Misconceptions are still found in various circles, including students at the University. The age of undergraduate students should have the ability to think scientifically at the level of formal thinking so that they can think abstractly and rarely experience misconception. This study aims to analyze the misconceptions of salt hydrolysis that occur in students and compare the misconceptions that occur in students at the every level of scientific thinking from the lower level of thinking (concrete) to the higher level of thinking (upper formal). The method used is descriptive. The research used 68 students in the second year at the Chemistry Department of Malang State University. The instrument used to detect misconceptions is the four tier diagnostic test. The instrument used to measure scientific thinking ability is the classroom test of scientific reasoning (CSTR) instrument. The results obtained are that there are misconceptions of 17.65% at the upper formal thinking level, 32.35% at the low formal thinking level, and 50.00% at the concrete level. These results indicate that the potential for misconceptions occurs at a lower level of thinking more than the potential for misconceptions at a higher level of thinking.

1.
A.
Basheer
N,
Kortam
N
,
Zahran
A
,
Hofestein
M
and Hugerat.
Misconceptions among Middle School Students Regarding the Conservation of Mass during Combustion
,
EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed,
vol.
14
, no.
7
,
2018
. pp.
3109
3122
; doi:
2.
Amelia
D
, Marheni and Nurbaity.
Analysis of Students’ Misconceptions on Salt Hydrolysis Material Using Modified CRI (Certainty of Response Index) Technique
.
Chemical Education Research Journal
,
4
(
1
),
260
266
(
2014
).
3.
Andini
N
, and
Bakti
I.
Application of the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) Learning Model with the Assisted Concept Map on Learning Outcomes of Salt Hydrolysis Material for Class XI Science Students at MAN 1 Banjarmasin
.
QUANTUM, Journal of Science Education Innovation
,
6
(
2
),
57
65
(
2015
).
4.
Anggraeini
ME
, Effendy, and Munzil.
The Effectiveness of Three Level Multiple Choice and Multiple Choice- Interview Tests in Identifying Acid-Base Misconceptions
.
Journal of Chemistry and Education
,
3
(
1
),
40
50
(
2017
).
5.
Anwarudin
A
,
Nuswowati
M
, and
Widiarti
N.
Analysis of Students’ Misconceptions on Salt Hydrolysis Materials Through Diagnostic Tests
.
Chemistry in Education
,
8
(
1
),
1
7
(
2019
).
6.
Asnawi
R.
Misconceptions on Electrochemical Materials Seen from Students’ Scientific Thinking Ability.
Unpublished Thesis.
Malang: Postgraduate UM
,
2017
.
7.
Canpolat
N
,
Pınarbaşı
T
,
Bayrakçeken
S
, and
Geban
,
Ö.
Some Comman Misconceptions in Chemistry Gazi University
,
Faculty of Education Journal,
24
(
1
),
135
146
(
2004
).
8.
Cooper
MM
,
Cox
CT
,
Nammouz
M
,
Case
E.
An Assessment of the Effect of Collaborative Groups on Students‘ Problem -Solving Strategies and Abilities
.
Journal of Chemical Education
,
85
:
866
872
(
2008
).
9.
Cracolice
,
Mark
S
,
Deming
JC
, Ehlert, and Brian.
Concept Learning versus Problem Solving: A Cognitive Difference
.
Journal of Chemical Education
,
85
(
6
),
873
879
(
2008
).
10.
Effendy
.
Efforts to Overcome Conceptual Mistakes in Teaching by Using Cognitive Conflict Strategies
.
Chemical Communication Media
,
2002
;
2
(
6
):
1
19
(
2002
).
11.
Habiddin
, and
Page
E.
(20 Theory, Research and Development 19). Development and Validation of A Four-Tier Diagnostic Instrument for Chemical Kinetics (FTDICK
).
Indonesian Journal of Chemistry
,
2019
. DOI:
12.
Herron
JD
.
The Chemistry Classroom.
Washington
:
American Chemical Society
.
1996
.
13.
Ibda
F.
Cognitive Development: Theory of Jean Piaget
.
Intelektualita
,
3
(
1
),
27
38
(
2019
).
14.
Kaltakci-Gurel
D
,
Eryilmaz
A
, and
McDermott
LC
.
Identifying Pre Service Physics Teachers’ Misconceptions And Conceptual Difficulties About Geometrical Optics
.
European Journal of Physics
,
37
(
4
),
045705
(
2016
).
15.
Kamilah
DS
, and
Suwarna
IP
.
Development of a Digital Three Tier Test to Identify Misconceptions in the Concept of Static Fluids
.
Edusains
,
8
(
2
) :
212
220
(
2016
).
16.
Lawson
AE
.
The Nature And Development Of Scientific Reasoning : A Synthetic View
.
International Journal of Scientific and Mathematics Education
2
(
3
) :
307
-
338
(2004).
17.
Orwart
K
,
Mikuli
AM
, and
Bernard
P.
Alternative Conceptions of Common Salt Hydrolysis among Upper- Secondary School Students
,
Journal of Baltic Science Education
·,
16
(
1
):
64
76
(
2017
).
18.
Ozmen
H.
Some Student Misconceptions in Chemistry: A Literature Review of Chemical Bonding
.
Journal of Science Education and Technology
,
2
(
13
):
147
159
(
2004
).
19.
Palisoa
N
,
Tahya
D
, and
Kayadoe
V.
Students Misconception Identification of Chemical Candidates Teachers Using Three Tier Test Method in The Basic Concept Of Chemical Bond
.
Edu Science J
,
1
(
1
) :
37
43
(
2020
).
20.
Sari
RP
, and Seprianto.
Analysis of Multiple Ability Representations of Chemistry FKIP Students at Samudra University Semester II on Acid-Base and Acid-Base Titrations
.
Indonesian Journal of Science Education;
2018
;
6
(
1
) :
55
62
.
21.
Stojanovska
M
,
Petruševski
VM
, and
Šoptrajanov
B.
Study of the Useof the Three Levels of Thinking and Representation
,
Section of Natural, Mathematical and Biotechnical Sciences, MASA, Vol
35
(
2014
).
22.
Suwarto
.
Development of Diagnostic Tests in Learning
.
Yogyakarta
:
Student Library
,
2013
.
23.
Suyono
, and
Hariyanto
.
Learning and Learning Basic Theories and Concepts
.
Bandung
:
PT Remaja Rosdakarya
,
2015
.
24.
Ürek
T.
A Practice of active Learning Based on Constructivism to Eliminate Misconceptions on Covalent Bonds. Hacettepe University
,
Faculty of Education Journal
,
28
,
168
177
(
2005
).
25.
Yunitasari
I
,
Widarti
HR
, and
Nazriati
.
Misconceptions of Acids and Bases Based on Multiple Representations at Cross Educational Levels
.
Educational Journal: Theory, Research and Development
,
4
(
12
):
1635
1642
(
2019
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.