Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) are abilities that must be taught to students as a provision to face the progress of the times. To measure students' HOTS, a teacher must be able to compose HOTS questions. For this reason, prospective teacher students must also be equipped with the ability to prepare HOTS questions to teach and measure their students' higher-order thinking skills. This study aims to explore the content knowledge of prospective teacher students in designing HOTS questions. Content knowledge of prospective mathematics teacher students is seen from three main components, namely knowledge of subject matter, pedagogical content, and curricular content. This research is a qualitative descriptive with 7 groups of subjects formed from 20 students of the Mathematics Education Study Program, State University of Malang. Data was collected through project assignments and unstructured interviews. Data analysis was carried out by presenting data, reducing data, and concluding data. The results showed that there were differences in knowledge about mathematics, pedagogical content, and curriculum content. This difference can be seen from the HOTS questions compiled by prospective teacher students in each group. Group 1 can compile HOTS questions as much as 42.5% of the total questions. Groups 2, 6, and 7 compose HOTS questions as much as 25% of the total questions. Group 3 compiled HOTS questions as much as 35% of the total questions. Group 4 compiled HOTS questions as much as 27.5% of the total questions. Group 5 compiled HOTS questions as much as 0% of the total questions. Suggestions that can be given from the results of this study are the importance of designing new learning models that can improve the ability of prospective mathematics teachers in designing and teaching mathematics to future students.

1.
NCTM. Six
Principles for School Mathematics
. In:
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
2000
. p.
1
6
.
2.
Bloom
BS
.
Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: The cognitive domain
.
New York, NY
:
McKay
;
1956
.
3.
Wilson
LO
.
Bloom's Taxonomy Revised Understanding the New Version of Bloom's Taxonomy.
2016
.
4.
Staples
ME
,
Truxaw
MP
.
An initial framework for the language of higher-order thinking mathematics practices
.
Math Educ Res J.
2012
;
(
24
):
257
281
.
5.
Lince
R.
Creative Thinking Ability to Increase Student Mathematical of Junior High School by Applying Models Numbered Heads Together
.
J Educ Pract.
2016
;
7
(
6
):
206
12
.
6.
Park
J.
,
Song
J.
How Is Intuitive Thinking Shared and Elaborated During Small-Group Problem-Solving Activities on Thermal Phenomena ?
Res Sci Educ.
2018
;
1
28
.
7.
Kashani-vahid
L.
,
Afrooz
G.
,
Shokoohi-yekta
M.
,
Kharrazi
K.
,
Ghobari
B.
Can a creative interpersonal problem solving program improve creative thinking in gifted elementary students?
Think Ski Creat.
2017
;
24
:
175
85
.
8.
Karimah
RKN
.
Analysis of difficulties in mathematics learning on students with guardian personality type in problem-solving HOTS geometry test
.
J Phys Conf Ser.
2018
;
1008
(
012076
).
9.
Pramesti
,
Retnawati
H.
Difficulties in learning algebra: An analysis of students’ errors
.
J Phys Conf Ser.
2019
;
1320
(
012061
).
10.
Murtafiah
W.
,
Sa'dijah
C.
,
Chandra
TD
, Susiswo.
Exploring the Types of Problems Task by Mathematics Teacher to Develop Students’ HOTS
. In:
AIP Conference Proceedings
2215
.
2020
. p.
1
7
.
11.
Sa'dijah
C.
,
Sa'diyah
M.
, Sisworo,
Anwar
L.
Students’ mathematical dispositions towards solving HOTS problems based on FI and FD cognitive style
.
AIP Conf Proc.
2020
;
2215
(April).
12.
Ball
DL
,
Thames
MH
,
Phelps
G.
Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?
J Teach Educ.
2008
;
59
(
5
):
389
407
.
13.
Torff
B.
Developmental Changes in Teachers’ Use of Higher Order Thinking and Content Knowledge
.
J Educ Psychol.
2003;95
(
3
):
563
9
.
14.
Lachner
A.
,
Nückles
M.
Tell me why! Content knowledge predicts process-orientation of math researchers’ and math teachers’ explanations
.
Instr Sci.
2016
;
44
(
3
):
221
42
.
15.
Murtafiah
W.
,
Lukitasari
M.
Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Mathematics Pre-Service Teacher through Microteaching Lesson Study
.
J Pendidik Mat.
2019
;
13
(
2
):
201
18
.
16.
Shulman
LEES
.
Those Who Undesrtand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
.
Educ Res.
1986
;
15
(
2
):
4
14
.
17.
Leikin
R.
,
Waynberg
AL
.
Exploring mathematics teacher knowledge to explain the gap between theory-based recommendations and school practice in the use of connecting tasks
.
Educ Stud Math.
2007
; (November).
18.
Miles
M.
,
Huberman
M.
,
Saldana
J. Qualitative Data Analysis
. Vol.
1
,
European Journal of Science Education
.
2014
.
427
440
p.
19.
Anderson
L.
,
Krathwol
,
D. R.
Airasian
,
P. W.
Cruikshank
,
K. A. Mayer
RE
,
Pintrich
PR
,
Raths
J.
,
Wittrock
MC
. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives.
New York: Longman
;
2001
.
20.
Mohd
Yusof
Y.,
Zakaria
E.
The Integration of Teacher's Pedagogical Content Knowledge Components in Teaching Linear Equation
.
Int Educ Stud.
2015
;
8
(
11
):
26
33
.
21.
Leong
KE
,
Meng
CC
,
Rahim
SSAR
.
Understanding Malaysian Pre- Service Teachers Mathematical Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge
.
Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ.
2015
;
11
(
2
):
363
70
.
22.
Kunter
M.
,
Klusmann
U.
,
Richter
D.
Professional Competence of Teachers: Effects on Instructional Quality and Student Development
.
J Educ Psychol.
2013
;
105
(
3
):
805
20
.
23.
Kilic
C.
Turkish Primary School Teachers’ Opinions about Problem Posing Applications: Students, the Mathematics Curriculum and Mathematics Textbooks
.
Aust J Teach Educ.
2013
;
38
(
5
):
143
55
.
24.
Anderson
LW
,
Krathwohl
D.
A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
.
New York
:
Addison Wesley Longman
;
2001
.
25.
Murtafiah
W.
,
Sa'dijah
C.
,
Chandra
TD
,
Susiswo
S.
Decision making of the Winner of the National Student Creativity Program in Designing ICT-based Learning Media
.
TEM J.
2019
;
8
(
3
):
1039
45
.
26.
Hill
HC
,
Schilling
SG
,
Ball
DL
.
Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching
.
Elem Sch J.
2004
;
105
(
1
):
11
30
.
27.
Lestari
NDS
,
Juniatii
D.
,
Suwarsono
.
Exploring the Knowledge of Content and Teaching of Prospective Math Teacher in Planning Mathematical Literacy Teaching
.
IOP Conf Ser J Phys Conf Ser
1097
012150
.
2018
;
28.
Abdullah
AH
,
Abidin
NLZ
,
Ali
M.
Analysis of students’ errors in solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction
.
Asian Soc Sci.
2015
;
11
(
21
):
133
42
.
29.
Suryamiati
W.
,
Kahar
AP
,
Setiadi
AE
.
Improving higher-order thingking skill through POE (Predict, Observe, Explain) and guided discovery learning models
.
J Pendidik Biol Indones.
2019
;
5
(
2
):
245
52
.
30.
Apino
E.
,
Retnawati
H.
Developing Instructional Design to Improve Mathematical Higher Order Thinking Skills of Students
.
J Phys Conf Ser.
2017
;
812
(
012100
):
3
10
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.