The aim of this study is to examine how the scientific approach to the STAD cooperative environment becomes an effective strategy that makes student achievement and motivation possible for teachers. A literature review with a cumulative review type is the type of research used with steps such as: choosing a topic related to the scientific approach with a cooperative STAD setting, selecting articles and books that have criteria related to the topic and the last 10 years that have been selected as a theoretical basis based on expert opinion. A comparison between the scientific approach and the scientific approach of the STAD cooperative setting is the basis of the integration process in this study. The results of this study are positive verifiers, indicating that the integration approach is more easily adapted by the teacher because the teacher learning process provides the students with the material more easily. As for the steps of a cooperative scientific approach, STAD is material in the form of real problems that can be observed, grouping students to guide and trigger student questions, monitoring group discussions to collect information, evaluating individual quizzes, and communicating the results of the evaluation to obtain group awards. Then it can be inferred, based on different presentations of relevant study findings, that this method can be said to be successful. The scientific approach to the cooperative environment of STAD can be used by teachers as a strategy to enhance student achievement and motivation. In addition, it can be used by teachers to build the knowledge of students efficiently and effectively.

1.
Slavin
and
Robert
E.
, “
Cooperative Learning
”, (
Teori, Riset, Praktik
) (
2009
)
2.
Yusuf
Syamsu
, “
Program Bimbingan Konseling di Sekolah (SLTP dan SLTA
)”,
Bandung Pustaka Bani Quraisy
(
2006
)
3.
Nuraeni
D.
,
Utaya
S
and
Akbar
,
S.
, “
Pentingnya Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dalam Aktivitas Belajar Pada Siswa
”, pp
1
5
(
2016
)
4.
Yohanes
R. S.
, “
Teori Vygotsky dan implikasinya terhadap pembelajaran matematika
”,
Jurnal Widya Warta
,
XXXIV
(
2
), pp
854
1981
(
2010
)
5.
Riyanto
B.
and
Siroj
R. A.
, “
Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran Dan Prestasi Matematika Dengan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas
”,
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
,
5
(
2
) (
2014
).
6.
Winkel
W. S.
, “
Psikologi Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Belajar
”,
Jakarta PT Gramedia
(
1996
)
7.
Depdiknas
, “
Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional
” (
2003
)
8.
OECD
, “
PISA 2018 Results Volume I. What Students Know and Can Do In OECD Publishing
” (
2019
)
9.
Hooper M. M.ullis I. V. S
Martin
M. O., “
Context Questionnaire Framework Martin In TIMSS 2015 Assessment Frameworks
”, (
2015
)
10.
Ananggihi
G. W.
,
Yuwono
I.
and
Sulandra
I. M.
, “
Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Concept Rich Instruction Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas Vii Smpn 3 Bandung Tulungagung Pada Materi Aritmatika Sosial
”,
Jurnal Pendidikan
3
(
1
) pp
77
81
(
2018
)
11.
Popham
W. J.
., “
Classrooms Assessment What Teachers Need to Know Needham Heights Mass Allyn and Bacon
”, (
1995
)
12.
Tella
A.
, “
The impact of motivation on student’s academic achievement and learning outcomes in mathematics among secondary school students in Nigeria Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education
”,
3
(
2
) pp
149
156
(
2007
)
13.
Siregar
Eveline
and
Nara
Hartini
, “
Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran Bogor Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia
” (
2011
)
14.
Imron
,
Ali
, “Belajar dan Pembelajaran Jakarta Dunia Pustaka Jaya Jakarta Slavin R. E. 1995 Cooperative learning Theory research and practice (2nd ed.)”,
Englewood Cliffs NJ Prentice Hall
, (
1996
)
15.
A.M
Sadirman
, “Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar”,
Jakarta
(
1994
)
16.
Wlodkowski
Raymond
, “
Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn A Comprehensive Guide for Teaching All Adults (3rd ed
.)”,
San Francisco Jossey-Bass
528
pp (
2008
)
17.
Slavin
R. E.
., “Cooperative learning Theory research and practice (2nd ed.)”,
Englewood Cliffs NJ Prentice Hall
(
1995
)
18.
Maryani
M.
,
Fachruddin
S. M.
and
Maizora
S.
, “
Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Antara Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation Dan Student Teams Achievement Division
”,
Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS)
1
(
1
) pp
54
59
(
2017
)
19.
Slavin
Robert
E., “
Cooperative Learning Teori Riset dan Praktik
”,
Bandung Nusa Media
(
2008
)
20.
Wijaya
H.
and
Arismunandar
A.
, “
Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Berbasis Media
”,
Sosial Jurnal Jaffray
16
(
2
)
175
(
2018
)
21.
Esminarto
E.
,
Sukowati
S.
,
Suryowati
N.
and
Anam
K.
, “
Implementasi Model Stad Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siwa
”.
Briliant: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual
1
(
1
)
16
(
2016
)
22.
Mahmudi
A.
, “
Pendekatan Saintifik dalam Pembelajaran Matematika
.
Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika Uny (1)
”, pp
561
566
(
2015
)
23.
As'ari
A. R.
., “
Mewujudkan Pendekatan Saintifik Dalam Kelas Matematika
”,
Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika March
2015
pp
1
21
(2013)
24.
Daryanto
, “
Pendekatan Pembelajaran Saintifik Kurikulum 2013
”,
Yogyakarta Gava Media
(
2014
)
25.
Hosnan
M.
, “
Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21
”,
Bogor Ghalia Indonesia
(
2014
)
26.
Templier
M.
and
Pare
G.
, “
A Framework For Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews Communications od Assosiations for Information Systems
37
(September), pp
112
137
(
2015
)
27.
Ginanjar
A.
,
Saragih
S.
and Kartini, “
Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences
”,
Sciences
7
(
1
) p
44
(
2019
)
28.
Lestari W.
Pratama
L. D. and
Jailani
J.
, “
Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik Setting Kooperatif Tipe STAD Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika
”,
AKSIOMA Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika
9
(
1
) p
29
(
2018
)
29.
Fabella
I. R.
and Rosnawati, “
Efektivitas Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Melalui Setting Kooperatif STAD Ditinjau dari Prestasi dan Motivasi Siswa SMP Kelas VIII
”,
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
6
(
6
) pp
55
68
(
2017
)
30.
Naviano
Rinda
and
Wutsqa
Dhoriva
U., “
Keefektifan Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Division ( Stad ) Dan Think Pair Share ( Tps ) Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Dan Prestasi Peserta Didik Kelas XI Smk N 4 Surakarta
”,
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
pp
79
88
(
2017
)
31.
Kaharuddin
Andi
, “
Komparasi Keefektivan Pendekatan Saintifik ELPSA dan Open-Ended Setting Kooperatif Tipe STAD dalam Pembelajaran Matematika pada Kelas VII SMP Negeri Akreditasi Adi Kota Makassar
”,
Tesis Makassar Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Makassar
(
2018
)
32.
D.
Della
,
Triyanto
,
Aryuna
and
Ratri
D.
, “
Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Student Teams Achievement III(1
)”, pp
491
500
(
2019
)
33.
Abujale
Abujina
,
Anwar
Bey
, L. S., “
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika
Volume
1
No.
2
September 2016 1(2) pp
1
12
(
2013
)
34.
Ali
M.
and
Upu
,
H.
, “
Model Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams Achievement
”,
9
(
1
) pp
16
28
(
2015
)
35.
Minggi
I.
and
Makasssar
U. N.
., “
Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams-Achievement Division ( Stad ) Dengan Pendekatan Saintifik
2
(
1
) pp
25
32
(
2019
)
36.
Slavin
Robert
E., “Cooperative Learning Theory Research and Practice”,
Massachusset USA Allymand & Bacon
(
1995
)
37.
Stad
,
D.
,
Linier
,
P.
,
Variabel
,
S.
,
Siswa
,
B.
,
Vii
,
K.
, &
Negeri
,
S. M. P
, “
Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Student Teams Achievement
”,
III
(
1
) pp
491
500
(
2019
)
38.
Abujale
Abujina
and
Anwar
Bey
L. S., “
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika
Volume
1
No.
2
September
2013
”, 1(2) pp
1
12
(2013)
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.