Mathematics has an abstract study concept. Teachers must have the ability to teach abstract concepts for students, especially for slow learners. This study aims to describe the mathematics pedagogical knowledge of pre-service teachers. This research is a survey research using quantitative methods. The subjects of this research were 340 students of the primary school teacher education department taking inclusive education courses at Universitas Ahmad Dahlan. Sampling technique based on Isaac & Michael table with a significance level of 5% as many as 172 respondents. Data were collected using a valid and reliable pedagogical knowledge test instrument. The results showed that mathematics pedagogical knowledge for slow learners teachers was in the High category. It shows that the pre-service teacher has a good understanding of teaching mathematics to slow learner students. Students obtained their ability from the theory in classes and observations in primary schools.

1.
S.
Haji
,
J. Pendidik.
10
,
1
10
(
2009
).
2.
J.
Piaget
,
Int. J. Psychol.
3
,
281
299
(
1968
).
3.
Z. M.
Yon
,
C. S.
Chai
, and
H.
So
,
Austr. J. Educ. Technol.
34
,
57
71
(
2018
).
4.
Nursiah
,
Mailizar
, and
S.
Munzir
, “
Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of in-position teacher profession education (TPE) students of mathematics education
,” in
The 2nd Science and Mathematics International Conference (SMIC 2020)
,
AIP Conference Proceedings
2331
, edited by Meiliasariet al. (
AIP Publishing, New York
,
2021
), pp.
1
6
.
5.
Kemendiknas
, Permendiknas 70 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pendidikan Inklusif (
Kemendiknas
,
Jakarta
,
2009
).
6.
Yusuf
,
Munawir
,
S.
Choiri
, and
M.
Supratiwi
,
J. Pendidik. Pengemb.
4
,
147
154
(
2017
).
7.
S.R.
Shaw
,
D.
Grimes
, and
J.
Bulman
.
Chart. Sch. Resour. J.
1
,
10
9
(
2005
).
8.
Peltopuro
, et al.,
Intellect. Dev. Disabill.
52
,
419
443
(
2014
).
9.
Oliver
,
Mike
, and
C.
Barnes
,
British J. Socio. Educ.
31
,
547
560
(
2010
).
10.
P.
Albert
,
Int. J. Res. Grant.
6
,
407
412
(
2018
).
11.
S.
Chauhan
,
Inter. J. Multi. Res.
1
,
279
289
(
2011
).
12.
Yasiralsamiri
,
Cakra. Pendidik.
37
,
356
365
(
2018
).
13.
M.
Myers
, “
Students with Disabilities: Perspectives of Regular Education Teachers of Increased Inclusion
,” Ph. D. thesis, East Tennesse State University,
2014
.
14.
Meltz
, et al.,
South Afric. J. Educ.
34
,
1
8
(
2014
).
15.
Mumpuniarti
, et al.,
Cakra. Pendidik.
39
,
217
229
(
2020
)
16.
J. C.
Pratiwi
, “Sekolah Inklusi Untuk Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus : Tanggapan Terhadap Tantangan Kedepannya,” in
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan
(
Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
,
Surakarta
,
2015
), pp.
237
242
.
17.
Kemdikbud
.
Gambaran sekolah inklusif di Indonesia. Pusat Data dan Statistik Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta
, (
2016
)
18.
T.
Raykov
and
G. A.
Marcoulides
, Introduction to Psychometric Theory (
Routledge
,
London
,
2011
).
19.
R. L.
Ebel
, and
D. A.
Frisbie
, Essentials of Educational Measurement (
Prentice-Hall
,
New Jersey
,
1991
.). pp.
76
99
.
20.
M. A.
Aqib
,
M.T.
Budiarto
, and
P.
Wijayanti
,
J. Phys.Conf. Ser.
947
,
1
5
(
2018
).
21.
V. I.
Dolgova
, et al.,
Espacios.
38
,
1
9
(
2017
).
22.
E. A.
Kirillova
and
A. T.
Faizrakhmanova
,
IEJME -Mathe. Educ.
11
,
647
656
(
2016
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.