
J Insect Sci.
10
(
2010
).
25.
USBiological Life Sciences, T2300 Tegosept (Drosophila Anti-Fungal Agent)
, Available at: https://www.usbio.net/biochemicals/T2300.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.