Task design is a key factor in learning. In today’s online learning context, task design is integrated with technology called digital task design. The success of using digital task design is determined by the perception of it. The purpose of this study is to analyze the perception of pre-service mathematics teachers on digital task design used in analytic geometry and multivariable calculus courses. This study involved 72 pre-service mathematics teachers. Data were collected using a questionnaire with a Likert scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics including mean, maximum-minimum score and standard deviation. The results show that the majority of pre-service mathematics teachers have a positive perception of digital task design in the high category. Positive perceptions with high categories appear in the domain of learning effectiveness, depth and breadth of material and enthusiasm in learning. However, pre-service mathematics teachers see that digital task design is a new burden for them in learning. The implication of this research is that the use of digital task design can be considered as an approach in learning mathematics.

1.
A.
Watson
and
M.
Ohtani
,
Task Design In Mathematics Education
(
Springer
,
Cham
,
2015
).
2.
A.
Leung
and
A.
Baccaglini-Frank
,
Digital Technologies in Designing Mathematics Education Tasks
(
Springer
,
Cham
,
2017
).
3.
C.
Margolinas
,
J.
Ainley
, and
A.
Watson
, “Introduction,” in
Proceedings of ICMI Study 22
, edited by
C.
Margolinas
,
J.
Ainley
, and
A.
Watson
(
ICMI
,
Oxford
,
2013
).
4.
P.
Sullivan
,
D. M.
Clarke
, and
B.
Clarke
,
Teaching with Tasks for Effective Mathematics Learning
(
Springer
,
New York
,
2013
).
5.
Y.
Yurniwati
and
E.
Utomo
, “Problem-based learning flipped classroom design for developing higher-order thinking skills during the Covid-19 pandemic in geometry domain,” in
5th Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (SENATIK)-2020, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1663
(
IOP Publishing
,
Bristol
,
2020
), p.
012057
.
6.
A.
Bakker
,
J.
Cai
, and
L.
Zenger
,
Educ. Stud. Math.
107
,
1
24
(
2021
).
7.
A.
Al-Ataby
,
Int. J. Innov. Educ. Res.
8
,
317
331
(
2020
).
8.
F. C.
Bonafini
, and
Y.
Lee
,
TechTrends
65
,
303
319
(
2021
)
9.
R.
Weinhandl
,
Z.
Lavicza
,
T.
Houghton
, and
M.
Hohenwarter
,
Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol
, (
2021
).
10.
A.
Bakker
and
D.
Wagner
,
Educ. Stud. Math.
104
,
1
4
(
2020
).
11.
S. M.
Günster
and
H. G.
Weigand
,
ZDM-Math. Educ.
52
,
1259
1274
(
2020
)
12.
A.
Leung
, “Exploring Techno-Pedagogic Task Design in the Mathematics Classroom,” in
Digital Technologies in Designing Mathematics Education Tasks
, edited by
A.
Leung
and
A.
Baccaglini-Frank
(
Springer
,
Cham
,
2017
).
13.
H. L.
Johnson
,
E. D.
McClintock
, and
A.
Gardner
,
Digit. Exp. Math. Educ.
6
,
340
366
(
2020
)
14.
P.
Vahey
,
H. J.
Kim
,
N.
Jackiw
,
H.
Sela
, and
J.
Knudsen
,
ZDM-Math. Educ.
52
,
1275
1290
(
2020
).
15.
N.
Huda
,
T. S.
Wahyuni
, and
F. D.
Fauziyah
, “Students’ Perceptions of Online Mathematics Learning and Its Relationship Towards Their Achievement,” in
Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Social Science (ICONETOS)-2020
, edited by
S.
Senjana
 et al. (
Atlantis Press
,
Dordrecht
,
2021
).
16.
Nisiyatussani
,
V. Ayuningtyas
,
M.
Fathurrohman
, and
N. J.
Anriani
,
Math. Educ.
9
,
27
40
(
2018
).
17.
G.
Brousseau
,
Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics
(
Kluwer Academic Publishers
,
Dordrecht
,
2002
).
18.
K. E.
Matthews
,
P.
Adams
, and
M.
Goos
,
CBE Life Sci. Educ.
9
,
290
297
(
2010
).
19.
Sugiyono
,
Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D
(
Alfabeta
,
Bandung
,
2012
).
20.
T.
Chao
,
J.
Chen
,
J. R.
Star
, and
C.
Dede
,
Digit. Exp. Math. Educ.
2
,
253
277
(
2016
).
21.
M.
Henderson
,
N.
Selwyn
, and
R.
Aston
,
Stud. High. Educ.
42
,
1567
1579
(
2017
).
22.
H. L.
Johnson
,
A.
Coles
, and
D.
Clarke
,
ZDM-Math. Educ.
49
,
813
822
(
2017
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.