In the twenty-first century, technology has improved to the point that digital information resources more varied. Students must develop information literacy skills to solve problems effectively and efficiently. Information literacy skills can be enhanced using of many learning models, one of which is RICOSRE. The RICOSRE learning model is comprised of learning activities that enable students to enrich and collect data. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of RICOSRE learning model via an online platform on students’ information literacy skills. This study belonged to a quasi-experiment with a pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group. The population of this study consisted of all tenth-grade students from public high schools in Malang. Three tenth-grade classes from the science department at Senior High School 1 Singosari and three tenth-grade classes from the science department at Senior High School 7 Malang were included in the sample. RICOSRE was used to facilitate the experimental class, PBL was used to facilitate the positive control class, and conventional learning was used to facilitate the negative control class. The research instruments consisted of learning tools and essay tests. The research data were in pretest and posttest scores measured using an information literacy skills rubric adapted from the Association of America Colleges and Universities. ANCOVA and LSD tests were performed for data analysis. The study results showed that the online platform-based RICOSRE learning model affected students’ information literacy skills. RICOSRE students achieved a more significant percentage of gain in skills than PBL or conventional students. Students whose learning was supported by RICOSRE increased their information literacy skills by 91.04%. This finding implies that RICOSRE delivered online can enhance students’ information literacy skills.

1.
Naibaho
K.
Menciptakan Generasi Literat Melalui Perpustakaan
.”
Visi Pustaka.
2007
;
9
.
3
:
1
8
.
2.
Kurnianingsih
I
,
Rosini
R
,
Ismayati
N.
Upaya Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Digital Bagi Tenaga Perpustakaan Sekolah dan Guru di Wilayah Jakarta Pusat Melalui Pelatihan Literasi Informasi
.
J Pengabdi Kpd Masy (Indonesian J Community Engag.
2017
;
3
(
1
):
61
.
3.
Suryanti
S
,
Wijayanti
L.
Literasi Digital: Kompetensi Mendesak Pendidik Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0
.
EduStream J Pendidik Dasar.
2018
;
2
(
1
):
1
9
.
4.
Monge
R
,
Frisicaro-Pawlowski
E.
Redefining Information Literacy to Prepare Students for the 21st Century Workforce
.
Innov High Educ.
2014
;
39
(
1
):
59
73
.
5.
Association of College and Research Libraries
.
Information literacy competency standards for higher education
.
Community Jr Coll Libr.
2000
;
6.
Johnston
B
,
Webber
S.
Information literacy in higher education: A review and case study
.
Stud High Educ.
2003
;
28
(
3
):
335
52
.
7.
Iannuzzi
P.
Information literacy competency standards for higher education
.
Community Jr Coll Libr.
2000
;
9
(
4
):
63
7
.
8.
Hall
AM
.
The use of a learning station to increase self-control for homework completion
.
Behav Anal Today.
2003
;
4
(
2
):
124
6
.
9.
Saepudin
E.
Tingkat Budaya Membaca Masyarakat
.
J Kaji Inf Perpust.
2015
;
3
(
2
):
271
82
.
10.
Regina
Nifmaskossu
,
Aceng Rahmat
FM
.
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia
.
J Pendidik Bhs dan Sastra Indones.
2019
;
8
(
1
):
104
15
.
11.
IEA AR
.
International Annual Report
.
2012
12.
Hastini
LY
,
Fahmi
R
,
Lukito
H.
Apakah Pembelajaran Menggunakan Teknologi dapat Meningkatkan Literasi Manusia pada Generasi Z di Indonesia?
J Manaj Inform.
2020
;
10
(
1
):
12
28
.
13.
Awaliyah
D.
 Kemampuan Literasi Infromasi Siswa di SMAIT Nurul Fikri Depok.
Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Islamic
State University
;
2015
.
14.
Mawaddah
K
,
Mahanal
S
,
Gofur
A
,
Zubaidah
S.
Scientific and Information Literacy of High School Students.
2020
;
8
(
2
):
35
44
.
15.
Hoyer
J.
Information is social: Information literacy in context
.
Ref Serv Rev.
2011
;
39
(
1
):
10
23
.
16.
Weyers
M.
Teaching the FE curriculum
.
London
:
Continuum Publishing Group
;
2006
.
46
p.
17.
Ilhamdi
ML
,
Santoso
D
,
Astuti
SP
.
Penerapan Metode Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Biologi Mata Pelajaran Lintas Minat
.
J Pijar Mipa.
2020
;
15
(
2
):
135
.
18.
Pernantah. Desain Skenario Pembelajaran Aktif Dengan Metode
Mikir” pada Mata Kuliah Pendidikan IPS
.
Indones J Soc Sci Educ.
2019
;
1
(
2
):
145
55
.
19.
Kisworo
TW
,
Sumarni
W.
Analisis Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Dalam Masa Pandemi
.
Semin Nas Pascasarj 2020 Issn 2686 6404.
2020
;
21
(
1
):
1
9
.
20.
UNESCO
.
290 million students out of school due to COVID-19: UNESCO releases first global numbers and mobilizes response
.
2020
Mar 4.
21.
Qun
Z
,
Xiaocheng
Z.
The Design of Individual Knowledge Sharing Platform Based on Blog for Online Information Literacy Education
.
Phys Procedia.
2012
;
33
:
1426
32
.
22.
Wilson
C.
Media and information literacy : Challenges and opportunities for the world of education
.
2019
.
23.
Guo
J
,
Huang
J.
Information literacy education during the pandemic: The cases of academic libraries in Chinese top universities
.
J Acad Librariansh.
2021
;
47
(
4
):
102363
.
24.
Mahanal
S
,
Zubaidah
S.
Model Pembelajaran RICOSRE yang Berpotensi Memberdayakan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif
.
J Pendidik Teor Penelitian, dan Pengemb.
2017
;
2
(
5
):
676
85
.
25.
Smith
Macklin
A.
Integrating information literacy using problem-based learning
.
Ref Serv Rev.
2001
;
29
(
4
):
306
14
.
26.
Jiang
J
,
Guan
S
,
Yu
X
,
Sun
J.
Application of PBL Teaching Method in Management Information System Course.
2020
;
2
(
2
):
23
34
.
27.
Arends
RI
. Learning to Teach. Sixth Edit.
New York
:
McGrawHill
;
2007
.
57
p.
28.
Malmia
W
,
Makatita
SH
,
Lisaholit
S
,
Azwan
A
,
Magfirah
I
,
Tinggapi
H
, et al. 
Problem-based learning as an effort to improve student learning outcomes
.
Int J Sci Technol Res.
2019
;
8
(
9
):
1140
3
.
29.
Association of America Colleges and Universities
.
Information Literacy Value Rubric.
2013
.
2
p.
30.
Juleha
S
,
Nugraha
I
,
Feranie
S.
The Effect of Project in Problem-Based Learning on Students’ Scientific and Information Literacy in Learning Human Excretory System
.
J Sci Learn.
2019
;
2
(
2
):
33
.
31.
Julien
H
,
Barker
S.
How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development
.
Libr Inf Sci Res.
2009
;
31
(
1
):
12
7
.
32.
Herliandry
LD
,
Nurhasanah
N
,
Suban
ME
,
Kuswanto
H.
Pembelajaran Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19
.
JTP - J Teknol Pendidik.
2020
;
22
(
1
):
65
70
.
33.
Shaharanee
INM
,
Jamil
JM
,
Rodzi
SSM
.
Google classroom as a tool for active learning
.
AIP Conf Proc.
2016
;
1761
(August).
34.
Minalla
AA
.
The Effect of WhatsApp Chat Group in Enhancing EFL Learners’ Verbal Interaction outside Classroom Contexts
.
English Lang Teach.
2018
;
11
(
3
):
1
.
35.
Irhandayaningsih
A.
Tingkat Literasi Informasi Mahasiswa Menurut Standar ACRL: Studi Kasus Peserta KKN UNDIP di Masa Pandemi COVID-19
.
Anuva J Kaji Budaya, Perpustakaan, dan Inf.
2021
;
5
(
1
):
53
61
.
36.
Lobo
,
J.
, &
Dhuri
KR
.
Positive Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic in Enhancing Digital Literacy Skills Among Library Professionals: A Study
.
Libr Philos Pract.
2021
;
1
19
.
37.
Kanchai
T.
EFL Teachers ’ ICT Literacy Acquisition to Online Instruction during COVID-19
.
Learn J Lang Educ Acquis Res Netw.
2021
;
14
(
2
):
282
312
.
38.
Pujiono
S.
Berpikir Kritis dalam Literasi Membaca dan Menulis untuk Memperkuat Jati Diri Bangsa
.”
J Pendidik dan Pembelajaran.
2012
;
3
(
7
):
778
83
.
39.
Zubaidah
S.
Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Penemuan Dalam Scientific Approach Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Remap Coople
.
Semin Nas XI Pendidik Biol FKIP UNS Biol Sains, Lingkungan, dan Pembelajarannya.
2014
;
1000
11
.
40.
Walipah
E
, Rahman,
Sopandi
W
,
Sujana
A.
School Literacy Movement in the Industrial Revolution Era 4. 0 in Building Speed Reading Skills
.
2nd Int Conf Elem Educ.
2020
;
2
:
1763
70
.
41.
Teravainen-Goff
A.
Bookmark Reading Impact Evaluation: Insights from Teachers and Volunteers
.
A National Literacy Trust Research Report. Natl Lit Trust.
2020
;(
1116260
):
1
14
.
42.
Hussain
I
,
Munshi
P.
Identifying Reading Preferences of Secondary School Students
.
Creat Educ.
2011
;
02
(
05
):
429
34
.
43.
Naderi
,
H.
,
Abdullah
,
R.
,
Hamid
,
T. A.
,
Sharir
,
J.
, &
Vijay
KM
.
Relationship between creativity and academic achievement: A study of gender differences
.
J Am Sci.
2010
;
6
(
1
):
181
90
.
44.
Ukachi
NB
.
Exploration of information literacy skills status and impacts on the quality of life of artisans in Lagos, Nigeria
.
Eletronic Libr.
2018
;
34
(
1
):
1
5
.
45.
Greenstein
L.
Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning
.
SAGE Publications Ltd
.;
2012
.
151
p.
46.
Mukhopadhyay
DR
.
Problem Solving In Science Learning - Some Important Considerations of a Teacher
.
IOSR J Humanit Soc Sci.
2013
;
8
(
6
):
21
5
.
47.
Maharani
,
N.T. Y. Meningkatkan
Kemampuan Menulis. BAPALA.
2020
;
7
((
2
)):
1
13
.
48.
Widiarsa
IN
.
Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Metode Diskusi.
2020
;
1
(
3
):
234
53
.
49.
Wenger
K.
Problem-Based Learning and Information Literacy: A Natural Partnership
.
Pennsylvania Libr Res Pract.
2014
;
2
(
2
):
142
54
.
50.
Munro
K
,
Hon
BA
.
College & Undergraduate Libraries Modified Problem-Based Library Instruction
.
2013
;(November):
37
41
.
51.
Paterson
SF
,
Gamtso
CW
.
Guiding students from consuming information to creating knowledge: A freshman English library instruction collaboration
.
Commun Inf Lit.
2011
;
5
(
2
):
117
26
.
52.
Santharooban
S
,
Premadasa
PG
.
Development of an information literacy model for problem based learning
.
Ann Libr Inf Stud.
2015
;
62
(
3
):
138
44
.
53.
Jainuri M. M. Jainuri
Mat-Edukasia
:
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.
2016
;
1
(
2
):
1
11
.
54.
Lorenzen
M.
Active learning and library instruction
.
Illinois Libr.
2001
;
83
(
2
):
19
24
.
55.
Jayawardana
HBA
.
Paradigma Pembelajaran Biologi Di Era Digital
.
J Bioedukatika.
2017
;
5
(
1
):
12
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.