This study presents the development of fragility curves for a three-span reinforced concrete box girder bridge. The model was designed based on ASSTHO LRFD 2017 standard. CSiBridge software was used as the main tool for nonlinear time history analysis (NTHA) which is also referred to as incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). Seven ground motions from the real earthquake were used to generate IDA curves. All the ground motions were converted to acceleration response spectrum and scaled up or down depending on the fundamental period, T1 of the bridge according to the Eurocode 8 (EC8) elastic respond spectrum to suit the characteristic of the ground motion to the soil type. The performance level was identified based on IDA curves. These performance levels include operational phase (OP), immediate occupancy (IO), damage control (DC), live safety (LS) and collapse prevention (CP). These levels will be used to observe the structural performance of the bridge. Results show that piers with 5 m height have better performance than those with 7 m height. The fragility curves were then developed for 5 m and 7 m pier height. Fragility curves show the probability of exceeding the performance levels is higher for 7 m pier height.

1.
E.
Omranian
,
A.
Abdelnaby
,
G.
Abdollahzadeh
,
M.
Rostamian
, and
F.
Hosseinpour
, “
Fragility curve development for the seismic vulnerability assessment of retrofitted RC bridges under mainshock-aftershock seismic sequences
” (
In Structures Congress
2018
) pp.
308
316
.
2.
Y.
Bavaghar
and
M.
Bayat
,
Journal Vibroengineering
,
19
(
4
),
2749
2758
, (
2017
).
3.
D.
Vamvatsikos
and
C. Allin
Cornell
,
Earthquake Engineering Structure Dynamic
,
31
(
3
),
491
514
, (
2002
).
4.
F. M.
Nazri
,
D. E.
Padang
,
Y.
Mustafasanie
M, K.
Moustafa
, and
N. Z. N.
Azizan
,
MCRJ
,
27
,
11
17
, (
2019
).
5.
K.
Fouad
,
R.
Mustapha
, and
K.
Abderrahmane
,
“Seismic Assessment of Algerian Bridge,” (In International Congress and Exhibition
Sustainable Civil Infrastructures: Innovative Infrastructure Geotechnology Springer, Cham
,
2017
) pp.
307
317
.
6.
Eurocode
,
C. E. N.
Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings, EN 1998–3
” (
European Committee for Standardization: Bruxelles, Belgium
,
2005
) pp.
8
.
7.
Y. E.
Ibrahim
and
M. M.
El-Shami
,
IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering
,
4
(
4
),
213
223
. (
2011
).
8.
Q.
Xue
,
C. W.
Wu
,
C. C.
Chen
, and
K. C.
Chen
,
Eng. Struct.
30
(
6
),
1535
1547
(
2008
).
9.
A.
Ghazali
,
H. Al-Haris
Alaydrus
,
S. C.
Alih
, and
M.
Vafaei
, “
Seismic fragility of concrete box girder bridges in Malaysia
,” (
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
,
2019
)
513
,
1
, p.
012019
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.