Many different arguments have been offered in order to explain how social economic, student attitude and school size might affect mathematics achievement. This study focuses on explaining the importance of school size and student teacher ratio in affecting students’ mathematics scores in Indonesia using data from PISA 2018. Total observations used in this study were 9,090 students from 308 schools. The multilevel analysis results showed that the higher the school size the higher the student’s mathematics achievement, while in contrast with the student teacher ratio. In addition, the index of economic, social and cultural status and attitude towards school were found to be significant variables affecting the students’ mathematics achievement.

1.
K.
Leithwood
and
D.
Jantzi
Review of Edu. Research
79
, pp.
464
490
(
2009
).
2.
S.
Areepattamannil
and
B.
Kaur
J. Inter. of Scie. and Math. Edu.
5
, pp.
11
(
2013
).
3.
H. D.
Linda
J. Teacher. Qual. And Stude. Achiev.
8
, pp.
1
44
(
2000
).
4.
S. T.
Lubienski
and
C.
Lubienski
Phi. Del. Kap.
86
, pp.
696
699
(
2005
).
5.
T.
Hampden
Socia, Scien, Reserc,
42
, pp.
804
817
(
2013
).
6.
K.
Kartianom
and
O.
Ndayizeye
J. Riset Pend. Mat.
2
, pp.
200
210
(
2017
).
7.
J. A.
Egalite
and
B.
Kisida
An. J. Inter. Res. Pol and Prac.
1
12
(
2016
).
8.
C.
Cipriano
,
K.
Pieloch
,
T.
Barnes
, and
E.
Rivers
J Inter. Learn. Envir. Reserc.
(
2018
).
9.
M. G.
Kent
Edu and and Urban Socie.
21
, pp.
164
174
(
2015
).
10.
S.
Kilic
,
E.
Cene
, and
I.
Demir
ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri.
12
, pp.
2594
2598
(
2012
).
11.
S.
Areepattamannil
J. of Adole.
4
, pp.
367
375
(
2014
).
12.
J.
Lee
and
Stankov
Learn. and Indi. Diff.
26
, pp.
119
130
(
2003
).
13.
R. M.
Ingersoll
and
D.
Perda
J America. Edu Research.
3
, pp.
563
594
(
2010
).
14.
L.
Perry
and
A. M.
Conney
Teach. Collag. Rec.
(
2010
).
15.
V.
Pitsia
,
A.
Biggart
, and
A.
Karakolidis
Learn. and Indi. Diff.
55
, pp.
163
173
(
2017
).
16.
C.
Hu
,
Y.
Gong
,
C.
Lai
and
F. K. S.
Leung
Comp. and Edu.
1
13
(
2018
).
17.
M.
Straus
Šolsko polje, letnik 25, številka 5/6, str.
pp.
121
143
, 157–159 (
2012
).
18.
F.
Giobona
and
M.
Porcu
Socio. Eco. Plan. Scie
pp.
11
12
(
2017
).
19.
I.
Demir
,
A.
Kilic
, and
H.
U’nal
Proce. Soc. and Behavi. Scie.
2
, pp.
3099
3103
(
2010
).
20.
A.
Karakolidis
,
V.
Pitsia
, and
A.
Emvalotis
J. Intern. of Edu. Research.
3
, pp.
106
115
(
2016
).
21.
L. J.
Peugh
J. of Sch Psych
48
, pp.
85
112
(
2010
).
22.
A. J. M.
Neil
,
D. L.
Prater
and
S.
Busch
J. Inter. of Leader. in Edu.
1
, pp.
73
84
(
2009
).
23.
R. M.
Ingersoll
and
D.
Perda
J America. Edu Research.
3
, pp.
563
594
(
2010
).
24.
V. C. M.
Lovd
Americ. Psych.
53
, pp.
185
04
(
1998
).
25.
I.
Schoon
and
S.
Parsons
J of Voc Behavi.
60
, pp.
262
28
(
2002
).
26.
L. M.
Thien
Asia-Pacific Edu. Research.
25
, pp.
657
666
(
2016
).
27.
P. G.
Zimbardo
and
M. R.
Leippe
The psychology of attitude change and social influence
(3rd ed) (
Mc Graw-Hill
,
1991
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.