This research was carried out to investigate the effect of using design thinking approach (PR) in the online learning environment on the achievement of third semester Design and Technology course trainee teachers at the Institute of Teacher Education (IPG). This research also aimed to investigate whether there are differences of the effects of intervention using design thinking approach in the online learning for one group in comparison with another group who used online learning without the intervention. The self regulation among different trainees teachers was investigated accordingly. A pre-test and post-test quasi experimental design were used in this research. There were 134 teacher trainees involved from two different IPGs from Northern of Peninsular Malaysia. The first group was from one IPG that was Experiment 1 (E1) and the other as the second group that was Experiment 2 (E2). Both groups will undergo online self regulatory questionaire; which will measure the level of self regulation of the trainee teachers; the high and low level self regulated. Group E1 used the design thinking approach in the online learning environment with PR (Pemikiran Reka Bentuk/Design Thought) method whereas E2 used design thinking approach in the online learning environment method without PR. The achievement test on the topic of workshop safety management was used to measure their achievement and its retention towards achievement. The research hypothesis was tested by statistical inference using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) technique. The research findings showed that the use of design thinking approach in online learning environment had positive effect on the achievement on the topic of workshop safety management among high self regulated trainee teachers in comparison to low self regulated trainee teachers. The implications of this research findings suggest that the use of design thinking approach in online learning environment was able to provide an effective learning strategy in Design and Technology course in IPG as it had provided a systematic way of thinking in order to design and produce a product in an autonomous online learning environment.

1.
JKKP
. “
Pelan Induk Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan 2016-2020. Putrajaya
:”
Kementerian Sumber Manusia
,
Malaysia
. (
2016
)
2.
M.E.
Ismail
,
H.
Harun
,
A.A
Razzaq
,
I.I
Mahazir
,
N. Abd
Samad
&
H.
Othman
, “
Perceptions, Knowledge, and Attitudes of Students towards Safety Practice in Culinary Laboratories
.”
Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan
,
24
(
1
),
23
31
(
2018
)
3.
R. Che
Juhan
. “
Tahap Kesediaan Pelajar Kejuruteraan Politeknik Terhadap Keselamatan Di dalam Bengkel
.”
Diperoleh dari
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/4168/4/ROSLENA_CHE_JUHAN.pdf html (
2012
)
4.
M.A.
Rahman
, “
Tahap Kesedaran Guru-Guru Tadika Terhadap Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan di Tempat Kerja
Kajian Kes Di Negeri Melaka
. (Tesis Kedoktoran,
Universiti Utara Malaysia
,
Kedah, Malaysia
) (
2012
)
5.
B.J.
Zimmerman
&
D.H.
Schunk
. “
Self-regulated Learning and Performance
.”
Dalam
B.
J.
Zimmerman
&
D. H.
Schunk
,
Handbook of Self-regulation of Learning and Performance
(pp.
1
12
).
New York
:
Routledge
(
2011
)
6.
Bolhuis
,
Sanneke
, and
Marinus JM
Voeten
. "
Toward self-directed learning in secondary schools: What do teachers do?
."
Teaching and Teacher Education
17
, no.
7
:
837
855
(
2001
).
7.
S.G
Paris
&
P.
Winograd
The role of self-regulated learning in contextual teaching:” Principles and practices for teacher preparation
.
Preparing Teachers to Use Contextual Teaching and Learning Strategies to Improve Student Success in and beyond School
,
1
,
1
23
. (
2003
)
8.
B.
Anderton
, “
Using the online course to promote self-regulated learning strategies in pre-service teachers
.”
Journal of Interactive Online Learning
,
5
(
2
),
156
177
(
2006
)
9.
S.S.
Ko
&
S.
Rossen
Teaching Online:” A Practical Guide
(Second).
New York
:
Houghton Mifflin
. (
2008
)
10.
A.D.
Benson
. “
Using Online Learning To Meet Workforce Demand: A Case Study of Stakeholder Influence
.”
Quarterly Review of Distance Education
,
3
(
4
),
443
452
. (
2002
)
11.
M.
Ally
. “
Foundations of educational theory for online learning
.”
Theory and practice of online learning
22
,
1
31
. (
2008
)
12.
A.Y
Abdelraheem
. “
Computerized learning environments:” Problems, design challenges and future promises
.
Journal of Interactive Online Learning
,
2
(
2
),
1
9
. (
2003
)
13.
L.K Joyce
Hwee
,
S.C
Ching
,
Benjamin
Wong
, &
H.
Huang-Yao
.
Design Thinking for Education. Singapore:”
Springer
. (
2015
)
14.
M.
Bower
,
K.
Highfield
,
P.
Furney
&
L.
Mowbray
. “
Supporting pre-service teachers’ technology-enabled learning design thinking through whole of programme transformation
.”
Educational Media International
,
50
(
1
),
39
50
. doi: (
2013
)
15.
T.J.
Huffman
&
M.A
Figueroa
. “
The Effects of Design Thinking Methods on Pre-service PK-12 Engineering and STEM Teacher Capabilities, Confidence, and Motivation in Creativity
.”
Kertas dibentang di American Society for Engineering Education
,
Azores, Portugal
. (
2017
)
16.
C.P.
Coutinho
. “
Web 2.0 tools in pre-Service Teacher Education Programs” An Example From Portugal.
Reading
,
UK
:
Academic Publishing Limited
. (
2008
)
17.
L.
Gill
&
B.
Dalgarno
. “
Influences on pre-service teachers’ preparedness to use ICTs in the classroom
.”
Proceedings of ascilite 2008 Melbourne,
330
339
. (
2008
)
18.
J.
Lei
. “
Digital Natives as Preservice Teachers:” What Technology Preparation Is Needed?
Journal of Computing in Teacher Education
,
25
(
3
),
87
98
. (
2009
)
19.
Mahmud
,
Rosnaini
, &
M.A.
Ismail
. "
Impact of training and experience in using ICT on in-service teachers’ basic ICT literacy
."
Malaysian journal of educational technology
10
, no.
2
:
5
10
. (
2010
)
20.
F.
Saltan
&
K.
Arslan
. “
A comparison of in-service and pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge self-confidence
.”
Cogent Education
,
4
(
1
),
1
12
. (
2017
)
21.
J.
Hammond
&
M.
Macken-Horarik
. “
Teachers’ voices, teachers’ practices: Insider perspectives on literacy education
.”
Australian Journal of Language and Literacy
,
24
(
2
),
1038
1562
. (
2001
)
22.
J.
Nelson
,
A.
Christopher
&
C.
Mim
.
“TPACK and web 2.0:” Transformation of teaching and learning.
(
2009
)
23.
Y.
Goktas
,
S.
Yildirim
&
Z.
Yildirim
. “
Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs
.”
Educational Technology and Society
,
12
(
1
),
193
204
. (
2009
)
24.
Z.
Zhang
. “
Teaching ICT to Pre-Service Teachers
.”
LEARNing Landscapes
,
8
(
1
),
323
337
. (
2014
)
25.
R.
Hall
,
L.
Atkins
, &
J.
Fraser
. “
Defining a self-evaluation digital literacy framework for secondary educators:” The DigiLit Leicester project
.
Research in Learning Technology
,
22
. (
2014
)
26.
S.
Pedersen
&
M.
Liu
Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment
.”
Educational Technology Research and Development
,
51
(
2
),
57
76
. (2003)
27.
R.R.
Said
, &
A.R.
Jamian
, "
AMALAN PENGAJARAN KARANGAN GURU CEMERLANG DI DALAM BILIK DARJAH: KAJIAN SATU KES PELBAGAI LOKASI
."
Journal of Educators & Education/Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan
27
(
2012
).
28.
D.
Ling
. “
Complete Design Thinking Guide for Successful Professionals. Singapore
:”
Emerge Creatives.
(
2015
)
29.
Y.B.
Kafai
,
M.L.
Franke
,
C.C.
Ching
, &
J.C.
Shih
, "
Game design as an interactive learning environment for fostering students’ and teachers’ mathematical inquiry
."
International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning
3
, no.
2
:
149
184
. (
1998
)
30.
M.E.
Ismail
,
H.
Othman
,
M.H.
Amiruddin
&
A.
Ariffin
. “
The use of animation video in teaching to enhance the imagination and visualization of student in engineering drawing
.” In
IOP conference series: materials science and engineering
(Vol.
203
, No.
1
, p.
012023
).
IOP Publishing
. (
2017
, May)
31.
F.
Krauss
, &
M.
Ally
, "
A study of the design and evaluation of a learning object and implications for content development
."
Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects
1
, no.
1
:
1
22
. (
2005
)
32.
D.T.
Campbell
&
J.C.
Stanley
, J. C. “
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design for Research
.”
Hopewell
,
NJ
:
Houghton Mifflin Company
. (
1963
)
33.
L.
Sasai
.
The Relationship between Self Regulated Learning and The Use of Online Portfolios in an Online Learning Environment.”
(
Disertasi Kedoktoran
,
Massey University, New Zealand
). (
2015
)
34.
L.
Barnard
,
W.Y
Lan
,
Y.M
To
,
V.O
Paton
&
S.L
Lai
. “
Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments
.”
Internet and Higher Education
,
12
(
1
),
1
6
. doi: (
2009
)
35.
T.F.
McManus
. “
Individualizing instruction in a web-based hypermedia learning environment:” Nonlinearity, advance organizers, and self-regulated learners
.
Journal of Interactive Learning Research
,
11
,
219
251
. (
2000
)
36.
P.R.
Pintrich
,
D.F
Smith
,
T
Garcia
&
W.J
Mckeachie
. “
Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq
).”
Educational and Psychological Measurement
,
53
(
3
),
801
813
. (
1993
)
37.
P.
Mallery
&
D.
George
.
SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference”.
Boston
:
Allyn, Bacon
. (
2003
)
38.
IPGM
. “
Buku Panduan Penggubalan Kertas Peperiksaan (Cetakan Kedua). Cyberjaya
:”
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
(
2014
)
39.
A.J.
Nitko
, & Brookhart. “
Educational assessment of students. (Sixth Edition). Boston” Pearson Education Inc
.
TechTrends
,
53
(
5
),
80
87
. (
2011
)
40.
S.R.
Schmidt
, &
J.N.
Bohannon
,
"In defense of the flashbulb-memory hypothesis: A comment on McCloskey, Wible, and Cohen (1988)."
:
332
. (
1988
)
41.
A.
Moursund
, &
Ø.
Kravdal
, "
Individual and community effects of women’s education and autonomy on contraceptive use in India
."
Population studies
57
, no.
3
:
285
301
. (
2003
)
42.
P.
Tantrarungroj
&
P.
Suwannatthachote
, “
Enhancing Pre-service Teacher’s Self-efficacy and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Designing Digital Media with Self-regulated Learning Instructional Support in Online Project-Based Learning
.”
Creative Education
,
3
,
77
81
. (
2012
)
43.
Prayekti
. “
Effect of Self-Regulated Learning and Motivation to Achieve Against Teacher Professional Capability for Student S1 PGSD of Science Field Compared with Regular Student S1 PGSD at UPBJJ Serang
.”
Journal of Education and Practice
,
6
(
36
),
47
55
. (
2015
)
44.
L.
Barnard
,
V.
Paton
&
W.
Lan
. “
Online Self • Regulatory Learning Behaviors as a Mediator in the Relationship between Online Course Perceptions with Achievement
.”
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
,
9
(
2
),
1
8
. (
2006
)
45.
Barnard
,
L.
Dale
,
W.D.
Craig
,
K.
Bailey
,
M.
Heiner
,
R.
Montgomery
,
L.
Lauridsen
,
P.K.S.
Chan
, and
R.W.
Sidwell
, "
Evaluation of immunomodulators, interferons and known in vitro SARS-coV inhibitors for inhibition of SARS-coV replication in BALB/c mice
."
Antiviral Chemistry and Chemotherapy
17
, no.
5
:
275
284
. (
2005
)
46.
W.Y
Lan
,
R.
Bremer
,
T.
Stevens
&
G.
Mullen
. “
Self-regulated learning in the online environment.”
Paper presented at the 2004 annual meeting American Educational Research Association
,
April 7-8
,
San Diego
. (
2004
)
47.
J.D.
Young
. “
The Effect of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies on Performance in Learner Controlled Computer-Based Instruction
.”
Educational Technology Research and Development
,
44
(
2
),
17
27
. (
1996
)
48.
J.
Lave
&
E.
Wenger
. “
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
.
Cambridge, England
:”
Cambridge University Press
. Doi: (
1991
)
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.