Researchers found that non-cognitive factors and the school of students can affect the academic achievement of students during the educational phase. The goal of this study is to examine the relationship between non-cognitive factors and school characteristics to mathematics achievement. Data used in this study were taken from 9262 students in 334 schools in Indonesia that participated in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2018. At the student level, the non-cognitive aspects include life satisfaction, positive feelings, and negative feelings; while at the school level, the independent variables include school categories (public/private), distance considerations in the admission of new students, and school environment. Multilevel analyses showed that feelings of happiness and anxiety at the student level had positive relationship with mathematics achievement, and students attending public school (at the school level) were reported to have a better mathematics achievement.

1.
OECD
,
Who are the low-performing students?
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2016
).
2.
OECD
,
What 15-Year-Old Students in Indonesia Know and Can Do
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2018
).
3.
M. H.
Ashcraft
,
Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.
11
(
5
),
181
185
(
2002
).
4.
R. B.
King
and
S.
Areepattamannil
,
J. Pacific. Rim. Psychol.
8
(
1
),
18
27
(
2014
).
5.
G.
Leder
,
P.
Grootenboer
,
Math. Educ. Res. J.
17
(
2
),
1
8
(
2005
).
6.
J.
Mo
,
How Is Students’ Motivation Related to Their Performance and Anxiety?
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2019
).
7.
OECD
,
Does Math Make You Anxious?
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2015
).
8.
R.
Pakpahan
,
Pendidik
dan Kebud
.
1
(
3
),
331
47
(
2016
).
9.
S.
Murphy
,
Math. Educ. Res. J.
31
(
3
),
219
35
(
2019
).
10.
OECD
,
Does it matter which school a student attends?
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2013
).
11.
OECD
,
What makes urban schools different?
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2013
).
12.
OECD
,
PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2019
).
13.
OECD
,
PISA 2015 Results (Volume III): Students’ Well-Being
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2017
).
14.
OECD
,
Are students happy? PISA 2015 Results: Students’ Well-Being
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2017
).
15.
OECD
,
PISA 2018 Results (Volume III): What School Life Means for Students’ Lives
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2019
).
16.
R.
Pekrun
,
S.
Lichtenfeld
,
H. W.
Marsh
,
K.
Murayama
and
T.
Goetz
,
Child Dev.
88
(
5
),
1653
70
(
2017
).
17.
OECD
,
PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
2019
).
18.
OECD
,
PISA Data Analysis Manual SPSS
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2009
).
19.
J.
Pinheiro
,
D.
Bates
,
S.
DebRoy
,
D.
Sarkar
,
S.
Heisterkamp
,
B.
Van Willigen
and
Maintainer
R.
,
Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models
(R package version,
2017
)
20.
W. H.
Finch
,
J. E.
Bolin
and
K.
Kelley
,
Multilevel Modeling Using R
(
CRC Press
,
New York
,
2019
).
21.
J. L.
Peugh
,
J. Sch. Psychol.
48
(
1
),
85
112
(
2010
).
22.
A.
Karakolidis
,
V.
Pitsia
and
A.
Emvalotis
,
Int. J. Educ. Res.
79
,
106
15
(
2016
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.