Mathematics contributes an important role in science that provides the basis for the logic of human thinking. This study was a survey to know the influence of learning discipline and mastery of mathematical concepts on physics learning outcomes of high school students, either directly or indirectly, with 180 public high school students in South Jakarta as the research sample. The research data used test questions to understand mathematical concepts and physics learning outcomes, while the learning discipline data used a questionnaire with a Likert scale. The data obtained were tested for validity and reliability and analyzed using software tools for partial least squares, structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The analysis results prove that there was a direct effect of learning discipline and mastery of mathematical concepts towards learning outcomes of physics, student learning discipline on mastery of mathematical concepts, and an indirect effect of learning discipline on learning outcomes of physics through mastery of mathematical concepts. Based on research, understanding and mastering mathematical concepts is a prerequisite for achieving maximum physics learning outcomes.

Topics
Students, Educational institutions, Learning and learning models, Educational assessment, Statistical analysis, Partial least squares
1.
Y.
 
Mine
,
H.
 
Hiraishi
, and
F.
 
Mizoguchi
, "Collaboration of networked home electronics using multi-agent technology," in
Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS
 
12
,
2648
(
Springer
,
New York
,
2012
).
Google Scholar
 
2.
V.
 
Sathishkumar
,
R.
 
Radha
,
A.
 
Saravanakumar
, and
K.
 
Mahalakshmi
,
Int. J. Control Autom.
 
13
,
1088
(
2020
).
Google Scholar
 
3.
S.M.
 
Veri
,
N.
 
Jalinus
,
H.
 
Maksum
,
I.P.
 
Edi
, and
Y.
 
Jamilah
,
Int. J. Educ. Dyn.
 
2
,
263
(
2019
).
https://doi.org/10.24036/ijeds.v2i1.256
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
4.
O. S.
 
Ehiane
,
Int. J. Acad. Res. Progress. Educ. Dev.
 
3
, (
2014
).
Google Scholar
 
5.
R.
 
VanderLind
,
Learn. Assist. Rev.
 
22
,
39
(
2017
).
Google Scholar
 
6.
D.
 
Kaya
,
EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ.
 
13
,
1619
(
2016
).
Google Scholar
 
7.
K.
 
Gravemeijer
,
M.
 
Stephan
,
C.
 
Julie
,
F. L.
 
Lin
, and
M.
 
Ohtani
,
Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ.
 
15
,
105
(
2017
).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
A.
 
Bosman
,
South African J. Educ.
 
38
,
1
(
2018
).
https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n1a1440
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
9.
C. O. G.
 
Ibibo
 and
O. I.
 
Francis
,
Int. J. Theor. Math. Phys.
 
7
,
61
(
2017
).
Google Scholar
 
10.
O. R.
 
Ademola
,
Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ.
 
2
,
48
(
2008
).
Google Scholar
 
11.
S.
 
Turgut
 and
I. G.
 
Turgut
,
Int. J. Instr.
 
11
,
663
(
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
12.
F.
 
Razak
,
JRAMathEdu J. Res. Adv. Math. Educ.
 
1
,
49
(
2016
).
https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v1i1.1785
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
13.
E. C.
 
Alabekee
,
A.
 
Samuel
, and
S. D.
 
Osaat
,
Int. J. Educ. Learn. Dev.
 
3
,
67
(
2015
).
Google Scholar
 
14.
I.
 
Cimermanová
,
Int. J. Instr.
 
11
,
219
(
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
15.
M. G.
 
Erikson
 and
M.
 
Erikson
,
Stud. High. Educ.
 
44
,
2293
(
2019
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1486813
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
16.
C. Elde
 
Mølstad
 and
B.
 
Karseth
,
Eur. Educ. Res. J.
 
15
,
329
(
2016
).
https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116639311
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
17.
N. Okur
 
Akçay
 and
K.
 
Doymuş
,
J. Turkish Sci. Educ.
 
11
,
17
(
2012
).
Google Scholar
 
18.
J.
 
Jufrida
,
W.
 
Kurniawan
,
A.
 
Astalini
,
D.
 
Darmaji
,
D. A.
 
Kurniawan
, and
W.A.
 
Maya
,
Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ.
 
8
,
401
(
2019
).
Google Scholar
 
19.
A.
 
Ogunleye
,
A. O. A.
 
Awofala
, and
E. A.
 
Adekoya
,
Chemistry (Easton)
.
23
,
863
(
2014
).
Google Scholar
 
20.
B. R.
 
Tumilaar
,
J. Ris. Ekon. Manaj. Bisnis Akunt.
 
3
,
787
(
2015
).
Google Scholar
 
21.
I. K. R.
 
Sudiarditha
,
D.
 
Susita
, and
T. M.
 
Kartini
,
Trikonomika
 
18
,
27
(
2019
).
Google Scholar
 
22.
M. R.
 
Matthews
,
Theor. Res. Educ.
 
12
,
98
(
2014
).
https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878513517341
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
23.
I.
 
Thoha
 and
D.
 
Wulandari
,
IOSR J. Res. Method Educ.
 
6
,
100
(
2016
).
Google Scholar
 
24.
J.
 
Lopes
 and
C.
 
Oliveira
, "Classroom Discipline: Theory and Practice," in
Classrooms: Academic Content and Behavior Strategy Instruction for Students With and Without Disabilities
, edited by
J. P.
 
Bakken
 (
Nova Science Publishers
,
New York
,
2017
), pp.
231
–
253
.
Google Scholar
 
25.
D.
 
Chancharoen
 and
C.
 
Cruthaka
,
Asian J. Educ. Train.
 
7
,
1
(
2021
).
https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2021.71.1.6
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
26.
Virgana
,
J. Educ. Learn. EduLearn
 
13
,
212
(
2019
).
https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i2.9917
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
27.
F.
 
Nurhasanah
,
Y. S.
 
Kusumah
, and
J.
 
Sabandar
,
IJEME - Int. J. Emerg. Math. Educ.
 
1
,
53
(
2017
).
https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v1i1.5782
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
28.
L. J.
 
Matic
,
Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ.
 
9
,
13
(
2014
).
https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/278
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
29.
O. S. O.
 
Smith
,
The Influence of Language on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics
(
Walden University ScholarWorks Walden
,
West Indies
,
2017
).
Google Scholar
 
30.
C.
 
Naroth
 and
K.
 
Luneta
,
Afr. J. Res. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ.
 
19
,
267
(
2015
).
Google Scholar
 
31.
T.
 
Ahmed
,
M. S.
 
Khan
,
D.
 
Thitivesa
,
Y.
 
Siraphatthada
, and
T.
 
Phumdara
,
Hum. Syst. Manag.
 
39
,
589
(
2020
).
https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-201052
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
32.
J.
 
Jusnani
,
J. Pendidik.
 
1
,
53
(
2019
).
Google Scholar
 
33.
S.
 
Susianah
 and
H. M.
 
Yusuf
,
J. Pendidik. Fis.
 
3
,
79
(
2015
).
Google Scholar
 
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2022 Author(s).
2022
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.