Practicum is an activity that is very important in the physics learning process. In this era of information and technology, many physics simulations can be used in the learning process. These simulations are applications on Android that can be accessed quickly and downloaded for free in the google play store. This opportunity can be used to improve the existing learning process in schools. But how to use this simulation in the learning process is not widely known. We need a study to develop an experimental module using this simulation. The main objective of this study is to create a practical module using a virtual physics laboratory on optical material for junior high schools. The stages of development are needed analysis, preliminary design, validation by experts (learning technology experts and subject matter experts), and product trials by users or student’s responses. The virtual laboratory-based learning module that has been developed is classified as very feasible. This shows that these products can be used to support the learning process of grade VIII students. The result is supported by the average respondents’ assessment of 82% in the “very good” category. This assessment was obtained from the results of the learning material expert’s evaluation of 83% in the “very good” category, 70% of media experts in the “good” category, 85% of colleagues in the “very appropriate” category, User of 81% in the “very good” category, and student responses of 82% in the “very good” category. It is concluded that the physics learning module using the Physics Virtual Lab application is suitable for use as a learning module for junior high school students.

1.
G.
Tembrevilla
and
M.
Milner-Bolotin
,
Phys. Educ.
54
,
025008
(
2019
).
2.
R. R.
Hake
,
Am. J. Phys.
66
,
64
74
(
1998
).
3.
K.
Miller
,
N.
Lasry
,
K.
Chu
, and
E.
Mazur
,
Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res.
9
,
020113
(
2013
).
4.
M. K.
Smith
,
W. B.
Wood
,
W. K.
Adams
,
C.
Wieman
,
J. K.
Knight
,
N.
Guild
, et al..,
Science
323
,
122
124
(
2009
)
5.
C.
Wieman
and
K.
Perkins
,
Phys. Today
58
,
36
41
(
2005
).
6.
E.
Wiwin
and
R.
Kustijono
, “The use of physics practicum to train science process skills and its effect on scientific attitude of vocational high school students,” in
Seminar Nasional Fisika (SNF)-2017
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 997 (IOP Publishing
,
Bristol, UK
,
2018
), p.
012040
.
7.
M. N.
Sheeba
,
Educationia
2
,
108
123
(
2013
)
8.
D. D.
Phonna
,
R.
Safitri
, and
M.
Syukri
, “Guided inquiry-based on practicum to improve critical thinking skills on the subject of Newton’s law,” in
The 1st Annual International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education-2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1460 (IOP Publishing
,
Bristol, UK
,
2020
), p.
012129
.
9.
H.
Henlenti
,
S.
Syamsurizal
, and
R.
Asyhar R
,
J.
Pendidik
.
Mat. Ilmu Pengetah. Alam
3
,
57
63
(
2014
).
10.
G.
Gunawan
,
A.
Harjono
,
H.
Sahidu
,
L.
Herayanti
,
N. M. Y.
Suranti
, and
F.
Yahya
, “Using Virtual Laboratory to Improve Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Creativity and Problem-Solving Skills on Thermodynamics Concept,” in
5th International Seminar on Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education-2018, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1280 (IOP Publishing
,
Bristol, UK
,
2019
), p.
052038
.
11.
P.
Razi
,
J. Teknol. Pendidik.
6
,
119
124
(
2013
)
12.
R. B.
Syaifulloh
and
B.
Jatmiko
,
J. Inov. Pendidik. Fis.
3
,
174
179
(
2014
).
13.
Harms
U.
Virtual and remote labs in physics education
,” in
2nd European Conference on Physics Teaching in Engineering Education-2000
, pp.
140
146
(
2000
).
14.
T.
De Jong
,
M. C.
Linn
, and
Z. C
Zacharia
,
Science
340
,
305
308
(
2013
).
15.
G.
Gunawan
,
N.
Nisrina
,
N. M. Y.
Suranti
,
L.
Herayanti
, and
R.
Rahmatiah
, “
Virtual laboratory to improve students’ conceptual understanding in physics learning
,”
Mathematics, Informatics, Science and Education International Conference-2018, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1108 (IOP Publishing, Bristol, UK
,
2018
), p.
012049
.
16.
S. S.
Maulidah
and
E. C.
Prima
,
J. Sci. Learn.
1
,
116
121
(
2018
).
17.
Z.
Tatli
and
A.
Ayas
,
Educ. Technol. Soc.
16
,
159
170
(
2013
)
18.
I. A. D.
Astuti
,
Dasmo
, and
R. A.
Sumarni
,
J. Pengabdi. Masy.
24
,
695
701
(
2018
).
19.
N.
Ibrahim
and
Ishartiwi
,
Refleks
.
Edukatika: J. Ilm. Kependidikan
8
,
80
88
(
2017
).
20.
S.
Prihatiningtyas
,
T.
Prastowo
, and
B.
Jatmiko
,
J.
Penelit
.
Pendidik. Sains
2
,
135
141
(
2017
).
21.
C.
Piraksa
and
N.
Srisawasdi
, “
Promoting students’ physics motivation by blended combination of physical and virtual laboratory environment: A result on different levels of inquiry
,” in
Workshop Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computers in Education-2014
(
2014
).
22.
M. A.
Faour
and
Z.
Ayoubi
,
J. Educ. Sci. Environ. Health
4
,
54
68
(
2018
).
23.
H.
Pratama
,
Sarwanto
, and
Cari
,
Inkuiri J. Pendidik. IPA
4
,
11
20
(
2015
)
24.
Indaryanti
,
Y.
Hartono
, and
N.
Aisyah
,
J. Pendidik. Mat.
2
,
35
44
(
2008
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.