Augmented Reality (AR) is the technology to combine virtual information and the real world. Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) is a method that could be implemented in AR. SIFT has good stability and invariance, give high performance, and implemented by many applications. However SIFT itself has a disadvantage, it is not the flawless matching of the SIFT descriptor. In this research, we propose one of the image processing techniques, which is called logarithmic transformation. Our research aims to produce output value of combination Logarithmic Transformation and SIFT algorithm. The steps of our proposed method start from extracting video to sequential image, increase the quality of each frame using logarithmic transformation, and implement SIFT and evaluate this method with total keypoint matching. Combination LIP and SIFT will be compared with SIFT standard. We examined our research with rotation and distance. The result of LIP SIFT can increase the performance of SIFT standard as much as 16% for rotation and 1,5 % for distance-based SIFT standard.

1.
Y.
Chen
,
Q.
Wang
,
H.
Chen
,
X.
Song
,
H.
Tang
, and
M.
Tian
, “
An overview of augmented reality technology
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
, vol.
1237
, no.
2
, 2019, doi: .
2.
A.
Edwards-Stewart
,
T.
Hoyt
, and
G. M.
Reger
, “
Classifying different types of augmented reality technology
,”
Annu. Rev. CyberTherapy Telemed.
, vol.
14
, no. January, pp.
199
202
,
2016
.
3.
G.
Dandachi
,
A.
Assoum
,
B.
Elhassan
, and
F.
Dornaika
, “
Machine learning schemes in augmented reality for features detection
,”
2015 5th Int. Conf. Digit. Inf. Commun. Technol. Its Appl. DICTAP 2015
, no. July 2017, pp.
101
105
,
2015
, doi: .
4.
G.
Dandachi
,
A.
Assoum
,
B.
Elhassan
, and
F.
Dornaika
, “
Machine learning schemes in augmented reality for features detection
,” in
2015 5th International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and Its Applications, DICTAP 2015
,
2015
, pp.
101
105
, doi: .
5.
S. Kumari
Mandal
,
M.
Pinkeshwar
, and
K.
Tiwari
, “
A Survey : Augmented Reality for Guidance Using Various Techniques-Surf , Viola and Sift
,”
Int. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. Res.
, vol.
4
, no.
12
, pp.
4325
4329
,
2015
.
6.
S.
Rajappa
and
G.
Raj
, “
Application and scope analysis of Augmented Reality in marketing using image processing technique
,” in
Proceedings of the 2016 6th International Conference - Cloud System and Big Data Engineering, Confluence 2016
,
2016
, pp.
435
440
, doi: .
7.
D.
Lowe
, “
Object recognition from local scale-invariant features
,” in
International Conference on Computer Vision
,
1999
, vol.
2
, pp.
1150
1157
, doi: ).
8.
D. G.
Lowe
, “
Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints
,”
Int. J. Comput. Vis.
, vol.
60
, no.
2
, pp.
91
110
,
2004
.
9.
S.
Sheena
and
M.
Sheena
, “
A Comparison of SIFT and SURF Algorithm for The Recognition of an Efficient Iris Biometric System
,”
Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng.
, vol.
5
, no. Special Issue 1, pp.
37
42
,
2016
, doi: .
10.
S. A. K.
Tareen
and
Z.
Saleem
, “
A comparative analysis of SIFT, SURF, KAZE, AKAZE, ORB, and BRISK
,” in
2018 International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies: Invent, Innovate and Integrate for Socioeconomic Development, iCoMET 2018 - Proceedings
,
2018
, vol.
2018
-Janua, pp.
1
10
, doi: .
11.
O.
Akcay
and
E. O.
Avsar
, “
The effect of image enhancement methods during feature detection and matching of thermal images
,”
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. - ISPRS Arch.
, vol.
42
, no.
1
W1, pp.
575
578
,
2017
, doi: .
12.
F.
Alhwarin
,
C. J.
Wang
,
D.
Ristic-Durrant
, and
A.
Gräser
, “
Improved SIFT-Features Matching for Object Recognition
,” in
Visions of Computer Science - BCS International Academic Conference (VOCS)
,
2008
, pp.
179
190
, doi: .
13.
S.
Chanthamongkol
,
B.
Purahong
, and
A.
Lasakul
, “
Dorsal Hand Vein Image Enhancement for Improve Recognition Rate Based on SIFT Keypoint Matching
,” in
2nd International Symposium on Computer, Communication, Control and Automation (3CA 2013)
,
2013
, pp.
174
177
.
14.
P.
Shyam
,
A.
Bangunharcana
, and
K. S.
Kim
, “
Retaining image feature matching performance under low light conditions
,” in
International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems
,
2020
, pp.
1079
1085
, doi: .
15.
A.
Gupta
and
R.
Sharma
, “
Underwater image enhancement using HOG and SIFT method
,”
Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol.
, vol.
8
, no.
6
, pp.
3275
3279
,
2019
, doi: .
16.
H.
Kundra
and
J.
Kaur
, “
Comparative Study of Particle Swarm Optimization based Unsupervised Clustering Techniques
,”
IJCSNS Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur.
, vol.
9
, no.
10
, p.
132
,
2009
.
17.
U.
Manikpuri
and
Y.
Yadav
, “
Image Enhancement Through Logarithmic Transformation
,”
Int. J. Innov. Res. Adv. Eng.
, vol.
1
, no.
8
, pp.
357
362
,
2014
.
18.
R.
Maini
and
H.
Aggarwal
, “
A Comprehensive Overview of Image Enhancement Techniques
,”
J. Comput.
, vol.
2
, no.
3
, pp.
8
13
,
2010
, doi: .
19.
V.
Voronin
,
S.
Tokareva
,
E.
Semenishchev
, and
S.
Agaian
, “
Thermal image enhancement algorithm using local and global logarithmic transform histogram matching with spatial equalization
,” in
Proceedings of the IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation
,
2018
, vol.
2018
-April, pp.
5
8
, doi: .
20.
S. A. K.
Tareen
and
Z.
Saleem
, “
A comparative analysis of SIFT, SURF, KAZE, AKAZE, ORB, and BRISK
,”
2018 Int. Conf. Comput. Math. Eng. Technol. Inven. Innov. Integr. Socioecon. Dev. iCoMET 2018 - Proc.
, vol.
2018
-Janua, pp.
1
10
,
2018
, doi: .
21.
E.
Karami
,
S.
Prasad
, and
M.
Shehata
, “
Image matching using SIFT, SURF, BRIEF and ORB: Performance comparison for distorted images
,” in
Newfoundland Electrical and Computer Engineering Conference
,
2015
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.